Moción para rescindir o cierre administrativo: ¿cuál es la diferencia?

Angelica Rice • March 9, 2023

Click here to read this article in Portuguese and English

El sistema de tribunales de inmigración de los Estados Unidos actualmente está abrumado con cientos de miles de casos de inmigración que aún no se han adjudicado. En un esfuerzo por manejar este volumen de casos y eliminar algunos de sus casos atrasados, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS, por sus siglas en inglés) y el Tribunal han flexibilizado sus políticas sobre la terminación y el cierre administrativo de ciertos tipos de casos que han considerado no ser casos prioritarios de ejecución. ¿Entonces, qué significa esto? ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre cerrar administrativamente un caso y terminar un caso? ¿Es esto algo que desea perseguir en su caso? Continúa leyendo para averiguarlo.

Cierre Administrativo

El cierre administrativo es una herramienta de gestión de expedientes judiciales que se utiliza para pausar temporalmente los procedimientos de deportación. Asunto de W-Y-U-, 27 I&N 17 de diciembre de 18 (BIA 2017). El “cierre administrativo” de un caso elimina temporalmente el caso del calendario activo del juez de inmigración y lo pone en espera hasta que el Departamento o el abogado del demandado haga una moción para “reprogramar” el caso. Para que se cierre la administración de su caso, el Departamento debe estar de acuerdo con el cierre administrativo.

Los jueces de inmigración pueden cerrar casos administrativamente por una variedad de razones, una de las más comunes es cuando se trata de un caso de baja prioridad o “sin prioridad de ejecución” y el Departamento no desea proseguir con la adjudicación del caso en este momento. Otra razón común para el cierre administrativo es cuando un Demandado tiene otro recurso pendiente con la USCIS, y la decisión sobre ese otro recurso afectaría el caso del Tribunal del Demandado. Por ejemplo, si un demandado tiene una petición I-130 actualmente pendiente con la USCIS pero también está en un proceso de inmigración, el juez puede acordar cerrar administrativamente el caso del demandado para esperar la decisión de USCIS sobre el I-130. Lo que significa que no se programarán audiencias futuras en el caso del Demandado hasta que el Departamento o el abogado del Demandado tomen medidas para volver a colocar el caso en el expediente activo del Tribunal. Si se aprueba el I-130, el demandado puede solicitar que se vuelva a programar su caso y solicitar que su caso judicial sea finalmente desestimado. Si bien su caso está cerrado administrativamente, en ciertas circunstancias, aún puede solicitar un permiso de trabajo.

Terminación de Procedimientos

Si considera que su caso no debería presentarse ante el Tribunal de Inmigración en absoluto, ya sea porque ya se le ha otorgado otra solución o porque no se le colocó correctamente en los procedimientos o por alguna otra razón, el Demandado o su Abogado pueden presentar una Moción solicitando que su caso sea desestimado.

La desestimación de los procedimientos significa que ya no tiene un caso con el Tribunal de Inmigración. Según las políticas actuales del DHS y del Tribunal, se alienta al Departamento a ejercer su discreción procesal y aceptar desestimar los casos que no son prioridades de ejecución; lo que significa que el demandado no es una amenaza para la seguridad nacional, no tiene antecedentes penales o ingresó a los Estados Unidos antes de noviembre de 2020. Sin embargo, si su caso judicial es desestimado y usted no es elegible para ningún otro remedio y/o no puede solicitar alivio con la USCIS, entonces no podrá obtener un permiso de trabajo y simplemente estará en los Estados Unidos sin estatus y sin beneficios de inmigración. Es por esta razón que a veces el Demandado opta por no solicitar la rescisión y desea seguir adelante con su caso en el Tribunal.

Determinar si alguna de estas opciones es adecuada para usted puede ser complicado. Debe consultar a uno de nuestros abogados de inmigración calificados para determinar si el cierre administrativo o la terminación son adecuados para usted y su caso.

Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que lea aquí.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice

Motion to Terminate or Admin Close: What’s the Difference?

By Angelica Rice • August 11, 2022

The United States Immigration Court system is currently overwhelmed with hundreds of thousands of immigration cases that have yet to be adjudicated. In an effort to handle this volume of cases and clear out some of their backlogged cases, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Court, have relaxed their policies on terminating and administratively closing certain kinds of cases that they have deemed not to be enforcement priority cases. So, what does this mean? What is the difference between administratively closing a case or terminating a case? Is this something you want to pursue in your case? Keep reading to find out.

