¿Qué es el permiso “Parole in Place”?
Denice Flores • October 6, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
El Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de EE.UU. (USCIS) puede conceder el permiso “Parole in Place” a las familias de militares. Esto es lo que debe saber sobre este permiso.
Los EE.UU. pueden conceder el permiso “Parole in Place” en el lugar por razones humanitarias urgentes o de beneficio público significativo. INA 212(d)(5)(A).
El permiso “Parole in Place” se creó para beneficiar a las familias de militares con familiares indocumentados en Estados Unidos. La libertad condicional está destinada a los miembros del servicio militar o a su cónyuge, viuda, padre o madre, hijo o hija. El miembro del servicio debe ser un miembro en servicio activo de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU., en la reserva seleccionada de la reserva lista, o el miembro del servicio (vivo o fallecido) debe haber servido previamente en servicio activo o en la reserva seleccionada de la reserva lista y debe haber sido dado de baja con honores.
Un factor muy importante a tener en cuenta a la hora de determinar si el individuo reúne o no los requisitos para el permiso “Parole in Place”, es que el individuo debe estar presente en Estados Unidos sin haber sido admitido en el país.
Esto significa que el individuo debe haber entrado ilegalmente en Estados Unidos. Si, por ejemplo, el individuo fue admitido en Estados Unidos con un visado pero el visado y el estatus legal caducaron más tarde, y el individuo sigue en Estados Unidos, el individuo no reúne los requisitos para el permiso “Parole in Place” porque entró legalmente y fue admitido en Estados Unidos.
Si la persona es elegible sobre la base de los requisitos anteriores, las siguientes pruebas documentales deben ser presentadas a USCIS, con la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”:
- Pruebas de la relación familiar, tales como: certificado de matrimonio, documentación de la terminación de un matrimonio anterior, certificado de nacimiento del hijo o hija, certificado de nacimiento del miembro actual o antiguo del servicio con el nombre de los padres; o prueba de inscripción en el Sistema de Informes de Elegibilidad de Inscripción de la Defensa (DEERS);
- Prueba de que el familiar es miembro actual o antiguo de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU;
- Los padres de miembros actuales y antiguos de las fuerzas armadas de EE.UU. deben aportar pruebas de que el miembro actual o antiguo del servicio apoya la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”;
- Pruebas de cualquier factor discrecional favorable adicional que el individuo desee que USCIS considere. La evidencia debe mostrar USCIS la razón humanitaria urgente para la solicitud o el beneficio público significativo de la concesión del permiso “Parole in Place”, y
- Dos fotografías idénticas, tipo pasaporte en color, de la persona que solicita el permiso “Parole in Place”.
Si USCIS aprueba la solicitud del permiso “Parole in Place”, la persona queda protegida de la deportación y también puede optar a la autorización de empleo. La aprobación del permiso “Parole in Place” autoriza a la persona a permanecer en EE.UU. durante un año. La persona recibe un documento I-94 como prueba de la libertad condicional y el I-94 es prueba de una entrada legal a efectos de otros posibles alivios de inmigración.
Tenga en cuenta que el permiso “Parole in Place” no es lo mismo que la acción diferida. La acción diferida tiene diferentes requisitos de elegibilidad. Si usted está buscando hablar con un abogado acerca de la acción diferida, nuestra Firma también le puede ayudar.
Si usted tiene alguna pregunta acerca del permiso “Parole in Place” y otras formas potenciales de exención después de que se le haya otorgado el permiso “Parole in Place”, como el ajuste de estatus, por favor programe una consulta con uno de nuestros abogados expertos y estaremos más que encantados de ayudarle.
Este blog no pretende ser asesoramiento jurídico y nada de lo aquí expuesto debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Por favor, programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información leída aquí.
This Facebook widget is no longer supported.
Denice Flores
Similar Posts
On August 26, 2024 , the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, in Texas v. Department of Homeland Security , Case Number 24-cv-306 administratively stayed the Department of Homeland Security from granting parole in place under Keeping Families Together for 14 days. In Texas v. DHS , the State of Texas and several other plaintiffs argue that the DHS has implemented policies that they believe violate federal immigration laws. Specifically, they claim that DHS's guidelines on immigration enforcement and deportation procedures are too lenient and do not align with statutory requirements. The plaintiffs argue that these policies undermine state sovereignty and contribute to increased illegal immigration, which they believe has negative repercussions for public safety and resources. During the 14 days, USCIS will not grant any pending parole in place application under Keeping Families Together ; USCIS will continue to accept applications for parole in place for certain noncitizen spouses and stepchildren of U.S. Citizens, and will continue to schedule biometric appointments and capture biometrics for applicants. Note, that the district court’s administrative stay order does not affect any applications that were approved before the administrative stay order was issued on August 26, 2024. As of now, the program is on hold for 14 days, but that hold could be extended while the court considers arguments in the case. If you have any questions or concerns, contact our office to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced immigration attorneys.
