El cambio en la política de género del USCIS preocupa a los solicitantes de asilo por motivos de identidad de género

Angelica Rice • April 17, 2025

 Click here to read this article in English

El 31 de marzo de 2025, el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de Estados Unidos (USCIS) implementó una actualización de política que limita las selecciones de marcador de género en todos los formularios y sistemas de inmigración a dos sexos biológicos: masculino y femenino. Este cambio elimina la opción de que los solicitantes seleccionen un marcador de género no binario o «X», una opción que antes se permitía en algunos formularios.


Si bien USCIS hace hincapié en que esta actualización no cambia quién califica para los beneficios de inmigración, puede afectar significativamente la forma en que ciertas solicitudes - en particular las solicitudes de asilo basadas en la persecución relacionada con la identidad de género - se entienden y evalúan.


¿Qué ha cambiado?


Con arreglo a la nueva política, los solicitantes sólo podrán elegir «masculino» o «femenino» al cumplimentar los formularios del USCIS. La posibilidad de seleccionar una opción no binaria o de tercer género ya no está disponible.


Los solicitantes todavía pueden pedir cambiar su marcador de género con USCIS, pero sólo dentro del binario masculino/femenino. No se requiere documentación de apoyo, como registros médicos o legales, para realizar el cambio. Esto significa que las personas transgénero aún pueden alinear su marcador de género con su identidad -si entra dentro de las dos categorías binarias-, pero las personas no binarias ya no están representadas.


El cambio se produce a raíz de las orientaciones publicadas por la Oficina Federal de Gestión y Presupuesto (OMB por sus siglas en inglés), que pedía una mayor coherencia en la recogida de datos sobre sexo y género en todos los organismos federales.


Impacto en los solicitantes de asilo


Esta actualización de la política es especialmente importante para las personas que solicitan asilo por persecución relacionada con su identidad de género. Según la ley de inmigración estadounidense, pueden solicitar asilo las personas que hayan sufrido persecución -o teman sufrirla en el futuro- por pertenecer a un «grupo social determinado». Esto incluye a las personas perseguidas por ser transexuales, no conformistas con su género o por no ajustarse a los roles de género socialmente esperados en su país de origen.


Aunque la norma jurídica para el asilo no cambia, la eliminación del marcador de género no binario podría dificultar a algunos solicitantes la presentación y documentación claras de su identidad. En los casos de asilo, la credibilidad y la claridad son cruciales. La capacidad de reflejar con precisión la propia identidad de género en los formularios oficiales puede desempeñar un papel importante a la hora de establecer los fundamentos de una solicitud de persecución.


Ahora, los solicitantes que se identifican como no binarios o fuera de las categorías tradicionales masculino/femenino pueden verse obligados a seleccionar un género que no se ajusta a su experiencia vivida. Esto podría dar lugar a confusión en su expediente o requerir explicaciones adicionales durante las entrevistas o audiencias. Esta política podría debilitar la solidez de algunas solicitudes de asilo, no porque los hechos subyacentes hayan cambiado, sino porque ahora los formularios oficiales no reflejan la verdadera identidad del solicitante.


Por ejemplo:


  • Una persona no binaria que solicita asilo tras haber sido perseguida en su país de origen puede tener que seleccionar «Hombre» o «Mujer» en su solicitud de asilo, a pesar de no identificarse como ninguno de los dos.
  • Este desajuste puede llevar a los adjudicadores a cuestionar la identidad del solicitante, lo que posiblemente debilite la solidez de la solicitud o exija aclaraciones y documentación adicionales.
  • En los casos de asilo defensivo, en los que los solicitantes se encuentran en proceso de expulsión, estas incoherencias pueden crear obstáculos innecesarios y complicar la presentación de pruebas.


¿Qué pueden hacer los solicitantes?


A pesar del cambio, las personas pueden seguir solicitando asilo por motivos de identidad de género. Los criterios de elegibilidad subyacentes siguen siendo los mismos. Sin embargo, los solicitantes deben estar preparados para explicar claramente cualquier diferencia entre su identidad declarada y el marcador de género requerido en los formularios de USCIS.


Se recomienda a los solicitantes que:


  • Incluir una declaración personal explicando detalladamente su identidad de género y cómo se relaciona con su temor de persecución.
  • Aportar pruebas como declaraciones juradas, informes sobre el estado del país o testimonios de expertos que respalden la solicitud.
  •  Trabajar con un abogado de inmigración con experiencia que pueda ayudar a presentar la solicitud de manera eficaz y prepararse para cualquier pregunta que pueda surgir de las nuevas limitaciones del formulario.


