New Florida Bill – FL 1718
Denice Flores • August 24, 2023
Governor Ron DeSantis from the State of Florida signed a new bill into law which will take effect July 1, 2023.
FL 1718 is a law
that will affect all Florida residents, not just undocumented immigrants. The new law will restrict the ability of undocumented individuals to live and work in the state of Florida.
In short, FL 1718 will:
- Criminalize the act of transporting an undocumented individual into Florida.
- Require hospitals to collect immigration status information from patients.
- Require Florida employers to document employment verification procedures for state law purposes, mandates E-Verify participation for most Florida employers and creates separate penalties for violations.
- Restrict access to Florida driver’s and professional licenses.
- Empower the state of Florida to participate in the enforcement of federal immigration laws.
FL 1718 will make it a felony crime for a person to knowingly and willfully transport another person, including a minor, who entered the United States in violation of the law and who was not inspected by immigration authorities since entering the U.S., into the state of Florida. FL 1718 will not criminalize living with, sheltering, renting, or transporting undocumented persons within the state of Florida.
FL 1718 will require hospitals that accept Medicaid to ask on patient admission forms, the legal status of the patient. This means that the form will ask whether the patient is a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, or undocumented. The forms must include an option where the patient can choose to decline to answer.
FL 1718 will make it a state crime to knowingly employ, hire, recruit, or refer, either for themselves or on behalf of another, for private or public employment a foreign national who is not authorized to work in the U.S. An employer will also be prohibited from employing an undocumented worker after obtaining knowledge that an individual is or has become undocumented. Violations can result in revocation of an employer’s state business license and fines.
The bill will also provide criminal penalties for an undocumented and unauthorized individual who uses false identification documents or who uses another person’s identification documents to work.
Employers with 25 or more employees will be required to use E-Verify for all new employees and employers must retain a copy of documentation provided for E-Verify. Employers will be required to verify each new employee’s employment eligibility within 3 business days after the first workday of the new employee. Employers will also be required to keep verification from E-Verify for the last 3 years for employees.
To enforce the new E-Verify requirements, starting July 1, 2024, state law enforcement will be authorized to perform random audits of businesses and can request copies of documentation from the employer to verify employees’ employment. Penalties may be imposed for non-compliance.
FL 1718 will prohibit counties and municipalities from funding the issuance of identification documents to a person who does not provide proof of lawful presence in the U.S. Note, documents may be issued but not government funding will not be permitted.
Driver’s licenses issued by other states to individuals who cannot provide proof of lawful presence will not be valid in the state of Florida. State law enforcement must cite any person driving with such a license.
Other impacts that this new law will have are that effective November 1, 2028, there will be restrictions for DACA recipients and other undocumented individuals to be admitted to the Florida Bar; state law enforcement who have “custody of a person because of the “issuance of an immigration detainer by a federal immigration agency”‘ will be required to take DNA samples from the person; the law will prohibit a state or local governmental entity, or law enforcement agency from restricting a law enforcement agency from sending employment eligibility information to a federal immigration agency.
It is important to be informed about this new law that takes effect July 1, 2023. If you believe you may be affected by this law you should speak to an attorney.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
