The 2026 Visa Freeze: Which Countries Are Affected and What Applicants Should Do Now
Josephine Franz • May 22, 2026
In the span of about five weeks, U.S. visa policy changed in ways that affect close to 100 countries. A Presidential Proclamation issued on December 16, 2025, expanded an earlier travel ban to cover 39 countries effective January 1, 2026. Two weeks later, the Department of State announced a separate administrative pause on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries, effective January 21, 2026. The two policies overlap in places, diverge in others, and together create one of the broadest restrictions on U.S. visa issuance in recent memory.
For applicants and employers trying to make sense of the news, the most important point is this: the rules differ depending on (a) which country the applicant is from, (b) which visa category they are seeking, and (c) where they were on January 1, 2026. Below is a practical guide to what is in place, what is still available, and what to do next.
Two Distinct Policies, One Confused Headline
What the press has often called "the visa freeze" is actually two separate policies, with different legal foundations and different scopes.
Presidential Proclamation 10998 the 39-country travel ban. Signed December 16, 2025, and effective January 1, 2026, this proclamation supersedes and expands the June 2025 travel ban. It invokes INA §§ 212(f) and 215(a) the same legal authority that the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. Hawaii (2018) — and divides affected countries into two tiers.
The State Department's 75-country immigrant visa pause. Announced on January 14, 2026, and effective January 21, 2026, this is an internal Department of State policy, not a presidential proclamation. It freezes immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries on a stated rationale of public charge concerns. It has been challenged in court (CLINIC v. U.S. Department of State, S.D.N.Y., filed February 2, 2026) on grounds including the INA's prohibition on nationality-based discrimination in immigrant visa issuance.
Because the policies operate independently, an applicant from a country that appears on both lists faces overlapping restrictions, while an applicant from a country on only one list faces a narrower set.
Tier 1: Full Suspension Under Proclamation 10998 (19 Countries)
Nationals of these 19 countries are subject to a full suspension of both immigrant and nonimmigrant visa issuance: Afghanistan, Burma, Burkina Faso, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Niger, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The proclamation also applies to individuals traveling on documents issued or endorsed by the Palestinian Authority.
For applicants in this tier, no tourist, student, work, or immigrant visas will generally be issued, subject to a narrow set of exceptions discussed below.
Tier 2: Partial Suspension Under Proclamation 10998 (19 Countries + Turkmenistan)
Nationals of these 19 countries are subject to a partial suspension: Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Gabon, The Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Togo, Tonga, Venezuela, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
For these countries, the proclamation suspends:
- All immigrant visas, and
- B-1/B-2 visitor visas, F and M student visas, and J exchange visitor visas.
Critically, employment-based and other nonimmigrant categories including H, L, O, P, and R visas remain available to nationals of these countries, although consular officers are directed to reduce the validity period of any such visa to the minimum extent permitted by law. For our firm's many clients in the entertainment, sports, and business immigration space, this distinction is often the difference between a paused career and a viable plan.
Turkmenistan occupies a unique position: under the December proclamation, only immigrant visa issuance is suspended; nonimmigrant categories remain available.
The Separate State Department Pause (75 Countries)
The January 21, 2026 State Department policy paused issuance of immigrant visas only to nationals of 75 countries. The list is broader than the Proclamation 10998 list and notably includes countries with significant client populations for our firm, such as Brazil, Colombia, Egypt, Guatemala, Lebanon, Morocco, Nicaragua, Pakistan, and many others.
Two practical points are essential:
- The pause is limited to immigrant visas. Nonimmigrant visas including B-1/B-2, F-1, J-1, H, L, O, P, and R are not affected by this policy. A Brazilian artist seeking an O-1, a Colombian executive seeking an L-1, or a Lebanese professional seeking an H-1B can generally continue to apply.
- The policy is being challenged in court. Plaintiffs in CLINIC v. State Department argue that the freeze violates INA § 1152's prohibition on nationality-based discrimination in immigrant visa issuance, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Fifth Amendment. The outcome is not predictable, and applicants should not delay strategic planning while awaiting a ruling.
Who Is Exempt or Otherwise Unaffected
Several categories of individuals are not covered by Proclamation 10998, even where their country of nationality appears on the list:
- Lawful permanent residents of the United States. Green card holders may continue to travel and re-enter, though re-entry can still involve closer secondary inspection.
