ACTUALIZACIÓN: Un tribunal federal aplaza la norma del DHS que elimina la «duración de estatus» (D/S)

Juliana LaMendola • September 22, 2026

Click here to read this article in English

El 14 de septiembre de 2026, el Tribunal de Distrito de los Estados Unidos para el Distrito de Massachusetts dictó una medida cautelar de ámbito nacional en el caso «Alianza de Rectores sobre Educación Superior e Inmigración contra el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de los Estados Unidos», por la que se suspendía la aplicación de la norma definitiva del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) que tenía previsto eliminar la «duración del estatus» (D/S siglas en inglés) el 15 de septiembre de 2026. Como consecuencia de esta orden de ámbito nacional, el DHS no puede aplicar períodos fijos de admisión a los estudiantes con visado F-1, a los visitantes de intercambio con visado J-1 y a los representantes de los medios de comunicación con visado I mientras el litigio siga su curso.


Dado que el marco actual de «duración del estatus» sigue plenamente vigente, los titulares de visados F, J e I no están obligados, por el momento, a presentar el formulario I-539 de solicitud de prórroga de estancia para mantener su estatus válido más allá de las fechas de finalización de los programas. Además, las restricciones a los traslados académicos, las limitaciones para matricularse en segundos programas del mismo nivel académico, los límites de 240 días para la continuidad del empleo mientras las prórrogas están pendientes y los períodos de gracia reducidos no se aplican durante la medida cautelar. Los titulares de visados F-1 conservan íntegramente el período de gracia de 60 días tras la finalización de los estudios, y los titulares de visados J-1 mantienen su período de gracia de 30 días. No obstante, hay que tener en cuenta que esta medida cautelar no es una resolución definitiva que invalide la norma, y que está prevista una vista preliminar para el 2 de octubre de 2026 con el fin de determinar los próximos pasos en el litigio.


Consejos prácticos para poner en práctica de inmediato:


  • Comprobación de los registros de viaje del formulario I-94 al reingresar: Los titulares de visados F, J e I admitidos actualmente con la indicación «D/S» conservan su estatus y deben seguir siendo readmitidos con la indicación «D/S» tras un viaje al extranjero hasta que se levante la orden judicial. Sin embargo, dado que el registro I-94 regula la estancia legal, los viajeros deben comprobar su formulario I-94 expedido por la CBP inmediatamente tras su reentrada para confirmar que la «Fecha de admisión hasta» indica «D/S» en lugar de una fecha de caducidad específica. Si se ha registrado por error una fecha específica, póngase en contacto con un centro de inspección diferida de la CBP local.


  • Notificar al departamento de Recursos Humanos y revisar el cumplimiento en el lugar de trabajo: Los empleadores que patrocinen a empleados con visados F-1 o J-1 deben informar al departamento de recursos humanos y a los responsables de contratación de que se ha aplazado la norma de período fijo del 15 de septiembre y que se aplican las normas estándar de «D/S». Esta novedad no altera los plazos estándar de presentación ni los procedimientos de verificación del formulario I-9 para las prórrogas del OPT tras la finalización de los estudios o del OPT para titulados en STEM.


  • Mantener la preparación operativa y aplazar las presentaciones innecesarias: Los titulares de visados y los empleadores deben aplazar las decisiones sobre viajes o estrategias de presentación tomadas únicamente en previsión de la norma de admisión de duración determinada. Dado que el DHS podría presentar un recurso o que el tribunal podría modificar el calendario con poca antelación, las instituciones y los titulares de visados deben mantenerse preparados para ajustar sus planes si se reanuda la aplicación de la norma.


Este litigio presenta muchos aspectos que evolucionan constantemente. Si eres titular de un visado F-1, J-1 o I, o si eres una institución patrocinadora o un empleador, debes coordinarte de forma proactiva con tu oficina de estudiantes internacionales y con tu asesor jurídico para proteger tu situación y estar al tanto de los próximos procedimientos judiciales.

Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea.

Juliana LaMendola

Your Visa Status Says Refused After the Interview: Understanding Section 221(g)

By Santos Lloyd Team • November 5, 2026
You attend your visa interview expecting a clear answer, then check your case online and see the word “Refused.” For someone planning to reunite with family, begin a job, or return to an established life in the United States, that message can be unsettling.

Can You Work for More Than One Employer on an O-1B Visa?

