ACTUALIZACIÓN: Un tribunal federal aplaza la norma del DHS que elimina la «duración de estatus» (D/S)

Juliana LaMendola • September 22, 2026

Click here to read this article in English

El 14 de septiembre de 2026, el Tribunal de Distrito de los Estados Unidos para el Distrito de Massachusetts dictó una medida cautelar de ámbito nacional en el caso «Alianza de Rectores sobre Educación Superior e Inmigración contra el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de los Estados Unidos», por la que se suspendía la aplicación de la norma definitiva del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) que tenía previsto eliminar la «duración del estatus» (D/S siglas en inglés) el 15 de septiembre de 2026. Como consecuencia de esta orden de ámbito nacional, el DHS no puede aplicar períodos fijos de admisión a los estudiantes con visado F-1, a los visitantes de intercambio con visado J-1 y a los representantes de los medios de comunicación con visado I mientras el litigio siga su curso.


Dado que el marco actual de «duración del estatus» sigue plenamente vigente, los titulares de visados F, J e I no están obligados, por el momento, a presentar el formulario I-539 de solicitud de prórroga de estancia para mantener su estatus válido más allá de las fechas de finalización de los programas. Además, las restricciones a los traslados académicos, las limitaciones para matricularse en segundos programas del mismo nivel académico, los límites de 240 días para la continuidad del empleo mientras las prórrogas están pendientes y los períodos de gracia reducidos no se aplican durante la medida cautelar. Los titulares de visados F-1 conservan íntegramente el período de gracia de 60 días tras la finalización de los estudios, y los titulares de visados J-1 mantienen su período de gracia de 30 días. No obstante, hay que tener en cuenta que esta medida cautelar no es una resolución definitiva que invalide la norma, y que está prevista una vista preliminar para el 2 de octubre de 2026 con el fin de determinar los próximos pasos en el litigio.


Consejos prácticos para poner en práctica de inmediato:


  • Comprobación de los registros de viaje del formulario I-94 al reingresar: Los titulares de visados F, J e I admitidos actualmente con la indicación «D/S» conservan su estatus y deben seguir siendo readmitidos con la indicación «D/S» tras un viaje al extranjero hasta que se levante la orden judicial. Sin embargo, dado que el registro I-94 regula la estancia legal, los viajeros deben comprobar su formulario I-94 expedido por la CBP inmediatamente tras su reentrada para confirmar que la «Fecha de admisión hasta» indica «D/S» en lugar de una fecha de caducidad específica. Si se ha registrado por error una fecha específica, póngase en contacto con un centro de inspección diferida de la CBP local.


  • Notificar al departamento de Recursos Humanos y revisar el cumplimiento en el lugar de trabajo: Los empleadores que patrocinen a empleados con visados F-1 o J-1 deben informar al departamento de recursos humanos y a los responsables de contratación de que se ha aplazado la norma de período fijo del 15 de septiembre y que se aplican las normas estándar de «D/S». Esta novedad no altera los plazos estándar de presentación ni los procedimientos de verificación del formulario I-9 para las prórrogas del OPT tras la finalización de los estudios o del OPT para titulados en STEM.


  • Mantener la preparación operativa y aplazar las presentaciones innecesarias: Los titulares de visados y los empleadores deben aplazar las decisiones sobre viajes o estrategias de presentación tomadas únicamente en previsión de la norma de admisión de duración determinada. Dado que el DHS podría presentar un recurso o que el tribunal podría modificar el calendario con poca antelación, las instituciones y los titulares de visados deben mantenerse preparados para ajustar sus planes si se reanuda la aplicación de la norma.


Este litigio presenta muchos aspectos que evolucionan constantemente. Si eres titular de un visado F-1, J-1 o I, o si eres una institución patrocinadora o un empleador, debes coordinarte de forma proactiva con tu oficina de estudiantes internacionales y con tu asesor jurídico para proteger tu situación y estar al tanto de los próximos procedimientos judiciales.

Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea.

