Get in touch
949-316-0078
info@santolloydlaw.com
Action positive de l'État en matière d'immigration
Kyle Huffman • Nov 10, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Ces derniers mois, une grande partie de la conversation publique et de la couverture médiatique autour de l'immigration a été largement négative. La Floride, en particulier, a dominé le cycle de l'information sur l'immigration avec l'adoption et la mise en œuvre de la loi SB 1718, qui, entre autres choses, a renforcé le pouvoir des forces de l'ordre de l'État d'appliquer les lois fédérales sur l'immigration.
Bien que l'accent ait été mis sur les développements négatifs, d'autres États ont fait de grands progrès pour améliorer le système d'immigration. Il est important de souligner ces initiatives.
Deux États ont récemment fait des efforts pour améliorer l'accès à l'éducation des résidents immigrés. L'un de ces États est le Minnesota, qui a introduit le projet de loi HF 2073. Le projet de loi est actuellement en cours d'examen, mais s'il est adopté, il fournira des fonds supplémentaires aux collèges et universités de l'État du Minnesota et modifiera les programmes de subventions existants. Ces changements comprennent une aide accrue aux frais de scolarité pour les familles à faibles revenus, indépendamment du statut d'immigrant, ce qui permettra à de nombreuses personnes qui ne pouvaient auparavant pas accéder à ces avantages en raison de leur statut d'immigrant, de bénéficier d'une aide aux frais de scolarité. De même, la Chambre des représentants de l'État de l'Utah a adopté la loi HB 102, qui étend l'application des taux de scolarité dans les universités de l'Utah aux réfugiés, aux asilés et aux personnes en liberté conditionnelle pour des raisons humanitaires. Ces changements devraient réduire considérablement les frais de scolarité de ces groupes dans l'enseignement supérieur, permettant ainsi à ces personnes d'améliorer leur propre éducation et d'acquérir des connaissances et des compétences utilisables sur le marché du travail.
Outre l'amélioration de l'accès à l'enseignement supérieur, plusieurs États se tournent vers la réforme de l'immigration pour combler les lacunes du marché du travail. Par exemple, le Maryland a supprimé l'obligation de résidence permanente pour l'obtention d'une licence, ce qui permet aux résidents non immigrants qualifiés de pratiquer la médecine et, en fin de compte, de contribuer à atténuer la pénurie de main-d'œuvre dans le domaine des soins médicaux. De même, le Tennessee a adopté la loi SB 1451, qui facilite le processus d'obtention d'une licence médicale américaine pour les professionnels qui ont été éduqués et formés dans d'autres pays et sous d'autres systèmes. L'Arizona, quant à lui, a adopté le SB 1563, qui crée une nouvelle commission chargée d'étudier les obstacles inutiles à l'entrée sur le marché du travail auxquels sont confrontés les nouveaux Américains, dans le but de faciliter l'entrée sur le marché du travail et, en fin de compte, d'apporter une contribution importante à l'économie nationale.
En l'absence d'une réforme globale et radicale de l'immigration au niveau fédéral, nous constatons une tendance croissante des États à prendre des mesures dans ce domaine du droit, traditionnellement dominé par la politique et l'application fédérales. Nous continuerons à suivre l'évolution de la situation État par État, en première ligne de la réforme de l'immigration.
Si vous avez des questions sur ce que cela signifie pour vous, n'hésitez pas à prendre rendez-vous avec l'un de nos avocats expérimentés.
Nous nous ferons un plaisir de travailler avec vous.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.