- Individuals physically present in the United States on January 1, 2026. The proclamation applies only to those who were outside the U.S. and without a valid visa as of the effective date.
- Holders of valid visas issued before January 1, 2026. No visa issued before the effective date has been or will be revoked under the proclamation. These visas may continue to be used for travel.
- Dual nationals who can apply on the passport of a country not subject to the suspension.
- A, G, and NATO visa holders, certain Special Immigrant Visa applicants, and limited national interest exceptions, including for specific adoption-related cases.
It is worth emphasizing that exemption from the entry ban is not the same as exemption from related USCIS processing holds. Some lawful permanent residents from affected countries have nonetheless experienced delays on naturalization (N-400) and family petition (I-130) processing under separate administrative directives.
What Applicants Should Do Now
Given how rapidly the rules are changing and how case-specific the consequences are, we are advising clients to take the following steps:
- Identify which list (or lists) applies to you. A national of Iran or Syria faces fundamentally different exposure than a national of Brazil or Colombia, even though both may have heard "visa freeze" in the news.
- Look at categories, not just countries. For Tier 2 countries and the 75-country pause, employment-based nonimmigrant categories remain a viable path. Many of the O-1, P-1, H-1B, L-1, and EB-1A pathways our firm regularly handles are unaffected by the immigrant-visa freeze.
- Consider where you are physically located. Applicants currently in the United States have planning options that applicants abroad may not. Departing the country at the wrong moment can convert an inconvenience into a years-long problem.
- Do not assume current valid visas remain a guarantee of admission. While valid visas are not being revoked, port-of-entry scrutiny has increased, and discretionary admission decisions are ultimately made by Customs and Border Protection.
- Seek counsel before international travel if you are from any affected country, hold any form of conditional or pending status, or have any concerns about prior immigration history.
When to Consult an Attorney
The combination of the Proclamation 10998 travel ban, the 75-country immigrant visa pause, ongoing litigation, and the additional USCIS holds on certain benefit applications has produced a landscape where the right answer is rarely obvious from the news alone. Speaking with counsel is especially important when:
- Your country appears on either list, and you have a pending or planned visa application.
- You are weighing whether to leave the United States for a consular interview.
- You are an employer with a foreign national workforce and need to understand which categories remain viable.
- You are a dual national considering which passport to use.
- You hold a valid visa from before January 1, 2026, and are uncertain whether to travel.
At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we represent clients from across the affected country lists including substantial numbers in entertainment, sports, business, and family immigration and we are actively monitoring both the litigation and the State Department's evolving guidance. If you have questions about how the current restrictions apply to your case or your company, our attorneys are available to help you build a plan.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
Josephine Franz
Similar Posts
Holding a U.S. visa does not guarantee permanent entry. The Department of State can cancel a visa after it is issued through a process called “prudential visa revocation.” These revocations have surged throughout 2025 and 2026. This increase is a direct result of enhanced vetting and increased data sharing between government agencies. Through the Continuous Vetting Center, law enforcement and immigration databases are now cross-referenced in real time, allowing officials to flag and revoke visas the moment new information surfaces or updated information is received, such as a past criminal arrest or a security alert. What is Prudential Visa Revocation? A prudential revocation is a precautionary cancellation. It happens when new information suggests a traveler might be ineligible for a visa or could pose a safety concern. A revocation cancels your visa, but it does not automatically end your status if you are already inside the U.S. and following the rules of your stay. Common triggers include: Criminal Arrests (DUI/DWI): Even a previous incident or single arrest without a conviction can trigger an immediate revocation. Security Alerts: New hits on watchlists or intelligence databases. Loss of Eligibility: Such as losing a job or failing to maintain student status. Fraud: Discovery of errors or lies on previous applications. The DOS usually notifies individuals via the email address listed on their DS-160 application. However, many travelers reportedly only discover the revocation when they are denied boarding at the airport. If your visa is revoked while you are in the U.S., you can typically remain in the country until the date on your Form I-94 expires, provided you continue to follow all terms of your stay. However, you should avoid international travel until you consult with legal counsel, as leaving the U.S. will require you to apply for a brand-new visa to re-enter. This application process may involve extra scrutiny, such as medical evaluations or supplemental documentation - especially if the revocation was triggered by a DUI or DWI. If your visa has been revoked and you need to discuss your legal options, please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for guidance.