Juliana LaMendola


By Juliana LaMendola September 22, 2026
On September 14, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security , halting the implementation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) final rule that was scheduled to eliminate “duration of status” (D/S) on September 15, 2026. As a result of this nationwide order, DHS is blocked from enforcing fixed periods of admission for F-1 students, J-1 exchange visitors, and I media representatives while the litigation moves forward. Because the current “duration of status” framework remains in full effect, F, J, and I visa holders are not required to file Form I-539 extension of stay applications to remain in valid status beyond program end dates at this time. Furthermore, restrictions on academic transfers, constraints on enrolling in second programs at the same degree level, 240-day caps on continued employment while extensions are pending, and shortened grace periods do not apply during the injunction. F-1 nonimmigrants retain the full 60-day post-completion grace period, and J-1 holders maintain their 30-day grace period. However, please note that this preliminary injunction is not a final ruling invalidating the rule , and a status conference is scheduled for October 2, 2026, to determine next steps in the litigation. Immediate Practice Tips: Inspect I-94 Travel Records Upon Reentry: F, J, and I visa holders currently admitted under D/S retain their status and should continue to be readmitted under D/S following international travel until the injunction is lifted. However, because the I-94 record controls legal stay, travelers must inspect their CBP-issued Form I-94 immediately upon reentry to confirm the "Admit Until Date" states "D/S" rather than a specific expiration date. If a specific date is mistakenly recorded, contact a local CPB Deferred Inspection Site. Notify HR and Review Workplace Compliance: Employers sponsoring F-1 or J-1 employees should inform HR and hiring managers that the September 15 fixed-period rule is postponed and standard D/S rules govern. This development does not alter standard filing windows or Form I-9 verification procedures for post-completion OPT or STEM OPT extensions.  Maintain Operational Readiness and Defer Unnecessary Filings: Visa holders and employers should defer travel or filing strategy decisions made solely in anticipation of the fixed-admission rule. Because DHS may appeal or the court could alter the timeline on short notice, institutions and visa holders should maintain readiness to adjust plans if implementation resumes. There are many evolving components to this litigation. If you are an F-1, J-1, or I visa holder, sponsoring institution, or employer, you should proactively coordinate with your international student office and legal counsel to protect your status and monitor upcoming court proceedings.
By Juliana LaMendola September 3, 2026
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published its final rule eliminating the longstanding "duration of status" (D/S) policy for F, J, and I visa holders, replacing it with a fixed period of admission effective September 15, 2026. This rule requires that those who need additional time to complete their programs must file Form I-539 with USCIS or travel abroad and seek to reenter to extend their authorized period of stay. F and J visa holders present in the U.S. and in valid status on September 15, 2026, will be allowed to remain in the United States until the Program End Date listed on their current Form I-20 (for F-1s) or Form DS-2019 (for J-1s), up to a maximum of four years (until September 15, 2030) plus a 60-day grace period for F-1s and a 30-day grace period for J-1s, without filing an Extension of Status request with USCIS. However, this safety net only applies while staying in the U.S.; international travel and subsequent reentry after September 15, 2026 will result in readmission under the new rule with an I-94 that expires on the Program End Date or Employment Authorization Document (EAD) expiration, but no later than four-years after their date of re-entry. Additionally, once re-admitted under the new rules, F-1s will only receive a 30-day grace period. Immediate Practice Tips: Any F-1 or J-1 nonimmigrant currently in the U.S. who plans to change programs, start a new degree level, or needs more time to complete their studies must work with their school or program sponsor to update their SEVIS record and receive an extended Form I-20 or DS-2019 before September 15, 2026. Eligible F-1 students should submit their post-completion OPT or STEM OPT work authorization applications (Form I-765) before September 15, 2026, to secure their status and drastically reduce the likelihood of needing a Form I-539 extension application. Any F-1 student who is eligible to apply for OPT or STEM OPT before March 18, 2027, should do so as soon as they are eligible to file their Form I-765. Since F-1s can file OPT applications up to 90 days in advance of graduation, F-1 students graduating before June 15,2027, should be able to file their OPT applications before March 18, 2027, and should do so to avoid also having to file Form I-539 to extend their stay. Thus, most F-1 students graduating in December 2026 and May/June 2027 should be able to take advantage of the transition rule’s delay in having to file Form I-539 applications and should only need to file Form I-765 to apply for OPT. Incoming F-1 and J-1 students who can enter the United States before the September 15, 2026 effective date (within the permissible 30-day window prior to their program start) should do so to benefit from the transition rules, including the full 60-day F-1 grace period and deferred extension requirements. Students (F-1 and J-1) who are planning international travel should return before the effective date if possible to preserve their transition benefits.  There are many parts of the rule that are not discussed here. If you are currently an F-1 or J-1 visa holder, you should proactively coordinate with your institutions and international office to protect your status and stay informed.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar August 27, 2026
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released updated policy guidance detailing how officers will evaluate "public charge" inadmissibility for individuals applying for green cards through adjustment of status. This update follows a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) final rule that rescinds the 2022 public charge regulations. The new policy takes effect on September 18, 2026 , and applies to all green card applications (Form I-485) postmarked or submitted on or after that date. Who Is Subject to the Public Charge Rule? Most family-based and employment-based green card applicants will be subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This includes spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents, as well as most employment visa preference categories, investors, and diversity visa applicants. Certain categories remain explicitly exempt under immigration law. These include: Asylees and refugees Victims of human trafficking (T visa) or crime (U visa) Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners Special Immigrant Juveniles Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Certain military-related applicants and other designated humanitarian groups How USCIS Will Make Determinations USCIS officers will evaluate whether an applicant is likely to become a public charge by reviewing the totality of their circumstances on a case-by-case basis. Key factors include: Five Statutory Factors: Age, health, family status, assets/financial resources, and education or skills. Affidavit of Support: Submission of Form I-864 executed by a sponsor. Use of Public Benefits: USCIS will look at means-tested public benefits, such as cash assistance for income maintenance, housing assistance, food stamps (SNAP), or college financial aid. Note on timing: For benefits received before September 18, 2026, USCIS will only consider public cash assistance for income maintenance and long-term institutionalization at government expense. For benefits received on or after September 18, 2026, the broader consideration of all listed means-tested benefits will apply. Public Charge Bonds If an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible solely on public charge grounds, USCIS may issue a Notice of Intent to Deny that invites the applicant to post a public charge bond using Form I-945. If an invited applicant successfully posts the required cash or surety bond, USCIS may approve the application for permanent residence. Public charge bonds can only be submitted if explicitly invited by USCIS. Santos Lloyd Law Firm will continue to monitor immigration developments closely and provide updates as further implementation details are released. For more information, please access: https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/uscis-issues-guidance-on-making-public-charge-inadmissibility-determination
Show More