How Does Receipt of Public Assistance Affect My Application for an Adjustment of Status (AOS)?
Kevin Swartz • February 4, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
The answer to this question changed considerably after President Biden rolled back some of former President Trump’s harsh immigration policies. In 2019, Trump had issued an executive order known as “The Public Charge Final Rule,” which caused the receipt of most public assistance programs to negatively impact AOS applications, and with few exceptions (e.g. emergency services and Medicaid recipients who were pregnant or under the age of 21).
Under the current administration, your receipt of public assistance may continue to negatively affect your AOS petition, but only under limited circumstances. It depends on 1) what your current immigration status is; 2) the type of public assistance you are receiving; and 3) what your personal circumstances are.
If your current immigration status is that of asylee or refugee, then your past or current receipt of public assistance will generally not affect your application for adjustment of status (AOS). If you are not an asylee or refugee, the following applies.
With respect to the type of assistance received, United States Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) will evaluate whether your past or current receipt of public assistance indicates that are likely to become a “public charge,” meaning someone who is primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. Your application will be denied if, at the time of your application, USCIS finds that you are currently a public charge or will likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
In making its determination, USCIS may consider only certain factors, however: the extent to which you relied on 1) public assistance for income maintenance; and 2) whether you have required long-term care in an institution at the government’s expense. The following types of public assistance fall within the first category (public assistance for income maintenance) and will negatively affect your application in certain situations:
- Supplemental security income (SSI);
- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash assistance; state and local cash assistance programs that provide benefits for income maintenance (often called ‘general assistance’ programs);
- Programs to support applicants who are institutionalized for long-term care, e.g. in a nursing home or mental health institution)
The longer you rely on cash assistance or institutional care listed above, the more heavily USCIS will weigh it against your application. But, even if you have relied on one of the public assistance programs listed above, or required long-term institutional care for a period of time, USCIS may not necessarily deny your AOS application. USCIS is required to evaluate this information within the context of the totality of all your personal circumstances. Your personal circumstances include many different factors, including but not limited to: your age, health, family situation, financial status, the resources available to you, education, and vocational skills.
If you received non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care) or special-purpose cash benefits that were not for income maintenance, USCIS will not weigh that against you. The following is a non-exhaustive list of non-cash benefits that will not negatively affect your application:
- Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of communicable diseases;
- Use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation services, and emergency medical services (other than support for long-term institutional care;
- Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP);
- Nutrition programs, including food stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency food assistance programs;
- Housing benefits;
- Child care services;
- Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP);
- Emergency disaster relief;
- Foster care and adoption assistance;
- Educational assistance, including benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or higher education;
- Community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
- State and local programs that are similar to the programs listed above
How will my AOS application be affected if my family member is the one who is receiving public assistance, not me?
If your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance, but not as their sole means of financial support, USCIS will not weigh that benefit against you in evaluating your application. But if your family member currently or previously relied on public assistance as their sole means of financial support, then USCIS will make a case-by-case determination. They will evaluate your family member’s public assistance along with the totality of your personal circumstances to determine whether you are likely to become a public charge at some point in the future.
Can Trump’s old policy be reinstated if Biden loses the next election?
While it is very possible that the next republican administration may reject Biden’s current policy and once again disfavor AOS petitions from public assistance recipients, such a change will unlikely apply retroactively to AOS petitions filed during the current administration. Trump’s 2019 executive order, the “Public Charge Final Rule” applied only to applications that were filed on or after that executive order went into effect. Therefore, assuming the next Republican administration reissues the same executive order as Trump’s 2019 “Public Charge Final Rule,” that change will apply only to those petitions filed after that executive order is reissued.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has concluded the annual H-1B cap lottery for Fiscal Year 2027, with employers and legal representatives now able to check selection outcomes through their registration portals.
In 1948, the world came together to declare that certain rights are inherent to every human being, regardless of nationality. Chief among these is the right to safety.
The Universal Right to Seek Safety
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), specifically Article 14, guarantees that "everyone has the right to