La nueva política del USCIS sobre los marcadores de género puede parecer una actualización técnica, pero para los solicitantes de asilo que huyen de la persecución por motivos de género, tiene implicaciones reales. Aunque las personas siguen cumpliendo los requisitos legales para solicitar protección, la limitación a las opciones binarias de género podría dificultar la presentación completa y clara de su caso.


Si usted o alguien que usted conoce está enfrentando desafíos de inmigración relacionados con la identidad de género - o está preocupado acerca de cómo esta política puede afectar una solicitud de asilo - por favor póngase en contacto con Santos Lloyd Law Firm para programar una consulta con uno de nuestros abogados de inmigración con experiencia. Estamos aquí para ayudar a asegurar que su voz sea escuchada y su caso sea manejado con el cuidado y la experiencia que se merece.


Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

Angelica Rice

The Secret Weapon in Your O-1A or EB-1A Petition: A Powerful Letter of Recommendation

By Shirin Navabi • July 17, 2025
For individuals applying under the O-1A or EB-1A categories , both reserved for professionals with extraordinary ability, letters of recommendation are a critical part of the petition. These expert testimonial letters offer valuable insight into your accomplishments, reputation, and influence within your field. When written properly, they help demonstrate that you truly stand out as someone who has risen to the very top of your profession. Many petitions submitted by highly accomplished individuals fall short because the recommendation letters are vague, overly personal, or fail to clearly explain why the applicant meets the legal standard of extraordinary ability. That is why taking the time to prepare your recommenders effectively is not just helpful. It is essential to build a strong and persuasive case. First, it is important to help your recommenders understand the purpose of the letter . This is not a casual reference or character recommendation. It is a formal declaration to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services that you possess extraordinary ability in your area of expertise. The letter must describe your achievements in concrete terms and explain why your work has had a significant impact and recognition within your field. Many professionals, no matter how accomplished, are unfamiliar with the specific requirements of the O-1A and EB-1A categories. It is helpful to provide them with a short explanation of what is needed, and in some cases, a sample or outline to guide them. Selecting the right recommenders is just as critical as the content of the letters themselves. While USCIS gives greater weight to letters from independent experts, independence should not be confused with distance. The ideal recommender is someone who knows your work well and can provide specific and credible insight into your contributions, impact, and reputation in the field. A letter from someone who barely knows you, or one that focuses more on the recommender’s own accomplishments than yours, is unlikely to carry much weight with USCIS. A common mistake is submitting letters that read more like summaries of the recommender’s resume than a meaningful evaluation of your achievements. While a brief introduction of the recommender’s qualifications is important to establish credibility, the focus must remain squarely on you , your work, your innovation, and the ways in which your impact is considered extraordinary. The strongest letters go beyond general praise. They include clear and detailed examples of how your contributions have influenced others in your field or led to measurable outcomes. To make the letter as accurate and persuasive as possible, you should provide your recommenders with a summary of your most important professional milestones. This might include major awards, media coverage, patents, publications, notable leadership roles, or metrics showing the commercial or scientific success of your work. Well-prepared recommendation letters serve as both evidence and narrative. They help fulfill specific legal requirements and also tell the story of how and why your work has earned you distinction. In a category defined by terms like extraordinary ability, it is important that every part of your petition reinforces that standard. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we work closely with our clients and their recommenders to develop strong and compelling testimonial letters that meet USCIS expectations and highlight each applicant’s unique contributions.

Navigating Family-Based Immigration: Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

By Denice Flores • July 10, 2025
Family-based immigration remains one of the most common paths to lawful permanent residency in the United States. It offers a lifeline to families hoping to reunite across borders, but the process is far from simple. The outcome of the applications can be delayed as a result of potential missteps while preparing the applications. Here are some of the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them: Incomplete or Inaccurate Forms One frequent mistake is submitting incomplete or inaccurate information on the forms like the I-130 (Petition for Alien Relative) and the I-485 (Adjustment of Status). Even minor errors such as misspelled names, missing signatures, or incorrect dates—can result in Requests for Evidence. To avoid this misstep, double-check all entries, cross-reference documents, and consult with an attorney before submission. Remember, immigration forms are legal documents so accuracy matters. Insufficient Supporting Evidence Proving a genuine familial relationship is the basis of family-based petitions. For spousal cases, USCIS looks closely at evidence of a bona fide marriage. Little or no supporting documents and evidence may lead to Requests for Evidence and even skepticism from USCIS. To establish a bona fide marriage, include documentation to show shared finances and liabilities. Filing Under the Wrong Category or Preference There are different immigration paths depending on whether the petitioner is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, and whether the beneficiary is a spouse, child, sibling, or parent. Each category has different processing times and visa availability. It is critical that before applying, you understand which preference category applies to your case. Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens (spouses, parents, unmarried children under 21) generally receive faster processing and are not subject to annual visa caps. Not Disclosing Past Immigration or Criminal History Many applicants fail to account for past immigration violations such as visa overstays, unauthorized work, or prior removal orders. Similarly, if you fail to disclose past criminal history and these issues surface later in the process they can affect the outcome of the case. Disclose everything to your attorney, no matter how minor or old the issue seems. Prior violations don’t always mean denial but not disclosing them may lead to serious consequences. If you're considering filing a family-based petition, consult with an experienced immigration attorney at our office. Our office is committed to helping families navigate this complex process with clarity and confidence.