Can Undocumented Immigrants Obtain a Driver’s License in the U.S.?

By Angelica Rice • May 20, 2022

Many undocumented immigrants, or immigrants without status, wonder if they are able to get a United States driver’s license. Some states allow for this, while many states still do not, so whether or not you are able to get a driver's license without evidence of status depends on where you live. See below a brief guide to obtaining a non-immigrant driver’s license in the United States.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

USCIS Changes H-1B Lottery to Wage-Based Selection

By Kris Quadros-Ragar • January 15, 2026

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major change to the H-1B cap selection process. Under a final rule issued on December 29, 2025, USCIS will replace the long-standing random H-1B lottery with a wage-weighted selection system that favors higher-paid and more complex positions. The rule is scheduled to take effect on February 27, 2026 , just ahead of the fiscal year 2027 H-1B cap registration season, unless delayed by legal challenges. If implemented, USCIS is expected to release additional guidance explaining how employers must submit registrations under the revised process. This change marks one of the most significant reforms to the H-1B program in recent years. Up until 2025, all registrations were treated equally once the annual cap was reached. Under the new system, selection odds will be tied to wage levels based on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics data. All H-1B registrations will still be placed into a single selection pool, but registrations tied to higher wage levels will receive multiple entries into that pool, increasing their likelihood of selection. Lower wage levels will receive fewer entries, making selection less likely but not impossible. H-1B wage levels are not determined solely by salary. Each wage level reflects the complexity of the job, the level of responsibility involved, and the education and experience required . Entry-level positions involving routine duties and close supervision are generally classified at the lowest wage level, while positions requiring independent judgment, advanced skills, and significant responsibility fall into higher wage levels. The highest wage level is reserved for roles that involve expert knowledge, strategic decision-making, and substantial leadership or technical authority. USCIS is expected to closely scrutinize selected petitions to ensure that the wage level claimed during registration is supported by the job duties and salary offered in the petition. Any discrepancies between the registration and the petition may result in requests for evidence, denials, or enforcement action. With the elimination of the purely random lottery, employers should begin preparing early by carefully evaluating job descriptions, wage levels, and overall H-1B strategy. Accurate classification and thoughtful planning will be essential under this new wage-based selection system. If you are an employer considering H-1B sponsorship, or a foreign professional wondering whether your position may qualify under the new wage-based system, consulting with experienced immigration counsel is more important than ever. Santos Lloyd Law is actively advising clients on H-1B cap registrations and strategy under the new rules. To discuss your options or determine whether you may qualify, contact our office to schedule a consultation.

Increase in issuance of EB-1A RFEs

By April Perez • January 9, 2026

During the recent administration there has been an increase in issuance of Requests for Evidence for EB-1A petitions for those of Extraordinary Ability. A Request for Evidence is a request that is made by USCIS that should explain how the evidence is deficient in proving the criteria argued and what additional evidence needs to be provided by the applicant to meet the criteria. EB-1A petitions are already normally subject to higher scrutiny because their approval is the first step needed to apply for Lawful Permanent Residence or a green card. USCIS normally requires not just evidence but that the evidence be provided with context and information to show why it matters in a particular field. For example, if you were providing evidence of your membership in an organization that requires outstanding achievements of its members, just providing evidence of the membership is not enough. You must explain what that membership is and provide background information on the organization granting the membership. You also need to provide evidence on the criteria that is used to select the members, information on those who select the members to show that they are recognized experts, other documentation such as articles about the membership organization to show its importance, and any other relevant evidence and background information to show that the criteria is met. A request for evidence being issued prior to the current administration was not uncommon, but in the current climate it is more surprising to not receive a request for evidence for this type of case. It is important to remember that a request for evidence is not a denial. Depending on the validity of the information in the request and the substance some Requests for Evidence can be overcome, and the case be approved. It is important to carefully review the request and note if there are any errors in the content and application of the regulations by USCIS. If you have an attorney, you should work with them and make sure that you provide any evidence you think may be helpful. Although there is a deadline by which a response must be submitted, attention to detail and patience will go a long way when dealing with having to respond to a request for evidence. If you believe you may qualify for this type of visa, please feel free to contact our office.

The F-1 Student Visa

By Joseph Lennarz • November 20, 2025

Once you have connected with a college program, have been admitted to the school, and deemed eligible to compete athletically, you will need to secure an F-1 student visa in order to actually attend your new college and begin your time as a student athlete. The first step in the visa process is to receive your Form I-2