Refus de l'USCIS - Pouvez-vous faire appel ou déposer une requête après que l'USCIS a refusé votre dossier ?
Denice Flores • October 6, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Les services de citoyenneté et d'immigration des États-Unis (USCIS) ont-ils rejeté votre demande ? Vous avez peut-être encore la possibilité de faire appel de la décision ou de déposer une requête dans votre dossier.
Remarque : ces informations ne s'appliquent pas aux dossiers rejetés par un juge de l'immigration devant le tribunal de l'immigration. Elles ne concernent que les dossiers déposés auprès de l'USCIS.
Vous pouvez faire appel de la décision de l'USCIS ou demander à l'USCIS de réexaminer le refus en remplissant le formulaire I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion. Un appel est déposé auprès de l'Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) ou commission administrative d'appel. Une motion est déposée auprès du bureau de l'USCIS qui a rendu la dernière décision dans votre cas. Il peut s'agir d'un bureau local, d'un centre de services ou de l'AAO.
Veuillez noter que seul le demandeur ou le pétitionnaire de l'affaire peut déposer le formulaire I-290B. Le bénéficiaire de la requête ou tout avocat du bénéficiaire ne peut pas déposer d'appel ou de requête.
Dans la plupart des cas, conformément au titre 8, C.F.R. §103.5(a)(1)(i), un appel ou une requête doit être déposé dans les 30 jours calendaires suivant la date de la décision de l'USCIS. Toutefois, si l'USCIS a envoyé la décision par courrier, c'est la date d'envoi de la décision qui est prise en compte pour le décompte des 30 jours. L'USCIS peut refuser un appel ou une requête déposée tardivement. Veuillez noter que si vous déposez une motion de réouverture après les 30 jours, l'USCIS peut encore accepter la motion si elle détermine que le retard était raisonnable et indépendant de votre volonté.
Lorsque vous remplissez le formulaire I-290B, vous devez inclure toutes les preuves et tous les documents à l'appui de votre appel ou de votre requête. Si vous déposez une requête, vous pouvez inclure un mémoire juridique et si vous déposez une requête en réouverture après les 30 jours de la décision, vous pouvez inclure des preuves montrant que le retard était raisonnable et indépendant de votre volonté.
Autre point important, n'oubliez pas d'inclure la taxe de dépôt de 675 dollars lorsque vous soumettez le formulaire I-290B à l'USCIS. Si vous ne payez pas le montant exact, l'USCIS rejettera votre appel ou votre requête.
De plus, l'adresse à laquelle vous déposez le formulaire I-290B dépend du type de demande que l'USCIS a rejetée et pour laquelle vous faites appel ou déposez une requête. Vous pouvez consulter le site web de l'USCIS (https://www.uscis.gov/i-290b-addresses) pour déterminer l'adresse appropriée à votre cas.
Si vous avez des questions sur le type de preuves à inclure, sur l'endroit où déposer votre appel ou votre requête, ou si vous vous demandez si vous pouvez faire appel ou déposer une requête dans votre affaire, prenez immédiatement rendez-vous avec l'un de nos avocats expérimentés et nous nous ferons un plaisir de vous aider.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
