Créer des opportunités: Visas américains pour les chefs, les boulangers et les artisans culinaires

Angelica Rice • May 2, 2025

 Click here to read this article in English

Si vous avez toujours rêvé d'apporter votre art culinaire aux États-Unis  - que ce soit en tant que chef dans une cuisine haut de gamme, artisan pâtissier concevant des chefs-d'œuvre comestibles ou boulanger présentant des recettes familiales séculaires aux dîners américains - il existe peut-être un visa qui vous convient aussi bien que votre tablier préféré.


Dans le monde dynamique de l'immigration américaine, deux options sont particulièrement intéressantes pour les professionnels de la cuisine : le visa O-1B et le visa P-3. Alors que beaucoup pensent que ces visas sont réservés aux stars d'Hollywood ou aux musiciens folkloriques, la réalité est qu'ils ont ouvert des portes à des professionnels créatifs dans tous les domaines, y compris ceux dont le médium est la saveur.


Commençons par le visa O-1B. Ce visa est destiné aux personnes ayant des « capacités extraordinaires » dans le domaine des arts, que l'USCIS définit comme des personnes s'étant distinguées par leur renommée nationale ou internationale. Il s'agit d'un coup de projecteur sur vos réalisations, que vous ayez fait l'objet d'articles dans des magazines culinaires, que vous ayez été la tête d'affiche de festivals gastronomiques, que vous ayez travaillé dans des cuisines renommées ou que vous ayez reçu les éloges de critiques et de chefs respectés. Vous n'avez pas besoin d'une étoile Michelin (même si cela ne fait pas de mal) - il vous suffit de prouver que vos compétences et votre réputation vous placent dans une classe à part. Ce visa vous permet de travailler aux États-Unis pendant trois ans au maximum, avec la possibilité de prolonger votre séjour si vous continuez à faire des merveilles.


Si votre passion est de préserver et de partager votre héritage culturel par le biais de la cuisine, le visa P-3 est peut-être mieux adapté. Conçu pour les artistes et les animateurs qui viennent aux États-Unis pour se produire, enseigner ou entraîner dans le cadre d'un programme « culturellement unique », le visa P-3 est parfait pour les chefs cuisiniers formés aux méthodes traditionnelles qui souhaitent introduire des saveurs ethniques authentiques sur les tables américaines. Par exemple, un maître japonais du sushi enseignant des techniques régionales dans des écoles culinaires, un chef français recréant les plats rustiques de Provence dans un restaurant de la ferme à la table en Californie, ou un boulanger italien apportant des spécialités régionales comme la cassata sicilienne ou les maritozzi romains dans une boulangerie de Brooklyn. Selon l'USCIS, le programme doit viser à « faire progresser la compréhension ou le développement de votre forme d'art » et peut être de nature commerciale ou non commerciale. Le visa dure un an et peut être prolongé.


Pourquoi ces options sont-elles si avantageuses pour les professionnels de la cuisine ? Tout d'abord, elles permettent d'éviter les longs délais et les complexités de la certification de la main-d'œuvre. Elles sont plus rapides, plus abordables et permettent à votre talent - ou à votre tradition - de s'exprimer. À une époque où les Américains sont de plus en plus friands de saveurs mondiales authentiques, la présence d'un expert autochtone dans la cuisine n'est pas seulement une tendance, c'est une expérience. Et le système d'immigration américain est en train de s'en rendre compte.

Au cabinet Santos Lloyd, nous avons aidé d'innombrables professionnels de la cuisine à trouver le visa correspondant à leurs rêves. Que votre histoire soit écrite en safran et en fumée ou en farine et en sucre, nous sommes là pour vous aider à lui donner vie aux États-Unis.Vous êtes prêt à lancer votre carrière aux États-Unis ? Contactez-nous pour commencer, car votre prochain chapitre n'est peut-être qu'à un visa de vous.

Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

Angelica Rice

Stirring Up Opportunity: U.S. Visas for Chefs, Bakers, and Culinary Artisans

By Angelica Rice • May 2, 2025
If you’ve ever dreamed of bringing your culinary artistry to the United States —whether as a chef in a high-end kitchen, a pastry artisan designing edible masterpieces, or a baker introducing centuries-old family recipes to American diners—there may be a visa that fits you as well as your favorite apron. In the vibrant world of U.S. immigration, two options shine particularly bright for culinary professionals: the O-1B and the P-3 visa. While many assume these are only for Hollywood stars or folk musicians, the reality is that they’ve opened doors for creative professionals across fields—including those whose medium is flavor. Let’s start with the O-1B visa . This visa is for individuals with “extraordinary ability” in the arts, which USCIS defines as someone who has achieved distinction through national or international acclaim. Think of it as a spotlight on your achievements—whether you’ve been featured in culinary magazines, headlined food festivals, worked in renowned kitchens, or garnered praise from respected critics and chefs. You don’t need a Michelin star (though it doesn’t hurt)—you just need to prove that your skill and reputation put you in a class above the rest. With this visa, you can work in the U.S. for up to three years, with the possibility of extensions if you're still cooking up success. Now, if your passion lies in preserving and sharing your cultural heritage through cuisine, the P-3 visa may be the better fit. Designed for artists and entertainers coming to the U.S. to perform, teach, or coach as part of a “culturally unique” program, the P-3 visa is perfect for chefs trained in traditional methods who want to introduce authentic ethnic flavors to American tables. For example, a Japanese sushi master teaching regional techniques at culinary schools, a French chef recreating the rustic dishes of Provence in a farm-to-table restaurant in California, or an Italian baker bringing regional specialties like Sicilian cassata or Roman maritozzi to a bakery in Brooklyn. According to USCIS, the program must aim to “further the understanding or development of your art form,” and can be commercial or noncommercial in nature. The visa lasts for one year, with extensions available. So why are these options such a win for culinary professionals? For one, they bypass the long timelines and complexities of labor certification. They’re faster, more affordable, and allow your talent—or your tradition—to speak for itself. In an era where Americans are increasingly craving authentic global flavors, having a native expert in the kitchen isn’t just a trend—it’s an experience. And the U.S. immigration system is catching on. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we’ve helped countless culinary professionals find the right visa to match their dreams. Whether your story is written in saffron and smoke or flour and sugar, we’re here to help you bring it to life in the United States. Ready to take your career stateside? Contact us to get started—because your next chapter may be just one visa away.

Enhanced Vetting at Consulates and U.S. Ports of Entry: What You Need to Know

By Juliana LaMendola • April 25, 2025
In recent months, the U.S. government has intensified its vetting procedures for individuals seeking entry into the United States, whether through visa applications abroad or inspection at ports of entry. This shift, prioritized by the current administration, is having a noticeable impact on immigrants, visa holders, and even lawful permanent residents (LPRs). At U.S. consulates worldwide, applicants are experiencing increased delays , often being placed into administrative processing under Section 221(g) or referred for Security Advisory Opinions (SAOs) , which can significantly prolong visa issuance. Officers are now engaging in deeper reviews of applicants' backgrounds, including their t ravel histories, social media accounts, and foreign ties . This scrutiny applies to a wide range of visa categories, from visitor visas to employment-based petitions. Importantly, officers are exercising broader discretion when deciding who qualifies for a visa, making the process more unpredictable, even for applicants with strong cases. This enhanced vetting does not end at the consulate. Individuals entering the U.S. — even those with valid visas or green cards — are increasingly subject to prolonged secondary inspections by Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Officers may ask detailed questions about prior immigration history, travel patterns, and social media activity. In some cases, travelers are asked to provide access to their electronic devices for further inspection. There are also growing reports of travelers being referred to deferred inspection or even issued a Notice to Appear (NTA) for removal proceedings, despite previously lawful entries. While some of these practices have existed in the past, the current administration has formalized and expanded them. Experts warn that additional travel restrictions or targeted bans could also emerge as part of the administration’s enforcement priorities. For employment-based applicants, these delays and complications can severely impact U.S. businesses and foreign nationals who contribute critical skills to the U.S. economy. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared before attending a visa interview or traveling internationally. Understanding your rights and preparing thoroughly can help you navigate this uncertain landscape. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. , our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, supported, and protected. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.