On June 18, 2024, President Biden announced a series of immigration actions using the authority granted to him by our existing immigration laws. These actions will help certain undocumented individuals in the United States, including: Spouses and children of U.S. citizens who have been living in the United States for at least 10 years. You may be eligible to apply for your green card without leaving the United States, if, as of June 17, 2024: ○ You are in the United States after entering without permission; ○ You have lived in the United States for at least 10 years and have never left; ○ You are legally married to a U.S. citizen or have a qualifying stepchild relationship with a U.S. citizen; and ○ You do not have certain criminal history or pose a threat to national security or public safety. If you meet these criteria, the government MAY grant you parole-in-place. Parole would be granted for a one-time period of three years. You may also be eligible for employment authorization for up to three years. If you are granted parole y ou may apply for your green card within three years of approval. Eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. College-educated DACA recipients and Dreamers who are qualified for nonimmigrant status, such as an H-1B specialty occupation visa. You may be eligible to apply for a temporary visa more easily, if: ○ You have a degree from an accredited U.S. institution of higher education; and ○ You have an offer of employment from a U.S. employer in a field related to your degree. Please note that these programs have NOT YET begun. Details on how to apply are expected to be released by the end of the summer through a Federal Register notice. This means: You cannot submit an application at this time. An early-filed application will be rejected . You should not pay anyone a fee associated with filing an application at this time. Be patient and take the time to find the right help. The wrong advice could harm your chances of staying in the United States, getting lawful status, or becoming a U.S. citizen. Don't be fooled by notarios and other consultants who promise immediate results or special solutions in order to steal your money. Many unscrupulous individuals will cost more than licensed attorneys! If you are unsure if someone is qualified to help, ask for proof of their credentials and retain a copy of that evidence. This program could also be legally challenged, which could impact its implementation. This makes it even more important to have a qualified, knowledgeable attorney. USE AILA’s Find an Immigration Lawyer Search, ailalawyer.org , to find a licensed immigration attorney in good standing. Or find an accredited representative at: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/find-legal-representation . FONT: https://www.aila.org/library/information-and-guidance-on-new-actions-to-promote-family-unity
Navigating the U.S. immigration system is already a complex process, but a critical new federal court ruling has provided major relief to thousands of applicants who have found themselves caught in a challenging standstill. On Friday, June 5, 2026, U.S. District Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island issued a nationwide order declaring unlawful and vacating four restrictive U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policies. These internal policies had previously directed adjudicators to completely suspend processing and final decisions for immigration benefits filed on behalf of foreign nationals from roughly 39 countries. In a sharply worded ruling, Chief Judge McConnell criticized the administration’s restrictive processing directives, stating that the policies "threw the lives of countless immigrants living in the United States into indeterminate legal limbo." He further accused USCIS of actively ignoring established federal law by categorically barring these applicants from receiving final decisions. Which Countries and Benefits Are Affected? The 39 affected nations are located predominantly across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East, heavily mirroring countries that have been targets of broader administration travel bans. Under the struck-down policies, individuals from these specific countries faced indefinite halts on their essential filings, regardless of the individual merits of their cases. The federal court's decision directly impacts a wide spectrum of vital immigration pathways, including: Asylum Applications Employment Authorization Documents (Work Permits) Adjustment of Status (Green Cards) Naturalization (Citizenship Applications) What This Means For Clients and Applicants The core takeaway of this decision is immediate: USCIS must resume processing these cases. Because the court's ruling carries a nationwide effect, the agency is no longer permitted to pause or shelve a file simply because of the applicant’s country of origin. While the administration is widely expected to appeal Chief Judge McConnell's decision, the policy is officially vacated for the time being. For individuals from the affected nations who have watched their applications sit frozen for months without explanation, this opens a crucial window to see their cases move forward toward a final determination. How Santos Lloyd Law Firm Can Assist The landscape of U.S. immigration remains incredibly fluid, and shifts in federal policy can radically impact your status, career, or timeline. If you are a national of one of the affected countries or have an application that has been experiencing unusual or prolonged delays, it is critical to evaluate how this new ruling alters your strategy. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., we closely monitor federal litigation and shifting agency guidance to provide our clients with proactive legal support. Whether you are navigating family-based applications, employment visas, or citizenship tracks, our experienced attorneys are here to help you understand your options and build a viable path forward.