The U.S. Constitution protects all immigrants, including undocumented immigrants while participating in protests in the U.S. Here is a list of some of the rights covered in the U.S. constitution to consider when you are participating in protests: Right to free speech. The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting your right to free speech. People have the right to participate in protests, marches, and demonstrations. Right to be free from retaliation. The First Amendment prohibits the government from retaliating against you for exercising your rights such as your right to free speech. Right to remain silent. The Fifth Amendment protects you from self-incrimination and provides the right to remain silent. Right against unreasonable search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment protects you against unreasonable searches and seizures. Right to speak to a lawyer. If you are arrested or detained, you have the right to speak to a lawyer. Keep in mind, if you are undocumented and you are participating in protests, you are at higher risk of being detained by immigration officials if they are present at the protest. If you are undocumented make sure you have a plan in place if you are arrested or detained by law enforcement or immigration officials. It is important to take precautions and if you are arrested or detained you should contact an attorney immediately. If you have questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys and we will be more than happy to assist you.
The latest policy alert, PA-2024-05, issued by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on March 21, 2024, brings revisions to the USCIS Policy Manual, specifically focusing on expediting requests. These updates aim to simplify and elucidate the process for applicants, particularly those facing emergencies or urgent humanitarian needs. The primary goal is to make it easier for applicants to understand how to request expedited processing for their various submissions, including applications, petitions, appeals, or motions, especially in cases concerning government interests or urgent situations. While USCIS has historically permitted immigration benefit seekers to request expedited application processing in specific circumstances, the process has frequently been perceived as unclear, with decisions made arbitrarily on a case-by-case basis. The recent update seeks to rectify this by providing clarity and uniformity to the process and establishing explicit criteria and documentation standards. In order to request expedited processing, applicants need to adhere to a more defined procedure. This involves submitting thorough documentation and illustrating the urgency or government relevance of their case. The recent update also explains how USCIS reviews these requests, offering applicants a better grasp of the process. The update introduces special measures for speeding up the processing of Form I-131 (Application for Travel Document) in emergency situations. This acknowledges the urgent need for certain applicants to travel. The policy also acknowledges that expedited requests may be evaluated if there is evident USCIS error, aiming to uphold fairness and accountability within the processing system. These changes aim to make the expedited request process more transparent and understandable for applicants and their representatives. In summary, USCIS's revision regarding expedited requests signifies a notable advancement in rendering the immigration process more transparent and attentive to applicants' requirements. By comprehending these updated guidelines, applicants and their representatives can more effectively navigate the expedited request procedure, ensuring that urgent cases receive due consideration. If you believe you qualify for expedited processing under the recent USCIS policy updates, feel free to contact our office, and we will be more than happy to assist you. FONT : https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-1-part-a-chapter-5
As of April 1, 2024, USCIS has instituted an inflation adjustment to immigration application filing fees . These fee increases apply to a majority of the different application types, including family-based, non-immigrant, and immigrant petitions. As a part of these fee increases, USCIS has also instituted a new program designed to provide funding to the United States’ Asylum Program, in order to better address the massive backlog of pending asylum claims currently waiting to be adjudicated. Unfortunately, these changes have led to confusion among petitioners for when they are required to pay the Asylum Program Fee, and when they may qualify for a 50% or complete exemption from the fee. The Asylum Program Fee is required to be submitted by employers in all I-129 and I-140 petitions filed on or after April 1, 2024. The Asylum Program Fee is $600, however, certain exemptions apply . Small employers , defined as having 25 or fewer total employees, qualify for a reduction of the Asylum Program Fee, but are still required to submit a reduced fee of $300. Individual petitioners, or self-petitions, such as in the case of an EB-2 National Interest Waiver, are considered small employers for the purpose of the Asylum Program Fee and are also required to submit the reduced $300 fee. Non-profit organizations are exempted from the Asylum Program fee and are not required to submit any additional funds with the ordinary I-129 or I-140 filing fee. In addition, non-profits qualify for a 50% reduction of the ordinary filing fee in certain types of applications, bringing the overall filing fee burden down substantially for non-profit organizations. With these changes to USCIS’ filing fee schedule, USCIS is hoping for significant improvements to efficiency and processing for pending asylum applicants. If you or your petitioning organization need any assistance in preparing an application for an immigration benefit, including ensuring proper compliance with the new fee requirements, our office is ready and waiting to help!