Políticas de Trabalho Remoto - Posso trabalhar remotamente nos Estados Unidos com meu visto?
Santos Lloyd Law Team • February 1, 2024
Click here to read this article in English
O fator mais importante para trabalhar remotamente nos Estados Unidos é a autorização de trabalho adequada. A lei de imigração dos EUA exige que qualquer pessoa que receba renda nos Estados Unidos tenha autorização de trabalho adequada.
O que acontece se eu receber renda de um empregador estrangeiro enquanto estiver nos Estados Unidos?
Mesmo que esteja trabalhando para um empregador no exterior, trabalhar enquanto estiver fisicamente localizado nos Estados Unidos ainda é considerado trabalho pelo governo dos Estados Unidos, mesmo que o trabalhador seja pago para uma conta bancária estrangeira. Por exemplo, se um detentor de visto B-1/B-2 estiver viajando para os Estados Unidos para turismo ou fins de negócios específicos, ele pode entrar nos Estados Unidos para passeio, participar de reuniões ou eventos, mas não pode trabalhar nos Estados Unidos, pois o visto B-1/B-2 não concede autorização de trabalho.
Como posso trabalhar remotamente?
Não há uma categoria de visto designada para trabalhadores remotos nos Estados Unidos, mas existem vistos de não imigrante que são flexíveis. Vistos de trabalho de não imigrante, como E, L, TN, F-1, OPT, P-1 e O-1, não têm restrições quanto aos locais de trabalho da mesma forma que alguns outros vistos e há flexibilidade em relação ao trabalho remoto. Por exemplo, atletas com visto P-1 podem viajar a trabalho devido à sua profissão, assim como profissionais com visto O-1, mas deve ser dentro dos limites de seu visto.
Quais trabalhadores têm restrições no trabalho remoto?
Os trabalhadores com visto H-1B estão restritos a trabalhar nos locais listados em sua petição de patrocínio H-1B. Isso ocorre devido ao requisito da Aplicação de Condição de Trabalho (LCA) e à análise do salário vigente. Em alguns casos, os trabalhadores com visto H-1B podem ter "trabalho remoto ocasional" se o empregador solicitar isso. Isso aconteceria quando o endereço residencial do trabalhador com visto H-1B estiver próximo ao local normal de trabalho listado na LCA do empregador, incluindo o endereço residencial. Outro caso em que isso pode ocorrer é se o trabalhador com visto H-1B for trabalhar a uma distância significativa do local de trabalho da LCA. Podem ser necessárias petições de emenda e taxas de arquivamento.
Para patrocínios H-1B, pode ser útil para os empregadores incluir como locais de trabalho o endereço residencial do funcionário e o local normal de trabalho, se possível. A USCIS revogou duas memorandos de política em relação a colocações em locais de terceiros e itinerários relacionados para trabalhadores com visto H-1B, então é mais fácil listar o endereço residencial e o local de trabalho de um trabalhador com visto H-1B.
Se você tiver alguma dúvida sobre essas informações, por favor, entre em contato com nossos escritórios.
Este blog não se destina a fornecer aconselhamento jurídico e nada aqui deve ser interpretado como estabelecimento de um relacionamento advogado-cliente. Por favor, agende uma consulta com um advogado de imigração antes de agir com base em qualquer informação lida aqui.
This Facebook widget is no longer supported.
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