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently updated its protocols regarding the screening and vetting of immigration benefit applications. These changes involve a more detailed review process that may impact processing times and evidence requirements for various categories of benefits. Key Changes to the Adjudication Process The updated guidance outlines several shifts in how USCIS processes and reviews applications: Adjustment of EAD Validity Periods: For certain categories, the validity periods of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) may be shortened. This can result in more frequent eligibility reviews throughout the application process. Expanded Use of Social Media and Financial Data: Adjudicators have been granted broader authority to review an applicant’s social media activity and financial history during the vetting process. Policy Updates on Biometric Verification: The agency is revising its approach to biometric identity verification, including the reuse of fingerprints and photographs. Country-Specific Scrutiny: USCIS is coordinating with the Department of State to apply specific analysis to applications based on regional risk factors and fraud indicators. Impact on Interviews and Processing Applicants for adjustment of status, naturalization, and other benefits may encounter more focused questioning during interviews. USCIS is now tailoring its interview process to address potential red flags associated with specific geographic regions or benefit categories. Because of this increased scrutiny, it is essential that all information provided in an application is consistent with an applicant's public record and digital footprint. Discrepancies or incomplete documentation can result in delays or additional requests for evidence. Next Steps As these procedures are implemented, applicants should ensure that all submitted materials are accurate and verifiable. We recommend a thorough review of all public information and documentation prior to filing. If you have questions regarding how these procedural changes may affect your specific case, our team is available to discuss the current requirements and help navigate the updated process.
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
When applying for a green card or seeking admission into the United States, one of the legal hurdles many applicants may face is the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This test evaluates whether someone is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support. But what exactly does that mean—and what types of public benefits can trigger this issue? In this article, we’ll break down what “public charge” really means, who is affected, what types of public benefits are considered, and what immigrants should be mindful of when making decisions about public programs like Medi-Cal and Medicaid. What Is the Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility? The public charge rule applies to individuals applying for a visa, green card (adjustment of status), or entry into the U.S., unless they fall into an exempt category. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must determine whether the applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. This typically refers to receiving: Public cash assistance for income maintenance (such as SSI or TANF), or Long-term institutional care at government expense. This determination is based on the "totality of circumstances," including age, health, financial resources, education, skills, and whether a sponsor has submitted a valid Affidavit of Support. Who Is Exempt from the Public Charge Rule? Many categories of immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. These include: Asylees and refugees Special immigrant juveniles Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners T and U visa applicants Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Importantly, even if someone later adjusts status through a different pathway that is subject to public charge, any benefits they received while in an exempt category will not be held against them. What Public Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Test? It is a common and harmful myth that using any public benefit will jeopardize your immigration status. In fact, most non-cash benefits do not count against you in a public charge determination. According to USCIS and DHS guidance, the following types of assistance (current as of July 1, 2025) are not considered: Health-Related Benefits Medi-Cal/Medicaid, except for long-term institutional care Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance through the ACA Marketplace, including subsidies COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment Community health services, crisis counseling, and short-term shelters Food and Nutrition SNAP (Food Stamps) WIC School meal programs Food banks and emergency food assistance Housing and Energy Emergency shelter Rental assistance (e.g., McKinney-Vento programs) Energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP) Education and Childcare Public schooling Head Start Childcare subsidies (e.g., CCDF) Educational grants and scholarships Federal Cash and Tax Benefits Earned income tax credit (EITC) Child Tax Credit (CTC) Stimulus checks Unemployment insurance Social Security and veteran’s benefits Disaster and pandemic-related cash aid In short, just because a benefit is public or government-funded doesn’t automatically make it count against you. A Word of Caution About Medi-Cal and Medicaid, in Particular As of today (07/01/2025), standard use of Medi-Cal (California’s version of Medicaid) or Medicaid for most health-related services is not considered in a public charge determination. This includes preventative care, emergency services, pregnancy-related services, and short-term care. However, if Medicaid is used for long-term institutionalization, such as in a nursing home or psychiatric facility, that does count under the public charge test. Despite current guidance, we are seeing political shifts and changes in tone from the current administration that suggest public charge policies may become more restrictive in the future. This includes renewed interest in expanding the types of public benefits that may be considered, particularly