Positive State Action in Immigration
Kyle Huffman • August 3, 2023
In recent months, a great deal of the public conversation and news coverage around immigration has been broadly negative. Florida, in particular, has been dominating the immigration news cycle with the passage and implementation of SB 1718, which, among other things, enhanced the power of state law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration laws.
While much of the focus has been on negative developments, other states have been taking great strides towards improving the immigration system. It is important to highlight these initiatives.
Of note, two states have recently made efforts to increase access to education for immigrant residents. One of these states is Minnesota, which has introduced HF 2073. The bill is currently in the legislative process, but if passed, it will provide additional funding to Minnesota State colleges and Universities, as well modifying existing grant programs. These changes include greater tuition assistance for low-income families, regardless of immigration status, which will enable tuition assistance for many who previously could not access these benefits due to immigration status. Similarly, the Utah State House passed HB 102, a bill that extends the application of in-state tuition rates at Utah universities for refugees, asylees, and humanitarian parolees. These changes stand to greatly reduce the tuition prices for these groups in higher education, allowing these individuals to enhance their own education as well as gain knowledge and skills for use in the workforce.
In addition to increasing access to higher education, several states are looking to immigration reform to address gaps in the labor market. For example, Maryland has removed a statewide requirement for permanent residency in order to obtain licensure, allowing qualified non-immigrant residents to practice medicine and ultimately, help alleviate the workforce shortage in the medical care field. Similarly, Tennessee passed SB 1451, which facilitates the process of acquiring U.S. medical licenses for professionals who were educated and trained in other countries and under different systems. Arizona, meanwhile, has passed SB 1563, which creates a new committee to study the unnecessary barriers to entry into the workforce facing new Americans, with the goal of facilitating entry into the workforce and ultimately, strong contributions to the national economy.
In the absence of comprehensive, sweeping immigration reform at the federal level, we are seeing an increased trend of states taking action regarding this field of law which has traditionally been dominated by federal policy and enforcement. We will continue to monitor changes on a state-by-state basis at the forefront of immigration reform.
If you have any questions about what this means for you, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys.
We look forward to working with you.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.

An artist receives an invitation to join a new production. A business professional is offered a consulting role alongside an existing position. A musician wants to perform for several organizers during the same season. For professionals whose careers involve multiple projects, an important immigration question often follows: can an O-1B visa cover work for more than one employer? The answer can be yes, but the employment arrangements must be covered by the appropriate petition structure. An O-1B approval does not provide unrestricted permission to accept any job in the United States. Your approved work arrangements matter The O-1B category allows qualifying individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement to work in their area of expertise. However, eligibility based on professional accomplishments is only part of the case. The petition must also establish the proposed work and the relationship between the professional and the petitioner. Before accepting an additional position, your attorney should review who filed the existing petition, the work it covers, and how the proposed opportunity fits into that arrangement. A valid visa and an unexpired approval notice do not answer those questions on their own. Separate employers or an agent petition When an O-1B beneficiary works for multiple employers during the same period, each employer generally files a separate petition unless an established U.S. agent files a petition covering the arrangement. An agent petition can be useful when a professional’s work involves several employers or engagements. Depending on the arrangement, the agent may act as an actual employer as well or only represent the employers and the professional. The petition must document the agent’s role and the proposed employment. For an agent petition involving multiple employers, the supporting documents include contracts and an itinerary identifying the engagements, their dates, the actual employers, and the locations where services will be performed. Your attorney will determine the documentation needed for your particular structure. A new opportunity may require another filing If you change employers while in the United States, a new petition is generally required. When the original case was filed through an agent, an amended petition may be necessary to address the new employer. Material changes to the approved employment terms can also require an amendment. There is a specific provision allowing petitioners for artists and entertainers to add qualifying performances or engagements during the petition’s validity without an amended petition. That flexibility should not be treated as blanket permission to change employers or accept unrelated work. Your attorney should assess whether it applies to the proposed engagement. Review the opportunity before agreeing to a start date A promising offer can come with a short deadline. Sharing the proposed contract, duties, employer information, and anticipated dates with your attorney early can help clarify the immigration requirements before business commitments are made. Your attorney will confirm whether the work is already covered, whether another petition is needed, and when you may begin. Do not assume that submitting a new petition automatically authorizes work for the new employer. Contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. If you believe you may qualify for the O-1B status and to discuss a filing strategy that fits your professional plans.

Receiving a two-year green card through marriage is an important step, but it leaves another process ahead: removing the conditions on permanent residence. For couples preparing a joint Form I-751 petition, understanding the filing window and organizing evidence early can make the preparation more manageable. The starting point is your own record. Locate the green card, the notice granting residence, and copies of the earlier immigration filing. Check the date conditional residence began and the card’s expiration date. Do not calculate the next deadline solely from your wedding anniversary or the date an attorney first submitted your case. Understand the joint filing window Under 8 CFR 216.4 , a joint I-751 petition generally must be filed during the 90-day period immediately before the second anniversary of obtaining conditional permanent residence. This is a window before that anniversary, not an additional 90 days after the card expires. Preparing early and filing early are different things. You can begin gathering records well before the window opens, while coordinating the correct submission date with your attorney. A joint petition also requires the appropriate signatures, fee, and supporting documentation. Confirm the current form instructions, accepted filing method, and applicable fee when the case is ready to submit. Build a record of the marriage over time The regulation identifies several types of evidence that may help show the marriage was not entered into to evade immigration law: jointly owned property, a lease for a shared home, combined financial resources, children’s birth certificates, and statements from people with personal knowledge of the relationship. These examples do not mean every couple must have a mortgage, joint accounts, or children. The evidence should accurately reflect your circumstances. A clear explanation of how you manage your household can be more useful than forcing your relationship into a checklist that does not fit. As a practical preparation step, organize records by date and type. Review whether they help explain the course of the marriage, rather than collecting only documents created shortly before filing. Flag separate addresses, name changes, or gaps in the records for your attorney. Never alter a document to make the history appear simpler. Tell your attorney if circumstances change This article addresses joint filing. Divorce, the death of a spouse, abuse, or other significant changes may require a different filing basis or an individualized assessment. Separate waiver provisions exist, with their own requirements. A spouse’s unwillingness to sign does not, by itself, establish eligibility for every waiver. Do not assume that the joint 90-day window answers every question about a non-joint case. If the relationship changes while preparing the petition or while it is pending, inform counsel promptly. You should not need to invent a continuing relationship to seek advice about the options that may actually apply. Keep tracking the case after submission The regulation provides that conditional resident status is automatically extended, when necessary, upon receipt of a properly filed I-751 until adjudication. Proof of that status is a separate practical matter: keep the receipt notice and have counsel review its wording before relying on it for travel or employment documentation. This article does not promise a particular receipt-extension period or processing time. A missed deadline calls for prompt legal attention. The regulation allows some late joint filings where USCIS accepts a written showing of good cause, but acceptance is not automatic. Do not assume a late petition cures the problem without further review. Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. can help you assess the filing window, organize relevant evidence, and identify changes that may affect your I-751 strategy. Contact the firm early enough to review the facts before the deadline approaches.

October begins a new federal fiscal year, but that does not mean every green card applicant moves to the front of the line. The Department of State’s October 2026 Visa Bulletin sets out the visa availability that applicants in family-sponsored and employment-based preference categories need to review this month.

