Entender la Ley Laken Riley: Un punto de inflexión en la aplicación de la ley de inmigración estadounidense
Denice Flores • June 5, 2025
Click here to read this article in English
En enero de 2025, el Congreso de Estados Unidos aprobó la Ley Laken Riley, que supuso un cambio significativo en la política de aplicación de las leyes de inmigración.
Esta ley obliga al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) a detener determinados ciudadanos no estadounidenses
que hayan sido detenidos por delitos relacionados con el hurto, como robo con allanamiento de morada, hurto, latrocinio o hurto en tiendas.
En virtud de esta ley, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional debe detener a una persona que:
(1)
se encuentra ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos o no poseía los documentos necesarios al solicitar la admisión; y
(2)
haya sido acusado, arrestado, condenado o admita haber cometido actos que constituyan los elementos esenciales de robo, hurto, latrocinio o hurto en tiendas.
La ley también autoriza a los estados a demandar al gobierno federal por decisiones o supuestos fallos relacionados con la aplicación de la ley de inmigración. Autoriza a los gobiernos estatales a demandar medidas cautelares por determinadas decisiones o supuestos incumplimientos del gobierno federal relacionados con la inmigración si la decisión o el incumplimiento causan un perjuicio al estado o a sus residentes, incluido un perjuicio económico superior a 100 dólares. En concreto, el gobierno estatal puede demandar al gobierno federal por:
- Decisión de poner en libertad a un ciudadano no estadounidense;
- Incumplimiento de los requisitos relativos a la inspección de las personas que solicitan la admisión en Estados Unidos, incluidos los requisitos relativos a las entrevistas de asilo;
- Incumplimiento del requisito de dejar de expedir visados a nacionales de un país que deniegue o retrase injustificadamente la admisión de nacionales de ese país;
- Incumplimiento de las limitaciones a la libertad condicional para inmigrantes, como el requisito de que la libertad condicional sólo se conceda caso por caso; o
- No detener a una persona cuya expulsión de Estados Unidos haya sido ordenada.
Los estrictos requisitos de detención de la ley pueden aumentar el miedo y la incertidumbre en las comunidades de inmigrantes. Las personas simplemente acusadas de determinados delitos podrían ser objeto de detención obligatoria. La ley también puede afectar a los procesos de inmigración legal. El aumento de las detenciones y deportaciones podría sobrecargar los recursos y provocar retrasos en la tramitación de visados y solicitudes de asilo.
Dada la evolución del panorama jurídico:
- Manténgase informado y/o busque asesoramiento legal - Consulte con su abogado de inmigración para entender cómo las nuevas leyes y políticas pueden afectar a su situación y si usted o alguien que conoce se enfrenta a problemas legales relacionados con la inmigración.
- Conozca sus derechos- Familiarícese con sus derechos legales, especialmente en lo que respecta a las interacciones con las fuerzas del orden y las autoridades de inmigración.
- Participe en organizaciones comunitarias que ofrezcan apoyo y recursos a los inmigrantes, fomentando una red de asistencia y defensa.
Si usted tiene alguna pregunta o desea consultar con un abogado de inmigración con experiencia, póngase en contacto con nuestra oficina para programar una consulta.
Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major change to the H-1B cap selection process. Under a final rule issued on December 29, 2025, USCIS will replace the long-standing random H-1B lottery with a wage-weighted selection system that favors higher-paid and more complex positions. The rule is scheduled to take effect on February 27, 2026 , just ahead of the fiscal year 2027 H-1B cap registration season, unless delayed by legal challenges. If implemented, USCIS is expected to release additional guidance explaining how employers must submit registrations under the revised process. This change marks one of the most significant reforms to the H-1B program in recent years. Up until 2025, all registrations were treated equally once the annual cap was reached. Under the new system, selection odds will be tied to wage levels based on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics data. All H-1B registrations will still be placed into a single selection pool, but registrations tied to higher wage levels will receive multiple entries into that pool, increasing their likelihood of selection. Lower wage levels will receive fewer entries, making selection less likely but not impossible. H-1B wage levels are not determined solely by salary. Each wage level reflects the complexity of the job, the level of responsibility involved, and the education and experience required . Entry-level positions involving routine duties and close supervision are generally classified at the lowest wage level, while positions requiring independent judgment, advanced skills, and significant responsibility fall into higher wage levels. The highest wage level is reserved for roles that involve expert knowledge, strategic decision-making, and substantial leadership or technical authority. USCIS is expected to closely scrutinize selected petitions to ensure that the wage level claimed during registration is supported by the job duties and salary offered in the petition. Any discrepancies between the registration and the petition may result in requests for evidence, denials, or enforcement action. With the elimination of the purely random lottery, employers should begin preparing early by carefully evaluating job descriptions, wage levels, and overall H-1B strategy. Accurate classification and thoughtful planning will be essential under this new wage-based selection system. If you are an employer considering H-1B sponsorship, or a foreign professional wondering whether your position may qualify under the new wage-based system, consulting with experienced immigration counsel is more important than ever. Santos Lloyd Law is actively advising clients on H-1B cap registrations and strategy under the new rules. To discuss your options or determine whether you may qualify, contact our office to schedule a consultation.

During the recent administration there has been an increase in issuance of Requests for Evidence for EB-1A petitions for those of Extraordinary Ability. A Request for Evidence is a request that is made by USCIS that should explain how the evidence is deficient in proving the criteria argued and what additional evidence needs to be provided by the applicant to meet the criteria. EB-1A petitions are already normally subject to higher scrutiny because their approval is the first step needed to apply for Lawful Permanent Residence or a green card. USCIS normally requires not just evidence but that the evidence be provided with context and information to show why it matters in a particular field. For example, if you were providing evidence of your membership in an organization that requires outstanding achievements of its members, just providing evidence of the membership is not enough. You must explain what that membership is and provide background information on the organization granting the membership. You also need to provide evidence on the criteria that is used to select the members, information on those who select the members to show that they are recognized experts, other documentation such as articles about the membership organization to show its importance, and any other relevant evidence and background information to show that the criteria is met. A request for evidence being issued prior to the current administration was not uncommon, but in the current climate it is more surprising to not receive a request for evidence for this type of case. It is important to remember that a request for evidence is not a denial. Depending on the validity of the information in the request and the substance some Requests for Evidence can be overcome, and the case be approved. It is important to carefully review the request and note if there are any errors in the content and application of the regulations by USCIS. If you have an attorney, you should work with them and make sure that you provide any evidence you think may be helpful. Although there is a deadline by which a response must be submitted, attention to detail and patience will go a long way when dealing with having to respond to a request for evidence. If you believe you may qualify for this type of visa, please feel free to contact our office.

Once you have connected with a college program, have been admitted to the school, and deemed eligible to compete athletically, you will need to secure an F-1 student visa in order to actually attend your new college and begin your time as a student athlete. The first step in the visa process is to receive your Form I-2

