Entendiendo el Memorando del 28 de enero de 2025, “Vacatur” sobre el Estatus de Protección Temporal para Venezuela (TPS Venezuela)

Angelica Rice • January 31, 2025

Click here to read this article in English

El 28 de enero de 2025, la Secretaría de Seguridad Nacional, Kristi Noem, anuló la decisión del 10 de enero de 2025 del anterior secretario, Alejandro Mayorkas, que había prorrogado la designación de 2023 del Estatus de Protección Temporal (TPS por sus siglas en inglés) para Venezuela y ordenó que se anulara su notificación del 17 de enero de 2025 que volvía a designar el TPS para Venezuela. Esta acción, comprensiblemente, ha causado confusión y preocupación entre los beneficiarios de TPS de Venezuela y aquellos con solicitudes pendientes.

Es fundamental aclarar que esto no significa que el programa de TPS para Venezuela ha sido eliminado. Por el contrario, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS por sus siglas en inglés) ahora debe reconsiderar si volver a designar (extender) o terminar las designaciones anteriores de TPS para Venezuela de 2021 y 2023.

¿Qué significa el Vacatur?

Debido a que la extensión de TPS del 17 de enero de 2025 fue anulada, la designación de TPS válida más reciente para Venezuela sigue siendo la designación del 3 de octubre de 2023. El vacatur no afecta inmediatamente las protecciones de TPS para individuos cubiertos bajo las designaciones previas. Sin embargo, el DHS debe tomar decisiones clave en los próximos meses:

  • Antes del 1 de febrero de 2025, el DHS deberá decidir si prorroga o revoca la designación del 3 de octubre de 2023.


  • Antes del 12 de julio de 2025, el DHS deberá decidir si prorroga o revoca la designación del 9 de marzo de 2021.


  • Si el secretario no toma una determinación oportuna (por ejemplo, si el secretario no tomara una determinación antes del 1 de febrero de 2025 sobre si extender o terminar la designación del TPS de Venezuela de 2023), entonces el estatuto prevé una extensión automática de la designación por un período adicional de 6 meses. INA 244(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1254a(b)(3)(C).


Hasta que se tomen estas decisiones,
el TPS sigue en vigor bajo las designaciones anteriores, y aquellos a los que ya se les ha concedido el TPS no se ven afectados inmediatamente.

¿A quién afecta y qué debe hacer?

Titulares actuales de TPS

Si ya se le otorgó el TPS bajo las designaciones del 9 de marzo de 2021 o del 3 de octubre de 2023, su estatus sigue siendo válido. Debe continuar cumpliendo con todos los requisitos de reinscripción para mantener su protección y autorización de trabajo.

Período de reinscripción:

  • Los beneficiarios del TPS bajo las designaciones de 2021 y 2023 deben reinscribirse entre el 17 de enero de 2025 y el 10 de septiembre de 2025 para mantener su estatus legal y autorización de trabajo.


Individuos con solicitudes de TPS pendientes al 17 de enero de 2025

Si usted solicitó TPS antes del 17 de enero de 2025, bajo una designación previa, su solicitud continuará siendo procesada. Si su solicitud es aprobada, su protección de TPS permanecerá válida por lo menos hasta el 2 de abril de 2025. No es necesario volver a solicitarlo.

Personas que solicitaron el TPS entre el 10 de enero de 2025 y el 28 de enero de 2025

Si usted solicitó TPS durante este período, USCIS dejará de procesar sus solicitudes y emitirá reembolsos de cualquier tarifa pagada en asociación con esas solicitudes. Adicionalmente, USCIS invalidará los EADs; Formularios 1-797, Notificación de Acción (Notificación de Aprobación); y Formularios 1-94, Registro de Llegada/Salida (conocidos colectivamente como documentación relacionada con el TPS) que hayan sido emitidos con fecha de expiración del 2 de octubre de 2026 bajo la Notificación Mayorkas del 17 de enero de 2025.

¿Qué pasará después?

Dado el apoyo previo de la administración Biden al TPS, muchos esperan que el DHS extienda o reasigne a Venezuela para el TPS en lugar de terminarlo. Sin embargo, no se ha tomado una decisión final, y los ciudadanos venezolanos con TPS o solicitudes pendientes deben continuar siguiendo de cerca las actualizaciones.

¿Qué debe hacer ahora?

  • Si actualmente tiene TPS, continúe cumpliendo con todos los requisitos de renovación del TPS y manténgase al tanto de las próximas decisiones del DHS.


  • Si usted tiene una solicitud pendiente, revise las actualizaciones de USCIS regularmente y consulte con un abogado de inmigración para la orientación más reciente.


  • Si usted solicitó entre el 17 de enero de 2025 y el 28 de enero de 2025, busque asesoría legal para entender cómo el Vacatur puede afectar su solicitud.


Manténgase informado y obtenga orientación legal

Nuestra firma de inmigración está siguiendo de cerca estos acontecimientos y proporcionará actualizaciones tan pronto como el DHS tome su decisión. Si usted tiene preguntas acerca de su estatus de TPS o cómo este memorando afecta su caso, póngase en contacto con nuestra oficina hoy para una consulta.

Para más información, consulte el anuncio oficial del DHS sobre el Vacatur:

Vacatur of 2025TemporaryProtected Status Decision for Venezuela.


Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice


By Joseph Lennarz April 23, 2026
Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar April 9, 2026
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has concluded the annual H-1B cap lottery for Fiscal Year 2027, with employers and legal representatives now able to check selection outcomes through their registration portals.
By Kathya Dawe April 3, 2026
In 1948, the world came together to declare that certain rights are inherent to every human being, regardless of nationality. Chief among these is the right to safety. The Universal Right to Seek Safety The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), specifically Article 14, guarantees that "everyone has the right to
Show More