U.S. Tax Requirements for U.S. Tax Residents.
Olga Guzhva • January 11, 2024
When considering immigration to the United States, people often search for the ins and outs of the varied visa options, cost of leaving, education opportunities for kids, but they seldom inquire about the implications of the U.S. taxation. If you do a Google search about U.S. immigration, you’d come across a lot of information about varied visas and their eligibility requirements, the process of obtaining a green card or naturalization, and so on. The information about U.S. tax rules would not appear in your Google search unless you specifically search for it.
- As part of your immigration planning, it is very important to be aware of and understand the U.S. tax obligations, specifically if you have assets in your home country.
- Additionally, if you decide to open your new U.S. business and apply for an immigrant visa, such as EB-1 or EB-2 NIW, or a non-immigrant visa, such as E-2 or L-1, you’d also want to know what taxes you and your business entity would be required to pay.
- Even if you don’t immigrate to the United States but choose to work there based on a temporary nonimmigrant visa, you may be subject to U.S. taxation.
In general, (1) U.S. tax residents are taxed in the same manner as U.S. citizens - on their worldwide income, while (2) nonresidents are generally taxed on U.S. source income and income effectively connected with U.S. trade or business.
Income of residents is subject to the graduated tax rates that apply to U.S. citizens. Residents use the Tax Table and Tax Rate Schedules which apply to U.S. citizens found in the Instructions for Form 1040 and Form 1040-SR2.
Residency Under U.S. Tax Law
Taxation of an individual who is not a U.S. citizen or U.S. national is dependent on the residency status of such individual.
If you are a U.S. resident, you must report all interest, dividends, wages, or other compensation for services, income from rental property or royalties, and other types of income on your U.S. tax return. You must report
these amounts whether they are earned within or outside
the United States.
Note:
U.S. resident for immigration purposes is not always the same as US resident for tax purposes.
Who is the U.S. Tax Resident?
- U.S. citizen is a US resident for U.S. income tax purposes.
- An immigrant who obtains a green card is treated as a lawful permanent resident for immigration purposes and is considered a U.S. tax resident for U.S. income tax purposes.
- Foreign national could be a U.S. resident for U.S. income tax purposes under the substantial presence test.
- Foreign nationals may choose to be treated as dual status residents for this taxable year if certain tests are met. To learn more, refer to Publication 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens.
- You are a dual-status individual when you have been both a U.S. resident and a nonresident in the same tax year.
- Dual status does not refer to your citizenship, only to your resident status for tax purposes in the United States.
- In determining your U.S. income tax liability for a dual-status tax year, different rules apply for the part of the year you are a resident of the United States and the part of the year you are a nonresident. The most common dual-status tax years are the years of arrival and departure.
When planning your immigration to the United States, smart strategic planning of your immigration process, as well as evaluating your future U.S. tax obligations, are essential to your piece of mind in avoiding any pit falls and issues in dealing with the IRS. Navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration and tax laws often requires professional legal guidance. Seeking assistance from an experienced immigration attorney well versed in U.S. taxation can significantly enhance the chances of your successful immigration planning, ensuring compliance with these intricate regulations and requirements.
If you have any questions about what this means for you, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys.
We look forward to working with you!
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
