Refus de l'USCIS - Pouvez-vous faire appel ou déposer une requête après que l'USCIS a refusé votre dossier ?
Denice Flores • October 6, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Les services de citoyenneté et d'immigration des États-Unis (USCIS) ont-ils rejeté votre demande ? Vous avez peut-être encore la possibilité de faire appel de la décision ou de déposer une requête dans votre dossier.
Remarque : ces informations ne s'appliquent pas aux dossiers rejetés par un juge de l'immigration devant le tribunal de l'immigration. Elles ne concernent que les dossiers déposés auprès de l'USCIS.
Vous pouvez faire appel de la décision de l'USCIS ou demander à l'USCIS de réexaminer le refus en remplissant le formulaire I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion. Un appel est déposé auprès de l'Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) ou commission administrative d'appel. Une motion est déposée auprès du bureau de l'USCIS qui a rendu la dernière décision dans votre cas. Il peut s'agir d'un bureau local, d'un centre de services ou de l'AAO.
Veuillez noter que seul le demandeur ou le pétitionnaire de l'affaire peut déposer le formulaire I-290B. Le bénéficiaire de la requête ou tout avocat du bénéficiaire ne peut pas déposer d'appel ou de requête.
Dans la plupart des cas, conformément au titre 8, C.F.R. §103.5(a)(1)(i), un appel ou une requête doit être déposé dans les 30 jours calendaires suivant la date de la décision de l'USCIS. Toutefois, si l'USCIS a envoyé la décision par courrier, c'est la date d'envoi de la décision qui est prise en compte pour le décompte des 30 jours. L'USCIS peut refuser un appel ou une requête déposée tardivement. Veuillez noter que si vous déposez une motion de réouverture après les 30 jours, l'USCIS peut encore accepter la motion si elle détermine que le retard était raisonnable et indépendant de votre volonté.
Lorsque vous remplissez le formulaire I-290B, vous devez inclure toutes les preuves et tous les documents à l'appui de votre appel ou de votre requête. Si vous déposez une requête, vous pouvez inclure un mémoire juridique et si vous déposez une requête en réouverture après les 30 jours de la décision, vous pouvez inclure des preuves montrant que le retard était raisonnable et indépendant de votre volonté.
Autre point important, n'oubliez pas d'inclure la taxe de dépôt de 675 dollars lorsque vous soumettez le formulaire I-290B à l'USCIS. Si vous ne payez pas le montant exact, l'USCIS rejettera votre appel ou votre requête.
De plus, l'adresse à laquelle vous déposez le formulaire I-290B dépend du type de demande que l'USCIS a rejetée et pour laquelle vous faites appel ou déposez une requête. Vous pouvez consulter le site web de l'USCIS (https://www.uscis.gov/i-290b-addresses) pour déterminer l'adresse appropriée à votre cas.
Si vous avez des questions sur le type de preuves à inclure, sur l'endroit où déposer votre appel ou votre requête, ou si vous vous demandez si vous pouvez faire appel ou déposer une requête dans votre affaire, prenez immédiatement rendez-vous avec l'un de nos avocats expérimentés et nous nous ferons un plaisir de vous aider.
Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.

In 1948, the world came together to declare that certain rights are inherent to every human being, regardless of nationality. Chief among these is the right to safety.
The Universal Right to Seek Safety
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), specifically Article 14, guarantees that "everyone has the right to


