How Does Receipt of Public Assistance Affect My Application for an Adjustment of Status (AOS)?
Kevin Swartz • February 4, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
The answer to this question changed considerably after President Biden rolled back some of former President Trump’s harsh immigration policies. In 2019, Trump had issued an executive order known as “The Public Charge Final Rule,” which caused the receipt of most public assistance programs to negatively impact AOS applications, and with few exceptions (e.g. emergency services and Medicaid recipients who were pregnant or under the age of 21).
Under the current administration, your receipt of public assistance may continue to negatively affect your AOS petition, but only under limited circumstances. It depends on 1) what your current immigration status is; 2) the type of public assistance you are receiving; and 3) what your personal circumstances are.
If your current immigration status is that of asylee or refugee, then your past or current receipt of public assistance will generally not affect your application for adjustment of status (AOS). If you are not an asylee or refugee, the following applies.
With respect to the type of assistance received, United States Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) will evaluate whether your past or current receipt of public assistance indicates that are likely to become a “public charge,” meaning someone who is primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. Your application will be denied if, at the time of your application, USCIS finds that you are currently a public charge or will likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
In making its determination, USCIS may consider only certain factors, however: the extent to which you relied on 1) public assistance for income maintenance; and 2) whether you have required long-term care in an institution at the government’s expense. The following types of public assistance fall within the first category (public assistance for income maintenance) and will negatively affect your application in certain situations:
- Supplemental security income (SSI);
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance; state and local cash assistance programs that provide benefits for income maintenance (often called ‘general assistance’ programs);
- Programs to support applicants who are institutionalized for long-term care, e.g. in a nursing home or mental health institution)
The longer you rely on cash assistance or institutional care listed above, the more heavily USCIS will weigh it against your application. But, even if you have relied on one of the public assistance programs listed above, or required long-term institutional care for a period of time, USCIS may not necessarily deny your AOS application. USCIS is required to evaluate this information within the context of the totality of all your personal circumstances. Your personal circumstances include many different factors, including but not limited to: your age, health, family situation, financial status, the resources available to you, education, and vocational skills.
If you received non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care) or special-purpose cash benefits that were not for income maintenance, USCIS will not weigh that against you. The following is a non-exhaustive list of non-cash benefits that will not negatively affect your application:
- Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of communicable diseases;
- Use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation services, and emergency medical services (other than support for long-term institutional care;
- Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP);
- Nutrition programs, including food stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency food assistance programs;
- Housing benefits;
- Child care services;
- Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP);
- Emergency disaster relief;
- Foster care and adoption assistance;
- Educational assistance, including benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or higher education;
- Community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
- State and local programs that are similar to the programs listed above
How will my AOS application be affected if my family member is the one who is receiving public assistance, not me?
If your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance, but not as their sole means of financial support, USCIS will not weigh that benefit against you in evaluating your application. But if your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance as their sole means of financial support, then USCIS will make a case-by-case determination. They will evaluate your family member’s public assistance along with the totality of your personal circumstances to determine whether you are likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
Can Trump’s old policy be reinstated if Biden loses the next election?
While it is very possible that the next republican administration may reject Biden’s current policy and once again disfavor AOS petitions from public assistance recipients, such a change will unlikely apply retroactively to AOS petitions filed during the current administration. Trump’s 2019 executive order, the “Public Charge Final Rule” applied only to applications that were filed on or after that executive order went into effect. Therefore, assuming the next Republican administration reissues the same executive order as Trump’s 2019 “Public Charge Final Rule,” that change will apply only to those petitions filed after that executive order is reissued.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
The United States has long been a destination for the world’s most talented athletes—not only to compete at the highest level, but to access world-class training, coaching opportunities, and long-term career prospects. Whether on the field, in the ring, or across the chessboard, athletes from across the globe are finding immigration pathways that allow them to pursue their athletic and professional goals in the U.S. U.S. immigration law offers several visa and green card options designed specifically for individuals with extraordinary athletic talent. These include the P-1A visa for internationally recognized athletes, the O-1A visa for individuals of extraordinary ability, and the EB-1A immigrant petition, which can lead to permanent residency and ultimately, U.S. citizenship. The P-1A visa is commonly used by professional athletes coming to the U.S. to compete in a specific event or season. This applies not only to individual athletes but also to members of teams or clubs recognized internationally. It is widely used by soccer