How Does Receipt of Public Assistance Affect My Application for an Adjustment of Status (AOS)?
Kevin Swartz • February 4, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
The answer to this question changed considerably after President Biden rolled back some of former President Trump’s harsh immigration policies. In 2019, Trump had issued an executive order known as “The Public Charge Final Rule,” which caused the receipt of most public assistance programs to negatively impact AOS applications, and with few exceptions (e.g. emergency services and Medicaid recipients who were pregnant or under the age of 21).
Under the current administration, your receipt of public assistance may continue to negatively affect your AOS petition, but only under limited circumstances. It depends on 1) what your current immigration status is; 2) the type of public assistance you are receiving; and 3) what your personal circumstances are.
If your current immigration status is that of asylee or refugee, then your past or current receipt of public assistance will generally not affect your application for adjustment of status (AOS). If you are not an asylee or refugee, the following applies.
With respect to the type of assistance received, United States Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) will evaluate whether your past or current receipt of public assistance indicates that are likely to become a “public charge,” meaning someone who is primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. Your application will be denied if, at the time of your application, USCIS finds that you are currently a public charge or will likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
In making its determination, USCIS may consider only certain factors, however: the extent to which you relied on 1) public assistance for income maintenance; and 2) whether you have required long-term care in an institution at the government’s expense. The following types of public assistance fall within the first category (public assistance for income maintenance) and will negatively affect your application in certain situations:
- Supplemental security income (SSI);
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance; state and local cash assistance programs that provide benefits for income maintenance (often called ‘general assistance’ programs);
- Programs to support applicants who are institutionalized for long-term care, e.g. in a nursing home or mental health institution)
The longer you rely on cash assistance or institutional care listed above, the more heavily USCIS will weigh it against your application. But, even if you have relied on one of the public assistance programs listed above, or required long-term institutional care for a period of time, USCIS may not necessarily deny your AOS application. USCIS is required to evaluate this information within the context of the totality of all your personal circumstances. Your personal circumstances include many different factors, including but not limited to: your age, health, family situation, financial status, the resources available to you, education, and vocational skills.
If you received non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care) or special-purpose cash benefits that were not for income maintenance, USCIS will not weigh that against you. The following is a non-exhaustive list of non-cash benefits that will not negatively affect your application:
- Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of communicable diseases;
- Use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation services, and emergency medical services (other than support for long-term institutional care;
- Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP);
- Nutrition programs, including food stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency food assistance programs;
- Housing benefits;
- Child care services;
- Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP);
- Emergency disaster relief;
- Foster care and adoption assistance;
- Educational assistance, including benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or higher education;
- Community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
- State and local programs that are similar to the programs listed above
How will my AOS application be affected if my family member is the one who is receiving public assistance, not me?
If your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance, but not as their sole means of financial support, USCIS will not weigh that benefit against you in evaluating your application. But if your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance as their sole means of financial support, then USCIS will make a case-by-case determination. They will evaluate your family member’s public assistance along with the totality of your personal circumstances to determine whether you are likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
Can Trump’s old policy be reinstated if Biden loses the next election?
While it is very possible that the next republican administration may reject Biden’s current policy and once again disfavor AOS petitions from public assistance recipients, such a change will unlikely apply retroactively to AOS petitions filed during the current administration. Trump’s 2019 executive order, the “Public Charge Final Rule” applied only to applications that were filed on or after that executive order went into effect. Therefore, assuming the next Republican administration reissues the same executive order as Trump’s 2019 “Public Charge Final Rule,” that change will apply only to those petitions filed after that executive order is reissued.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced a major change to the H-1B cap selection process. Under a final rule issued on December 29, 2025, USCIS will replace the long-standing random H-1B lottery with a wage-weighted selection system that favors higher-paid and more complex positions. The rule is scheduled to take effect on February 27, 2026 , just ahead of the fiscal year 2027 H-1B cap registration season, unless delayed by legal challenges. If implemented, USCIS is expected to release additional guidance explaining how employers must submit registrations under the revised process. This change marks one of the most significant reforms to the H-1B program in recent years. Up until 2025, all registrations were treated equally once the annual cap was reached. Under the new system, selection odds will be tied to wage levels based on the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics data. All H-1B registrations will still be placed into a single selection pool, but registrations tied to higher wage levels will receive multiple entries into that pool, increasing their likelihood of selection. Lower wage levels will receive fewer entries, making selection less likely but not impossible. H-1B wage levels are not determined solely by salary. Each wage level reflects the complexity of the job, the level of responsibility involved, and the education and experience required . Entry-level positions involving routine duties and close supervision are generally classified at the lowest wage level, while positions requiring independent judgment, advanced skills, and significant responsibility fall into higher wage levels. The highest wage level is reserved for roles that involve expert knowledge, strategic decision-making, and substantial leadership or technical authority. USCIS is expected to closely scrutinize selected petitions to ensure that the wage level claimed during registration is supported by the job duties and salary offered in the petition. Any discrepancies between the registration and the petition may result in requests for evidence, denials, or enforcement action. With the elimination of the purely random lottery, employers should begin preparing early by carefully evaluating job descriptions, wage levels, and overall H-1B strategy. Accurate classification and thoughtful planning will be essential under this new wage-based selection system. If you are an employer considering H-1B sponsorship, or a foreign professional wondering whether your position may qualify under the new wage-based system, consulting with experienced immigration counsel is more important than ever. Santos Lloyd Law is actively advising clients on H-1B cap registrations and strategy under the new rules. To discuss your options or determine whether you may qualify, contact our office to schedule a consultation.
During the recent administration there has been an increase in issuance of Requests for Evidence for EB-1A petitions for those of Extraordinary Ability. A Request for Evidence is a request that is made by USCIS that should explain how the evidence is deficient in proving the criteria argued and what additional evidence needs to be provided by the applicant to meet the criteria. EB-1A petitions are already normally subject to higher scrutiny because their approval is the first step needed to apply for Lawful Permanent Residence or a green card. USCIS normally requires not just evidence but that the evidence be provided with context and information to show why it matters in a particular field. For example, if you were providing evidence of your membership in an organization that requires outstanding achievements of its members, just providing evidence of the membership is not enough. You must explain what that membership is and provide background information on the organization granting the membership. You also need to provide evidence on the criteria that is used to select the members, information on those who select the members to show that they are recognized experts, other documentation such as articles about the membership organization to show its importance, and any other relevant evidence and background information to show that the criteria is met. A request for evidence being issued prior to the current administration was not uncommon, but in the current climate it is more surprising to not receive a request for evidence for this type of case. It is important to remember that a request for evidence is not a denial. Depending on the validity of the information in the request and the substance some Requests for Evidence can be overcome, and the case be approved. It is important to carefully review the request and note if there are any errors in the content and application of the regulations by USCIS. If you have an attorney, you should work with them and make sure that you provide any evidence you think may be helpful. Although there is a deadline by which a response must be submitted, attention to detail and patience will go a long way when dealing with having to respond to a request for evidence. If you believe you may qualify for this type of visa, please feel free to contact our office.
