What are the qualifications for an EB-1A Visa?
April Perez • January 5, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish
An EB-1(a)
is a visa for those that can prove they have an Extraordinary Ability or Achievement in the sciences, arts, education, business or athletics
through sustained national or international acclaim.
Sustained national or international acclaim is proven by showing that you have a one-time achievement or major award such as a Nobel Prize, Grammy or an Oscar or
that you can meet at least three
of the criteria below by providing adequate evidence (examples below):
- Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Evidence of an award can include: a certificate, a list of the criteria for the award, meaning how the winners are selected, and background on the award to show that it is a national or international award.
- Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
Evidence of membership can include: a membership certificate or letter from an official from the organization verifying your membership.
Evidence that the association demands outstanding achievements of their members can include: background on how the members are selected through official website links, background information on who selects the members, bylaws of the organization stating how members are selected and who selects them, background of other members, background on those who select members, articles about the organization, and background links about the organization.
- Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence of published material should show the source of the publication. You should also provide circulation numbers on the publication if it is in print, if it is an article published through a website it should be a website from a major publication that has a high volume of traffic. - Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel
Evidence of being a judge can include: a letter from the organization you were a judge for or the event you were a judge for explaining how you were selected, what the judging consisted of, and background on the event or organization you were a judge for.
- Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field
Evidence that the contribution was original can be: through a patent, or other verifying documentation.
Evidence that it was of major significance can be: shown through application by other organizations in the field of your original contribution, and contracts or letters verifying the wide use of your contribution. - Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence can include: the article you published, evidence of where it was published, and evidence of the number of times the article was cited by others.
- Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Evidence can include: articles, flyers and other promotional materials for the exhibition. Contracts, and photos of the exhibition. Proof of sales of any work sold at the exhibition. - Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations
Evidence can include: letters from former employers explaining how your work was critical for the organization as a whole.
Evidence that the organization is distinguished can be: articles about the organization, awards the organization has won, and background on the organization.
- Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Evidence can be: paystubs, income taxes or other proof of payment for work in your field. The payments should be quantified, meaning that you need to prove how much you were paid per hour or per year for your work. - Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts
Evidence can include ticket, record, or video sales or box office receipts.
This is not an exhaustive list of possible evidence, and in some fields the evidence may not fall directly within the parameters of the criteria.
Aside from the criteria you must also be able to show that you will continue to work in your field of expertise.
USCIS will first determine whether you meet at least three of the criteria, and if you do, they will move on to do a final merits determination as to whether you are extraordinary.
An alien who falls within this category may self-petition by filing the proper forms and evidence. The idea of being “extraordinary” sounds simple, but you must be able to prove that you qualify. It is important to have the proper guidance from an attorney through this process.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
Similar Posts
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish
The United States has long been a destination for the world’s most talented athletes—not only to compete at the highest level, but to access world-class training, coaching opportunities, and long-term career prospects. Whether on the field, in the ring, or across the chessboard, athletes from across the globe are finding immigration pathways that allow them to pursue their athletic and professional goals in the U.S. U.S. immigration law offers several visa and green card options designed specifically for individuals with extraordinary athletic talent. These include the P-1A visa for internationally recognized athletes, the O-1A visa for individuals of extraordinary ability, and the EB-1A immigrant petition, which can lead to permanent residency and ultimately, U.S. citizenship. The P-1A visa is commonly used by professional athletes coming to the U.S. to compete in a specific event or season. This applies not only to individual athletes but also to members of teams or clubs recognized internationally. It is widely used by soccer players, basketball players, MMA fighters, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competitors, and even elite chess players. Athletes must demonstrate a high level of international recognition and a record of performance in their sport. The O-1A visa is a strong option for coaches who demonstrate extraordinary ability, typically evidenced by championship titles, sustained winning records, or recognition as integral to their team’s success. To qualify, a coach must establish that their expertise places them among the small percentage of top professionals in their field. For athletes seeking permanent status in the U.S., the EB-1A immigrant petition —often referred to as the “extraordinary ability green card”—provides a direct path to lawful permanent residency. It requires clear documentation that the individual is among the very best in their sport and has achieved sustained national or international success. Unlike other green card categories, the EB-1A does not require employer sponsorship and can be self-petitioned. This has become a common path for MMA world champions, BJJ black belt medalists, Olympic athletes, and chess grandmasters—many of whom now represent the U.S. at the highest levels of international competition. It’s important to note that U.S. immigration law defines “athlete” broadly. Whether you are a professional football player in Europe, a sprinter from the Caribbean, a judoka, a gymnast, or a grandmaster in chess, your achievements may qualify under these categories if they are properly documented and presented. The key is a consistent record of excellence and recognition in your sport on a national or international scale. Our office specializes in these types of immigration matters. Whether you are an individual athlete looking to relocate or an organization seeking to bring international talent to your roster, we offer tailored legal strategies to support your goals. If you are exploring options to compete, train, or build your future in the U.S., we’re here to help you take the next step.