By Santos Lloyd Team • October 29, 2026
An artist receives an invitation to join a new production. A business professional is offered a consulting role alongside an existing position. A musician wants to perform for several organizers during the same season. For professionals whose careers involve multiple projects, an important immigration question often follows: can an O-1B visa cover work for more than one employer? The answer can be yes, but the employment arrangements must be covered by the appropriate petition structure. An O-1B approval does not provide unrestricted permission to accept any job in the United States. Your approved work arrangements matter The O-1B category allows qualifying individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement to work in their area of expertise. However, eligibility based on professional accomplishments is only part of the case. The petition must also establish the proposed work and the relationship between the professional and the petitioner. Before accepting an additional position, your attorney should review who filed the existing petition, the work it covers, and how the proposed opportunity fits into that arrangement. A valid visa and an unexpired approval notice do not answer those questions on their own. Separate employers or an agent petition When an O-1B beneficiary works for multiple employers during the same period, each employer generally files a separate petition unless an established U.S. agent files a petition covering the arrangement. An agent petition can be useful when a professional’s work involves several employers or engagements. Depending on the arrangement, the agent may act as an actual employer as well or only represent the employers and the professional. The petition must document the agent’s role and the proposed employment. For an agent petition involving multiple employers, the supporting documents include contracts and an itinerary identifying the engagements, their dates, the actual employers, and the locations where services will be performed. Your attorney will determine the documentation needed for your particular structure. A new opportunity may require another filing If you change employers while in the United States, a new petition is generally required. When the original case was filed through an agent, an amended petition may be necessary to address the new employer. Material changes to the approved employment terms can also require an amendment. There is a specific provision allowing petitioners for artists and entertainers to add qualifying performances or engagements during the petition’s validity without an amended petition. That flexibility should not be treated as blanket permission to change employers or accept unrelated work. Your attorney should assess whether it applies to the proposed engagement. Review the opportunity before agreeing to a start date  A promising offer can come with a short deadline. Sharing the proposed contract, duties, employer information, and anticipated dates with your attorney early can help clarify the immigration requirements before business commitments are made. Your attorney will confirm whether the work is already covered, whether another petition is needed, and when you may begin. Do not assume that submitting a new petition automatically authorizes work for the new employer. Contact Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. If you believe you may qualify for the O-1B status and to discuss a filing strategy that fits your professional plans.

Your Two-Year Green Card Is Expiring: How to Prepare for a Joint I-751 Petition

By Santo Lloyd Team • October 22, 2026
 Receiving a two-year green card through marriage is an important step, but it leaves another process ahead: removing the conditions on permanent residence. For couples preparing a joint Form I-751 petition, understanding the filing window and organizing evidence early can make the preparation more manageable. The starting point is your own record. Locate the green card, the notice granting residence, and copies of the earlier immigration filing. Check the date conditional residence began and the card’s expiration date. Do not calculate the next deadline solely from your wedding anniversary or the date an attorney first submitted your case. Understand the joint filing window Under 8 CFR 216.4 , a joint I-751 petition generally must be filed during the 90-day period immediately before the second anniversary of obtaining conditional permanent residence. This is a window before that anniversary, not an additional 90 days after the card expires. Preparing early and filing early are different things. You can begin gathering records well before the window opens, while coordinating the correct submission date with your attorney. A joint petition also requires the appropriate signatures, fee, and supporting documentation. Confirm the current form instructions, accepted filing method, and applicable fee when the case is ready to submit. Build a record of the marriage over time The regulation identifies several types of evidence that may help show the marriage was not entered into to evade immigration law: jointly owned property, a lease for a shared home, combined financial resources, children’s birth certificates, and statements from people with personal knowledge of the relationship. These examples do not mean every couple must have a mortgage, joint accounts, or children. The evidence should accurately reflect your circumstances. A clear explanation of how you manage your household can be more useful than forcing your relationship into a checklist that does not fit. As a practical preparation step, organize records by date and type. Review whether they help explain the course of the marriage, rather than collecting only documents created shortly before filing. Flag separate addresses, name changes, or gaps in the records for your attorney. Never alter a document to make the history appear simpler. Tell your attorney if circumstances change This article addresses joint filing. Divorce, the death of a spouse, abuse, or other significant changes may require a different filing basis or an individualized assessment. Separate waiver provisions exist, with their own requirements. A spouse’s unwillingness to sign does not, by itself, establish eligibility for every waiver. Do not assume that the joint 90-day window answers every question about a non-joint case. If the relationship changes while preparing the petition or while it is pending, inform counsel promptly. You should not need to invent a continuing relationship to seek advice about the options that may actually apply. Keep tracking the case after submission The regulation provides that conditional resident status is automatically extended, when necessary, upon receipt of a properly filed I-751 until adjudication. Proof of that status is a separate practical matter: keep the receipt notice and have counsel review its wording before relying on it for travel or employment documentation. This article does not promise a particular receipt-extension period or processing time. A missed deadline calls for prompt legal attention. The regulation allows some late joint filings where USCIS accepts a written showing of good cause, but acceptance is not automatic. Do not assume a late petition cures the problem without further review. Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. can help you assess the filing window, organize relevant evidence, and identify changes that may affect your I-751 strategy. Contact the firm early enough to review the facts before the deadline approaches.
Show More