¿Qué es una carta de consulta para visas O?
April Perez • May 4, 2023
Click here to read this article in English
Al solicitar una visa O-1, USCIS requiere que se proporcione una opinión consultiva escrita de un grupo de colegas (que incluya organizaciones laborales) o de una persona con experiencia en el área de habilidad del beneficiario como parte de la solicitud.
USCIS proporciona una lista de organizaciones que pueden emitir una carta basada en el título laboral de la persona.Puede consultar dicha lista aquí: https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary-workers/address-index-for-i-129-o-and-p-consultation-letters
En algunos casos, puede que no esté claro qué organizaciones de la lista pueden emitir la carta para un título laboral específico. En ese escenario, se puede necesitar contactar a varias organizaciones para preguntar si pueden emitir una carta para un trabajo específico.
Si la visa O-1 es para una persona con logros extraordinarios en el cine o la televisión, deberá obtener una carta de consulta del sindicato que cubra su título laboral o campo y una segunda carta de una organización de gestión con experiencia en el área de habilidad del beneficiario. La organización de gestión suele ser la Alianza de Productores de Cine y Televisión (AMPTP).
Cada organización tiene sus propios requisitos para las pruebas que deben presentarse para su revisión con el fin de determinar si pueden emitir una carta de apoyo, su propia tarifa, requisitos sobre cómo se debe presentar la tarifa y su propia línea de tiempo para la revisión y emisión de la carta.
En algunos casos, si ninguna organización laboral en la lista cubre el área de experiencia del solicitante, como es el caso de los entrenadores de fútbol, el solicitante aún puede obtener una carta de una organización o persona que no esté en la lista y que pueda revisar los materiales del solicitante y emitir una carta en la que explique el nivel de logros y experiencia del solicitante.
Si no existe una organización laboral o de colegas para el campo del solicitante, entonces la petición deberá incluir evidencia e información que demuestre que no existe un grupo de pares o una organización laboral, y USCIS deberá emitir su decisión basándose en la evidencia proporcionada.
Esta es solo una parte del proceso de solicitud de la visa O, pero es un requisito importante para la decisión de USCIS.
Si cree que puede calificar para una visa no inmigrante O, puede comunicarse con nuestra oficina.
Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada de lo aquí expuesto debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Por favor, programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar basado en cualquier información leída aquí.
Similar Posts
If you are planning on filing an O1B visa based on your extraordinary ability, you may need to provide some reference letters as part of the evidence for your application.
You can use letters for various requirements. One specific requirement for the O1B that you will definitely need letters for is the requirement: Evidence the beneficiary has received significant recognition for achievements from organizations, critics, government agencies, or other recognized experts in the field in which the alien is engaged. Such testimonials must be in a form which clearly indicates the author’s authority, expertise, and knowledge of the alien’s achievement. The letters should come from individuals who work within the same field and explain their own background and accomplishments within that field. The individual should also be familiar with the applicant’s work and be able to attest to that person’s accomplishments within the specified field. Letters from individuals without experience within the same field as the a
When applying for an O-1 visa USCIS requires that a written advisory opinion from a peer group (including labor organizations) or a person with expertise in the beneficiary’s area of ability be provided as part of the application.
If you’ve ever dreamed of bringing your culinary artistry to the United States —whether as a chef in a high-end kitchen, a pastry artisan designing edible masterpieces, or a baker introducing centuries-old family recipes to American diners—there may be a visa that fits you as well as your favorite apron. In the vibrant world of U.S. immigration, two options shine particularly bright for culinary professionals: the O-1B and the P-3 visa. While many assume these are only for Hollywood stars or folk musicians, the reality is that they’ve opened doors for creative professionals across fields—including those whose medium is flavor. Let’s start with the O-1B visa . This visa is for individuals with “extraordinary ability” in the arts, which USCIS defines as someone who has achieved distinction through national or international acclaim. Think of it as a spotlight on your achievements—whether you’ve been featured in culinary magazines, headlined food festivals, worked in renowned kitchens, or garnered praise from respected critics and chefs. You don’t need a Michelin star (though it doesn’t hurt)—you just need to prove that your skill and reputation put you in a class above the rest. With this visa, you can work in the U.S. for up to three years, with the possibility of extensions if you're still cooking up success. Now, if your passion lies in preserving and sharing your cultural heritage through cuisine, the P-3 visa may be the better fit. Designed for artists and entertainers coming to the U.S. to perform, teach, or coach as part of a “culturally unique” program, the P-3 visa is perfect for chefs trained in traditional methods who want to introduce authentic ethnic flavors to American tables. For example, a Japanese sushi master teaching regional techniques at culinary schools, a French chef recreating the rustic dishes of Provence in a farm-to-table restaurant in California, or an Italian baker bringing regional specialties like Sicilian cassata or Roman maritozzi to a bakery in Brooklyn. According to USCIS, the program must aim to “further the understanding or development of your art form,” and can be commercial or noncommercial in nature. The visa lasts for one year, with extensions available. So why are these options such a win for culinary professionals? For one, they bypass the long timelines and complexities of labor certification. They’re faster, more affordable, and allow your talent—or your tradition—to speak for itself. In an era where Americans are increasingly craving authentic global flavors, having a native expert in the kitchen isn’t just a trend—it’s an experience. And the U.S. immigration system is catching on. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we’ve helped countless culinary professionals find the right visa to match their dreams. Whether your story is written in saffron and smoke or flour and sugar, we’re here to help you bring it to life in the United States. Ready to take your career stateside? Contact us to get started—because your next chapter may be just one visa away.