In January 2025, the U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act , marking a significant shift in immigration enforcement policy. The Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain certain non-U.S. nationals who have been arrested for theft-related offenses such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. Under this Act, the Department of Homeland Security must detain an individual who: (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The Act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. It authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a: Decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; Failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; Failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; Violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or Failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States. The Act's stringent detention requirements may lead to increased fear and uncertainty within immigrant communities. Individuals who are merely accused of certain crimes could face mandatory detention. The Act may also affect legal immigration processes. Increased detention and deportation efforts could strain resources, potentially leading to delays in processing visas and asylum applications. Given the evolving legal landscape: Stay Informed and/or Seek Legal Counsel - Consult with your immigration attorney to understand how new laws and policies may affect your situation and if you or someone you know is facing immigration-related legal issues. Know Your Rights - Familiarize yourself with your legal rights, especially concerning interactions with law enforcement and immigration authorities. Community Engagement - Participate in community organizations that provide support and resources for immigrants, fostering a network of assistance and advocacy. If you have any questions or would like to consult with an experienced immigration attorney, contact our office to schedule a consultation.
In a renewed wave of enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has started sending formal alerts to certain F-1 students participating in Optional Practical Training (OPT), flagging that their records reflect over 90 days without any reported employment. These students have been advised to update their employment status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) within 15 days. Failure to take timely corrective action may lead to the termination of the student's SEVIS record, effectively marking them as out of status, and may ultimately trigger removal proceedings. The notices are intended as a warning that students who do not comply with OPT reporting obligations are at risk of serious immigration consequences. Understanding OPT and Its Unemployment Limits Optional Practical Training (commonly referred to as “OPT”) is a work authorization benefit that allows eligible F-1 international students to gain hands-on experience in their field of study. Students may apply for pre-completion OPT (while still in school) or post-completion OPT (after graduation), typically for up to 12 months. Those with degrees in qualifying STEM fields may apply for an additional 24-month STEM OPT extension, giving them a total of 36 months of work authorization in the U.S. To maintain valid F-1 status while on OPT, students must remain actively employed in a position related to their field of study. The amount of time a student may remain in the United States while on OPT without being properly employed is capped at: 90 days during the standard 12-month post-completion OPT, and 150 days for those on the STEM OPT extension, which includes any days of unemployment accrued during the initial OPT period. These unemployment limits are cumulative and enforced strictly through SEVIS monitoring. What Should F-1 Students Do? If you are an F-1 student on OPT or STEM OPT and receive a warning or are unsure about your compliance status, act quickly: Contact your Designated School Official (DSO) immediately to review and, if necessary, update your SEVIS record. Ensure all employment is properly documented and reported through your school’s international office. Do not ignore warning notices, as failure to respond may lead to SEVIS termination and potentially the initiation of removal proceedings. It is also advisable to consult with a qualified immigration attorney to explore available options and understand how enforcement actions may affect your status or future immigration plans. If you received a notice or have questions about your F-1 status, our attorneys are here to help you take the right steps to protect your future in the United States. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