players, basketball players, MMA fighters, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competitors, and even elite chess players. Athletes must demonstrate a high level of international recognition and a record of performance in their sport. The O-1A visa is a strong option for coaches who demonstrate extraordinary ability, typically evidenced by championship titles, sustained winning records, or recognition as integral to their team’s success. To qualify, a coach must establish that their expertise places them among the small percentage of top professionals in their field. For athletes seeking permanent status in the U.S., the EB-1A immigrant petition —often referred to as the “extraordinary ability green card”—provides a direct path to lawful permanent residency. It requires clear documentation that the individual is among the very best in their sport and has achieved sustained national or international success. Unlike other green card categories, the EB-1A does not require employer sponsorship and can be self-petitioned. This has become a common path for MMA world champions, BJJ black belt medalists, Olympic athletes, and chess grandmasters—many of whom now represent the U.S. at the highest levels of international competition. It’s important to note that U.S. immigration law defines “athlete” broadly. Whether you are a professional football player in Europe, a sprinter from the Caribbean, a judoka, a gymnast, or a grandmaster in chess, your achievements may qualify under these categories if they are properly documented and presented. The key is a consistent record of excellence and recognition in your sport on a national or international scale. Our office specializes in these types of immigration matters. Whether you are an individual athlete looking to relocate or an organization seeking to bring international talent to your roster, we offer tailored legal strategies to support your goals. If you are exploring options to compete, train, or build your future in the U.S., we’re here to help you take the next step.
In January 2025, the U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act , marking a significant shift in immigration enforcement policy. The Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain certain non-U.S. nationals who have been arrested for theft-related offenses such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. Under this Act, the Department of Homeland Security must detain an individual who: (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The Act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. It authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a: Decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; Failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; Failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; Violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or Failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States. The Act's stringent detention requirements may lead to increased fear and uncertainty within immigrant communities. Individuals who are merely accused of certain crimes could face mandatory detention. The Act may also affect legal immigration processes. Increased detention and deportation efforts could strain resources, potentially leading to delays in processing visas and asylum applications. Given the evolving legal landscape: Stay Informed and/or Seek Legal Counsel - Consult with your immigration attorney to understand how new laws and policies may affect your situation and if you or someone you know is facing immigration-related legal issues. Know Your Rights - Familiarize yourself with your legal rights, especially concerning interactions with law enforcement and immigration authorities. Community Engagement - Participate in community organizations that provide support and resources for immigrants, fostering a network of assistance and advocacy. If you have any questions or would like to consult with an experienced immigration attorney, contact our office to schedule a consultation.
In a renewed wave of enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has started sending formal alerts to certain F-1 students participating in Optional Practical Training (OPT), flagging that their records reflect over 90 days without any reported employment. These students have been advised to update their employment status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) within 15 days. Failure to take timely corrective action may lead to the termination of the student's SEVIS record, effectively marking them as out of status, and may ultimately trigger removal proceedings. The notices are intended as a warning that students who do not comply with OPT reporting obligations are at risk of serious immigration consequences. Understanding OPT and Its Unemployment Limits Optional Practical Training (commonly referred to as “OPT”) is a work authorization benefit that allows eligible F-1 international students to gain hands-on experience in their field of study. Students may apply for pre-completion OPT (while still in school) or post-completion OPT (after graduation), typically for up to 12 months. Those with degrees in qualifying STEM fields may apply for an additional 24-month STEM OPT extension, giving them a total of 36 months of work authorization in the U.S. To maintain valid F-1 status while on OPT, students must remain actively employed in a position related to their field of study. The amount of time a student may remain in the United States while on OPT without being properly employed is capped at: 90 days during the standard 12-month post-completion OPT, and 150 days for those on the STEM OPT extension, which includes any days of unemployment accrued during the initial OPT period. These unemployment limits are cumulative and enforced strictly through SEVIS monitoring. What Should F-1 Students Do? If you are an F-1 student on OPT or STEM OPT and receive a warning or are unsure about your compliance status, act quickly: Contact your Designated School Official (DSO) immediately to review and, if necessary, update your SEVIS record. Ensure all employment is properly documented and reported through your school’s international office. Do not ignore warning notices, as failure to respond may lead to SEVIS termination and potentially the initiation of removal proceedings. It is also advisable to consult with a qualified immigration attorney to explore available options and understand how enforcement actions may affect your status or future immigration plans. If you received a notice or have questions about your F-1 status, our attorneys are here to help you take the right steps to protect your future in the United States. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