USCIS Gender Policy Shift Raises Concerns for Asylum Applicants Based on Gender Identity

By Angelica Rice • April 17, 2025
On March 31, 2024, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) implemented a policy update that limits gender marker selections on all immigration forms and systems to two biological sexes: male and female. This change eliminates the option for applicants to select a non-binary or “X” gender marker—an option that had previously been permitted on some forms. While USCIS emphasizes that this update does not change who qualifies for immigration benefits, it may significantly impact how certain applications—particularly asylum claims based on gender identity-related persecution—are understood and evaluated. What Has Changed? Under the revised policy, applicants may now only choose “Male” or “Female” when completing USCIS forms. The ability to select a non-binary or third-gender option is no longer available. Applicants may still request to change their gender marker with USCIS, but only within the male/female binary. Supporting documentation, such as medical or legal records, is not required to make the change. This means that transgender individuals can still align their gender marker with their identity—if it falls within the two binary categories—but non-binary individuals are no longer represented. The change follows guidance issued by the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which called for greater consistency in the collection of sex and gender data across federal agencies. Impact on Asylum Applicants This policy update is especially important for individuals applying for asylum based on persecution related to their gender identity. Under U.S. immigration law, asylum is available to people who have suffered persecution—or fear future persecution—based on their membership in a “particular social group.” This includes people targeted for being transgender, gender non-conforming, or otherwise not aligning with socially expected gender roles in their home country. Although the legal standard for asylum remains unchanged, the removal of the non-binary gender marker could make it harder for some applicants to clearly present and document their identity. In asylum cases, credibility and clarity are crucial. The ability to accurately reflect one’s gender identity on official forms can play an important role in establishing the foundation of a persecution claim. Now, applicants who identify as non-binary or outside the traditional male/female categories may be forced to select a gender that does not align with their lived experience. This could lead to confusion in their case file or require additional explanation during interviews or hearings. This policy could weaken the strength of some asylum claims—not because the underlying facts have changed, but because the official forms now fail to reflect the applicant’s true identity. For example: A non-binary person applying for asylum after being targeted in their home country may now have to select “Male” or “Female” on their asylum application, despite not identifying as either. This mismatch may lead adjudicators to question the applicant’s identity, possibly weakening the strength of the claim or requiring added clarification and documentation. In defensive asylum cases—where applicants are in removal proceedings—such inconsistencies could create unnecessary hurdles and complicate the evidentiary presentation. What Can Applicants Do? Despite the change, individuals can still pursue asylum based on gender identity. The underlying eligibility criteria remain the same. However, applicants should be prepared to clearly explain any differences between their stated identity and the gender marker required on USCIS forms. Applicants are encouraged to: Include a personal declaration explaining their gender identity in detail and how it relates to their fear of persecution. Provide evidence such as affidavits, country condition reports, or expert testimony that supports the claim. Work with an experienced immigration attorney who can help present the claim effectively and prepare for any questions that might arise from the new form limitations. The new USCIS policy on gender markers may seem like a technical update, but for asylum seekers fleeing gender-based persecution, it has real implications. While individuals are still legally eligible to seek protection, the limitation to binary gender options could make it more difficult to fully and clearly present their case.  If you or someone you know is facing immigration challenges related to gender identity—or is concerned about how this policy may impact an asylum claim—please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced immigration attorneys. We’re here to help ensure your voice is heard and your case is handled with the care and expertise it deserves.
Show More