Starting July 10, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is implementing a strict new rule regarding signatures on immigration benefit requests. Taking this change seriously is crucial, as the consequences for submitting an invalid signature are severe and costly. Under the new rule, USCIS officers have the authority to deny your filing if they discover an invalid signature during the adjudication process, even if your application was already accepted and you were issued a receipt notice. If your case is denied for a signature defect, USCIS will not allow you to fix or "cure" the mistake. You will be forced to submit an entirely new petition and pay a new filing fee, which could result in missed deadlines, delayed work authorization, or even the loss of your legal status. USCIS officers may use imaging tools during adjudication to closely compare signatures across your previous filings to detect inconsistencies or copy-and-pasted images of signatures. Under the new rules, USCIS strictly considers several types of signatures to be invalid, including software-generated or digital signatures, such as those created by DocuSign, as well as copy-and-pasted or inserted images of signatures reused across multiple forms. Furthermore, stamped or typewritten names are prohibited, along with any signatures executed by anyone other than the authorized requestor, such as an attorney, interpreter, or preparer. Because USCIS now has expanded authority to outright deny cases and keep filing fees over signature defects, it is highly recommended that you adopt a practice of using wet-ink signatures for not just USCIS forms, but all documents submitted in your petition such as recommendation letters or personal statements. Thus, any upcoming petition you are filing with USCIS must include original, handwritten, “wet-ink” signatures. While USCIS does allow you to submit a scanned, photocopied, or faxed version of your application, the copy you upload or mail must be of a document that was physically signed in wet ink. Audit your signature practices before the July 10, 2026, implementation date to protect your filing fees and ensure your immigration case stays safely on track.
Navigating U.S. immigration law can often feel like learning a completely new language. Two terms that frequently confuse are lawful status and a period of authorized stay. While they sound similar and both relate to your ability to remain in the United States, they are distinct legal concepts. Understanding the difference is critical. Mixing them up can accidentally lead to visa violations, unlawful presence, and severe long-term immigration consequences. 1. What is Lawful Status? Lawful status means you have been officially granted the right to be in the United States by the U.S. government, and that right is currently active. You hold a lawful status if you are: A U.S. citizen or national. A Lawful Permanent Resident (Green Card holder) or Conditional Permanent Resident. A nonimmigrant who was lawfully admitted to the country for a temporary period (such as on a tourist, student, or work visa). For temporary visa holders, your lawful status is directly tied to your Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record). As long as the date on your I-94 has not passed, and you are actively following the rules of your visa - such as maintaining a full course load on an F-1 student visa or working only for your approved sponsor on an H-1B visa - you are in lawful status. 2. What is a Period of Authorized Stay? A period of authorized stay is essentially a temporary legal buffer. It means the government allows you to physically remain in the country for the time being, but you do not hold an active, lawful status. The most common way to enter this buffer zone is by filing to extend, change, or adjust your visa status before your current permission expires. While you wait for USCIS to make a decision, your Form I-94 expiration date will often pass. At that exact moment, your active lawful status officially ends. However, because you submitted your application on time, you automatically enter a period of authorized stay for as long as your case remains pending. It is important to note that, while this authorized stay stops you from accruing unlawful presence (the dangerous clock that triggers multi-year reentry bars), it does not grant you a formal legal status, nor does it completely shield you from the initiation of removal (deportation) proceedings. It functions as a temporary stay, not a permanent safety net. If USCIS denies your application and your original visa has already expired, your temporary buffer zone vanishes instantly. The consequences are immediate and serious: since you no longer hold a valid status or a pending case, you no longer have legal permission to be in the country, giving the government the right to start removal proceedings. To avoid these highly stressful risks, the safest strategy is to maintain a valid underlying status when possible. If you are currently waiting on a pending application or have questions about your options, our office is here to help you navigate the system safely. Reach out to us today to schedule a consultation.