around medical assistance. For that reason, we generally recommend that individuals who are applying for adjustment of status, or who may be subject to the public charge ground in the future, avoid enrolling in Medi-Cal or Medicaid at this time, unless absolutely necessary. Final Thoughts Immigration law is complex, and the rules surrounding public charge can feel confusing or even frightening. But it’s important to understand that using most public benefits—especially for food, education, and healthcare—will not automatically jeopardize your green card or visa application. Still, because policy can change quickly, we urge individuals to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for any public assistance—especially healthcare programs like Medi-Cal or Medicaid. If you have questions or concerns about how public benefits might impact your immigration case, our office is here to help. We are committed to providing up-to-date, personalized guidance to keep your immigration journey on track. Disclaimer The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every immigration case is unique, and the application of the public charge rule may vary depending on your specific situation. If you believe this topic may apply to you or you need individualized legal guidance, we encourage you to contact one of our highly-qualified legal professionals for a consultation and assistance tailored to your circumstances. Resources: USCIS Public Charge Resources ILRC Medi-Cal and Public Charge Alert (2024) California Medi-Cal Immigrant Eligibility FAQ
Holding a U.S. visa does not guarantee permanent entry. The Department of State can cancel a visa after it is issued through a process called “prudential visa revocation.” These revocations have surged throughout 2025 and 2026. This increase is a direct result of enhanced vetting and increased data sharing between government agencies. Through the Continuous Vetting Center, law enforcement and immigration databases are now cross-referenced in real time, allowing officials to flag and revoke visas the moment new information surfaces or updated information is received, such as a past criminal arrest or a security alert. What is Prudential Visa Revocation? A prudential revocation is a precautionary cancellation. It happens when new information suggests a traveler might be ineligible for a visa or could pose a safety concern. A revocation cancels your visa, but it does not automatically end your status if you are already inside the U.S. and following the rules of your stay. Common triggers include: Criminal Arrests (DUI/DWI): Even a previous incident or single arrest without a conviction can trigger an immediate revocation. Security Alerts: New hits on watchlists or intelligence databases. Loss of Eligibility: Such as losing a job or failing to maintain student status. Fraud: Discovery of errors or lies on previous applications. The DOS usually notifies individuals via the email address listed on their DS-160 application. However, many travelers reportedly only discover the revocation when they are denied boarding at the airport. If your visa is revoked while you are in the U.S., you can typically remain in the country until the date on your Form I-94 expires, provided you continue to follow all terms of your stay. However, you should avoid international travel until you consult with legal counsel, as leaving the U.S. will require you to apply for a brand-new visa to re-enter. This application process may involve extra scrutiny, such as medical evaluations or supplemental documentation - especially if the revocation was triggered by a DUI or DWI. If your visa has been revoked and you need to discuss your legal options, please contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm for guidance.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has recently updated its protocols regarding the screening and vetting of immigration benefit applications. These changes involve a more detailed review process that may impact processing times and evidence requirements for various categories of benefits. Key Changes to the Adjudication Process The updated guidance outlines several shifts in how USCIS processes and reviews applications: Adjustment of EAD Validity Periods: For certain categories, the validity periods of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) may be shortened. This can result in more frequent eligibility reviews throughout the application process. Expanded Use of Social Media and Financial Data: Adjudicators have been granted broader authority to review an applicant’s social media activity and financial history during the vetting process. Policy Updates on Biometric Verification: The agency is revising its approach to biometric identity verification, including the reuse of fingerprints and photographs. Country-Specific Scrutiny: USCIS is coordinating with the Department of State to apply specific analysis to applications based on regional risk factors and fraud indicators. Impact on Interviews and Processing Applicants for adjustment of status, naturalization, and other benefits may encounter more focused questioning during interviews. USCIS is now tailoring its interview process to address potential red flags associated with specific geographic regions or benefit categories. Because of this increased scrutiny, it is essential that all information provided in an application is consistent with an applicant's public record and digital footprint. Discrepancies or incomplete documentation can result in delays or additional requests for evidence. Next Steps As these procedures are implemented, applicants should ensure that all submitted materials are accurate and verifiable. We recommend a thorough review of all public information and documentation prior to filing. If you have questions regarding how these procedural changes may affect your specific case, our team is available to discuss the current requirements and help navigate the updated process.
Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.