In recent months, the U.S. government has intensified its vetting procedures for individuals seeking entry into the United States, whether through visa applications abroad or inspection at ports of entry. This shift, prioritized by the current administration, is having a noticeable impact on immigrants, visa holders, and even lawful permanent residents (LPRs). At U.S. consulates worldwide, applicants are experiencing increased delays , often being placed into administrative processing under Section 221(g) or referred for Security Advisory Opinions (SAOs) , which can significantly prolong visa issuance. Officers are now engaging in deeper reviews of applicants' backgrounds, including their t ravel histories, social media accounts, and foreign ties . This scrutiny applies to a wide range of visa categories, from visitor visas to employment-based petitions. Importantly, officers are exercising broader discretion when deciding who qualifies for a visa, making the process more unpredictable, even for applicants with strong cases. This enhanced vetting does not end at the consulate. Individuals entering the U.S. — even those with valid visas or green cards — are increasingly subject to prolonged secondary inspections by Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Officers may ask detailed questions about prior immigration history, travel patterns, and social media activity. In some cases, travelers are asked to provide access to their electronic devices for further inspection. There are also growing reports of travelers being referred to deferred inspection or even issued a Notice to Appear (NTA) for removal proceedings, despite previously lawful entries. While some of these practices have existed in the past, the current administration has formalized and expanded them. Experts warn that additional travel restrictions or targeted bans could also emerge as part of the administration’s enforcement priorities. For employment-based applicants, these delays and complications can severely impact U.S. businesses and foreign nationals who contribute critical skills to the U.S. economy. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared before attending a visa interview or traveling internationally. Understanding your rights and preparing thoroughly can help you navigate this uncertain landscape. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. , our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, supported, and protected. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
On March 31, 2024, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) implemented a policy update that limits gender marker selections on all immigration forms and systems to two biological sexes: male and female. This change eliminates the option for applicants to select a non-binary or “X” gender marker—an option that had previously been permitted on some forms. While USCIS emphasizes that this update does not change who qualifies for immigration benefits, it may significantly impact how certain applications—particularly asylum claims based on gender identity-related persecution—are understood and evaluated. What Has Changed? Under the revised policy, applicants may now only choose “Male” or “Female” when completing USCIS forms. The ability to select a non-binary or third-gender option is no longer available. Applicants may still request to change their gender marker with USCIS, but only within the male/female binary. Supporting documentation, such as medical or legal records, is not required to make the change. This means that transgender individuals can still align their gender marker with their identity—if it falls within the two binary categories—but non-binary individuals are no longer represented. The change follows guidance issued by the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which called for greater consistency in the collection of sex and gender data across federal agencies. Impact on Asylum Applicants This policy update is especially important for individuals applying for asylum based on persecution related to their gender identity. Under U.S. immigration law, asylum is available to people who have suffered persecution—or fear future persecution—based on their membership in a “particular social group.” This includes people targeted for being transgender, gender non-conforming, or otherwise not aligning with socially expected gender roles in their home country. Although the legal standard for asylum remains unchanged, the removal of the non-binary gender marker could make it harder for some applicants to clearly present and document their identity. In asylum cases, credibility and clarity are crucial. The ability to accurately reflect one’s gender identity on official forms can play an important role in establishing the foundation of a persecution claim. Now, applicants who identify as non-binary or outside the traditional male/female categories may be forced to select a gender that does not align with their lived experience. This could lead to confusion in their case file or require additional explanation during interviews or hearings. This policy could weaken the strength of some asylum claims—not because the underlying facts have changed, but because the official forms now fail to reflect the applicant’s true identity. For example: A non-binary person applying for asylum after being targeted in their home country may now have to select “Male” or “Female” on their asylum application, despite not identifying as either. This mismatch may lead adjudicators to question the applicant’s identity, possibly weakening the strength of the claim or requiring added clarification and documentation. In defensive asylum cases—where applicants are in removal proceedings—such inconsistencies could create unnecessary hurdles and complicate the evidentiary presentation. What Can Applicants Do? Despite the change, individuals can still pursue asylum based on gender identity. The underlying eligibility criteria remain the same. However, applicants should be prepared to clearly explain any differences between their stated identity and the gender marker required on USCIS forms. Applicants are encouraged to: Include a personal declaration explaining their gender identity in detail and how it relates to their fear of persecution. Provide evidence such as affidavits, country condition reports, or expert testimony that supports the claim. Work with an experienced immigration attorney who can help present the claim effectively and prepare for any questions that might arise from the new form limitations. The new USCIS policy on gender markers may seem like a technical update, but for asylum seekers fleeing gender-based persecution, it has real implications. While individuals are still legally eligible to seek protection, the limitation to binary gender options could make it more difficult to fully and clearly present their case. If you or someone you know is facing immigration challenges related to gender identity—or is concerned about how this policy may impact an asylum claim—please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced immigration attorneys. We’re here to help ensure your voice is heard and your case is handled with the care and expertise it deserves.