Understanding the Public Charge Rule: What Public Benefits May or May Not Impact Your Immigration Case

By Angelica Rice • July 3, 2025
When applying for a green card or seeking admission into the United States, one of the legal hurdles many applicants may face is the public charge ground of inadmissibility. This test evaluates whether someone is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support. But what exactly does that mean—and what types of public benefits can trigger this issue? In this article, we’ll break down what “public charge” really means, who is affected, what types of public benefits are considered, and what immigrants should be mindful of when making decisions about public programs like Medi-Cal and Medicaid. What Is the Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility? The public charge rule applies to individuals applying for a visa, green card (adjustment of status), or entry into the U.S., unless they fall into an exempt category. Under this rule, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must determine whether the applicant is likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. This typically refers to receiving: Public cash assistance for income maintenance (such as SSI or TANF), or Long-term institutional care at government expense. This determination is based on the "totality of circumstances," including age, health, financial resources, education, skills, and whether a sponsor has submitted a valid Affidavit of Support. Who Is Exempt from the Public Charge Rule? Many categories of immigrants are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. These include: Asylees and refugees Special immigrant juveniles Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitioners T and U visa applicants Temporary Protected Status (TPS) applicants Importantly, even if someone later adjusts status through a different pathway that is subject to public charge, any benefits they received while in an exempt category will not be held against them. What Public Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Test? It is a common and harmful myth that using any public benefit will jeopardize your immigration status. In fact, most non-cash benefits do not count against you in a public charge determination. According to USCIS and DHS guidance, the following types of assistance (current as of July 1, 2025) are not considered: Health-Related Benefits Medi-Cal/Medicaid, except for long-term institutional care Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance through the ACA Marketplace, including subsidies COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment Community health services, crisis counseling, and short-term shelters Food and Nutrition SNAP (Food Stamps) WIC School meal programs Food banks and emergency food assistance Housing and Energy Emergency shelter Rental assistance (e.g., McKinney-Vento programs) Energy assistance (e.g., LIHEAP) Education and Childcare Public schooling Head Start Childcare subsidies (e.g., CCDF) Educational grants and scholarships Federal Cash and Tax Benefits Earned income tax credit (EITC) Child Tax Credit (CTC) Stimulus checks Unemployment insurance Social Security and veteran’s benefits Disaster and pandemic-related cash aid In short, just because a benefit is public or government-funded doesn’t automatically make it count against you. A Word of Caution About Medi-Cal and Medicaid, in Particular As of today (07/01/2025), standard use of Medi-Cal (California’s version of Medicaid) or Medicaid for most health-related services is not considered in a public charge determination. This includes preventative care, emergency services, pregnancy-related services, and short-term care. However, if Medicaid is used for long-term institutionalization, such as in a nursing home or psychiatric facility, that does count under the public charge test. Despite current guidance, we are seeing political shifts and changes in tone from the current administration that suggest public charge policies may become more restrictive in the future. This includes renewed interest in expanding the types of public benefits that may be considered, particularly around medical assistance. For that reason, we generally recommend that individuals who are applying for adjustment of status, or who may be subject to the public charge ground in the future, avoid enrolling in Medi-Cal or Medicaid at this time, unless absolutely necessary. Final Thoughts Immigration law is complex, and the rules surrounding public charge can feel confusing or even frightening. But it’s important to understand that using most public benefits—especially for food, education, and healthcare—will not automatically jeopardize your green card or visa application. Still, because policy can change quickly, we urge individuals to consult with an immigration attorney before applying for any public assistance—especially healthcare programs like Medi-Cal or Medicaid. If you have questions or concerns about how public benefits might impact your immigration case, our office is here to help. We are committed to providing up-to-date, personalized guidance to keep your immigration journey on track. Disclaimer The information provided herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every immigration case is unique, and the application of the public charge rule may vary depending on your specific situation. If you believe this topic may apply to you or you need individualized legal guidance, we encourage you to contact one of our highly-qualified legal professionals for a consultation and assistance tailored to your circumstances. Resources: USCIS Public Charge Resources ILRC Medi-Cal and Public Charge Alert (2024) California Medi-Cal Immigrant Eligibility FAQ
Show More