Entender la Ley Laken Riley: Un punto de inflexión en la aplicación de la ley de inmigración estadounidense
Denice Flores • June 5, 2025
Click here to read this article in English
En enero de 2025, el Congreso de Estados Unidos aprobó la Ley Laken Riley, que supuso un cambio significativo en la política de aplicación de las leyes de inmigración.
Esta ley obliga al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) a detener determinados ciudadanos no estadounidenses
que hayan sido detenidos por delitos relacionados con el hurto, como robo con allanamiento de morada, hurto, latrocinio o hurto en tiendas.
En virtud de esta ley, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional debe detener a una persona que:
(1)
se encuentra ilegalmente en los Estados Unidos o no poseía los documentos necesarios al solicitar la admisión; y
(2)
haya sido acusado, arrestado, condenado o admita haber cometido actos que constituyan los elementos esenciales de robo, hurto, latrocinio o hurto en tiendas.
La ley también autoriza a los estados a demandar al gobierno federal por decisiones o supuestos fallos relacionados con la aplicación de la ley de inmigración. Autoriza a los gobiernos estatales a demandar medidas cautelares por determinadas decisiones o supuestos incumplimientos del gobierno federal relacionados con la inmigración si la decisión o el incumplimiento causan un perjuicio al estado o a sus residentes, incluido un perjuicio económico superior a 100 dólares. En concreto, el gobierno estatal puede demandar al gobierno federal por:
- Decisión de poner en libertad a un ciudadano no estadounidense;
- Incumplimiento de los requisitos relativos a la inspección de las personas que solicitan la admisión en Estados Unidos, incluidos los requisitos relativos a las entrevistas de asilo;
- Incumplimiento del requisito de dejar de expedir visados a nacionales de un país que deniegue o retrase injustificadamente la admisión de nacionales de ese país;
- Incumplimiento de las limitaciones a la libertad condicional para inmigrantes, como el requisito de que la libertad condicional sólo se conceda caso por caso; o
- No detener a una persona cuya expulsión de Estados Unidos haya sido ordenada.
Los estrictos requisitos de detención de la ley pueden aumentar el miedo y la incertidumbre en las comunidades de inmigrantes. Las personas simplemente acusadas de determinados delitos podrían ser objeto de detención obligatoria. La ley también puede afectar a los procesos de inmigración legal. El aumento de las detenciones y deportaciones podría sobrecargar los recursos y provocar retrasos en la tramitación de visados y solicitudes de asilo.
Dada la evolución del panorama jurídico:
- Manténgase informado y/o busque asesoramiento legal - Consulte con su abogado de inmigración para entender cómo las nuevas leyes y políticas pueden afectar a su situación y si usted o alguien que conoce se enfrenta a problemas legales relacionados con la inmigración.
- Conozca sus derechos- Familiarícese con sus derechos legales, especialmente en lo que respecta a las interacciones con las fuerzas del orden y las autoridades de inmigración.
- Participe en organizaciones comunitarias que ofrezcan apoyo y recursos a los inmigrantes, fomentando una red de asistencia y defensa.
Si usted tiene alguna pregunta o desea consultar con un abogado de inmigración con experiencia, póngase en contacto con nuestra oficina para programar una consulta.
Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea

In January 2025, the U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act , marking a significant shift in immigration enforcement policy. The Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain certain non-U.S. nationals who have been arrested for theft-related offenses such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. Under this Act, the Department of Homeland Security must detain an individual who: (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The Act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. It authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a: Decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; Failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; Failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; Violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or Failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States. The Act's stringent detention requirements may lead to increased fear and uncertainty within immigrant communities. Individuals who are merely accused of certain crimes could face mandatory detention. The Act may also affect legal immigration processes. Increased detention and deportation efforts could strain resources, potentially leading to delays in processing visas and asylum applications. Given the evolving legal landscape: Stay Informed and/or Seek Legal Counsel - Consult with your immigration attorney to understand how new laws and policies may affect your situation and if you or someone you know is facing immigration-related legal issues. Know Your Rights - Familiarize yourself with your legal rights, especially concerning interactions with law enforcement and immigration authorities. Community Engagement - Participate in community organizations that provide support and resources for immigrants, fostering a network of assistance and advocacy. If you have any questions or would like to consult with an experienced immigration attorney, contact our office to schedule a consultation.

In a renewed wave of enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has started sending formal alerts to certain F-1 students participating in Optional Practical Training (OPT), flagging that their records reflect over 90 days without any reported employment. These students have been advised to update their employment status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) within 15 days. Failure to take timely corrective action may lead to the termination of the student's SEVIS record, effectively marking them as out of status, and may ultimately trigger removal proceedings. The notices are intended as a warning that students who do not comply with OPT reporting obligations are at risk of serious immigration consequences. Understanding OPT and Its Unemployment Limits Optional Practical Training (commonly referred to as “OPT”) is a work authorization benefit that allows eligible F-1 international students to gain hands-on experience in their field of study. Students may apply for pre-completion OPT (while still in school) or post-completion OPT (after graduation), typically for up to 12 months. Those with degrees in qualifying STEM fields may apply for an additional 24-month STEM OPT extension, giving them a total of 36 months of work authorization in the U.S. To maintain valid F-1 status while on OPT, students must remain actively employed in a position related to their field of study. The amount of time a student may remain in the United States while on OPT without being properly employed is capped at: 90 days during the standard 12-month post-completion OPT, and 150 days for those on the STEM OPT extension, which includes any days of unemployment accrued during the initial OPT period. These unemployment limits are cumulative and enforced strictly through SEVIS monitoring. What Should F-1 Students Do? If you are an F-1 student on OPT or STEM OPT and receive a warning or are unsure about your compliance status, act quickly: Contact your Designated School Official (DSO) immediately to review and, if necessary, update your SEVIS record. Ensure all employment is properly documented and reported through your school’s international office. Do not ignore warning notices, as failure to respond may lead to SEVIS termination and potentially the initiation of removal proceedings. It is also advisable to consult with a qualified immigration attorney to explore available options and understand how enforcement actions may affect your status or future immigration plans. If you received a notice or have questions about your F-1 status, our attorneys are here to help you take the right steps to protect your future in the United States. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., a full-service immigration law firm with global reach, is proud to announce the promotion of attorney Kris Quadros-Ragar, effective immediately. This marks a significant milestone, as Kris becomes the first Partner in the firm’s history, reflecting both her outstanding contributions and the firm’s long-term vision for growth and leadership development. Holding a Law Degree from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) in Brazil and a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree with a Business Law certificate from the University of Southern California (USC) Gould School of Law, Kris brings strong academic training to her legal work. As a California-licensed attorney, her international background and personal experience as an immigrant offer a distinct and valuable perspective to the firm’s global immigration practice. Kris is deeply committed to helping clients navigate the complexities of the U.S. immigration system, combining legal insight, strategic thinking, and empathy to support their goals. Her work has had a meaningful impact on the firm’s success and on the lives of the individuals and families she serves. As a full-service immigration law firm with a global mission, we recognize that strong, principled leadership is essential to advancing both our clients’ goals and our firm’s legacy. Kris’s promotion as our first Partner is a testament to her talent, integrity, and deep alignment with the values that define Santos Lloyd Law Firm: excellence, diversity, and innovation. Her insight and experience will play a vital role in expanding our services and maintaining the high standards our clients expect in business, sports, entertainment, and family immigration matters. Santos Lloyd Law Firm congratulates Kris on this well-deserved promotion and looks forward to her continued leadership in this new role.