Qu'est-ce qu'une demande de preuves ?
April Perez • September 14, 2023

Click here to read this article in English
La chose la plus importante à comprendre est qu'il ne s'agit pas d'un refus. Une demande de preuves peut être émise pour tout type de requête déposée auprès de l'USCIS. La demande de preuves est généralement émise par l'agent chargé de la révision si un document spécifique est manquant ou si l'agent estime que les preuves fournies ne sont pas suffisantes pour remplir les conditions d'approbation de la demande.
Dans le cas des visas P1A pour les athlètes, des visas O ou des visas EB1, l'agent peut indiquer que plus d'une exigence nécessite des preuves supplémentaires. Les preuves supplémentaires demandées varieront, car chaque agent considérera les preuves selon sa propre interprétation des exigences. Les preuves supplémentaires soumises en réponse à la demande de preuves doivent être accompagnées d'une lettre explicative abordant les lacunes signalées par l'agent, et les preuves fournies doivent être jointes à la lettre explicative en tant que pièces à conviction. Parmi les exemples de preuves supplémentaires possibles, on peut citer des informations plus détaillées sur les récompenses ou les prix que la personne a reçus, ou des informations supplémentaires sur des projets passés ou futurs, ou sur des événements auxquels le demandeur a participé ou participera. Le plus important est d'essayer de fournir le maximum de preuves supplémentaires demandées par l'agent afin que ce dernier comprenne mieux les preuves fournies pour répondre aux exigences.
Dans certains cas, l'agent peut avoir négligé un ou plusieurs éléments de preuve importants. Il est important de le signaler dans la réponse et cela peut justifier une demande de contrôle par le supérieur hiérarchique dans la réponse de votre avocat.
Il est important de fournir autant d'informations supplémentaires que possible, car il s'agit de la dernière occasion de prouver à l'agent que la personne remplit les conditions requises pour le type de visa demandé.
Une fois la réponse reçue par l'USCIS, le délai estimé pour la délivrance d'une décision, si le dossier a été soumis à un traitement prioritaire, repasse à 15 jours ouvrables à compter de la date de réception de la réponse. Si le dossier n'a pas été soumis à un traitement prioritaire, l'estimation du délai de décision est basée sur les délais de traitement indiqués sur le site web de l'USCIS.
Si une demande de preuves est reçue pour votre dossier, il est important de travailler en étroite collaboration avec votre avocat pour essayer de faire approuver votre dossier.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently updated its protocols regarding the screening and vetting of immigration benefit applications. These changes involve a more detailed review process that may impact processing times and evidence requirements for various categories of benefits. Key Changes to the Adjudication Process The updated guidance outlines several shifts in how USCIS processes and reviews applications: Adjustment of EAD Validity Periods: For certain categories, the validity periods of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) may be shortened. This can result in more frequent eligibility reviews throughout the application process. Expanded Use of Social Media and Financial Data: Adjudicators have been granted broader authority to review an applicant’s social media activity and financial history during the vetting process. Policy Updates on Biometric Verification: The agency is revising its approach to biometric identity verification, including the reuse of fingerprints and photographs. Country-Specific Scrutiny: USCIS is coordinating with the Department of State to apply specific analysis to applications based on regional risk factors and fraud indicators. Impact on Interviews and Processing Applicants for adjustment of status, naturalization, and other benefits may encounter more focused questioning during interviews. USCIS is now tailoring its interview process to address potential red flags associated with specific geographic regions or benefit categories. Because of this increased scrutiny, it is essential that all information provided in an application is consistent with an applicant's public record and digital footprint. Discrepancies or incomplete documentation can result in delays or additional requests for evidence. Next Steps As these procedures are implemented, applicants should ensure that all submitted materials are accurate and verifiable. We recommend a thorough review of all public information and documentation prior to filing. If you have questions regarding how these procedural changes may affect your specific case, our team is available to discuss the current requirements and help navigate the updated process.

Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.

