What are the qualifications for an EB-1A Visa?
April Perez • January 5, 2022
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish
An EB-1(a)
is a visa for those that can prove they have an Extraordinary Ability or Achievement in the sciences, arts, education, business or athletics
through sustained national or international acclaim.
Sustained national or international acclaim is proven by showing that you have a one-time achievement or major award such as a Nobel Prize, Grammy or an Oscar or
that you can meet at least three
of the criteria below by providing adequate evidence (examples below):
- Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Evidence of an award can include: a certificate, a list of the criteria for the award, meaning how the winners are selected, and background on the award to show that it is a national or international award.
- Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
Evidence of membership can include: a membership certificate or letter from an official from the organization verifying your membership.
Evidence that the association demands outstanding achievements of their members can include: background on how the members are selected through official website links, background information on who selects the members, bylaws of the organization stating how members are selected and who selects them, background of other members, background on those who select members, articles about the organization, and background links about the organization.
- Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence of published material should show the source of the publication. You should also provide circulation numbers on the publication if it is in print, if it is an article published through a website it should be a website from a major publication that has a high volume of traffic. - Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel
Evidence of being a judge can include: a letter from the organization you were a judge for or the event you were a judge for explaining how you were selected, what the judging consisted of, and background on the event or organization you were a judge for.
- Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field
Evidence that the contribution was original can be: through a patent, or other verifying documentation.
Evidence that it was of major significance can be: shown through application by other organizations in the field of your original contribution, and contracts or letters verifying the wide use of your contribution. - Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Evidence can include: the article you published, evidence of where it was published, and evidence of the number of times the article was cited by others.
- Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Evidence can include: articles, flyers and other promotional materials for the exhibition. Contracts, and photos of the exhibition. Proof of sales of any work sold at the exhibition. - Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations
Evidence can include: letters from former employers explaining how your work was critical for the organization as a whole.
Evidence that the organization is distinguished can be: articles about the organization, awards the organization has won, and background on the organization.
- Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Evidence can be: paystubs, income taxes or other proof of payment for work in your field. The payments should be quantified, meaning that you need to prove how much you were paid per hour or per year for your work. - Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts
Evidence can include ticket, record, or video sales or box office receipts.
This is not an exhaustive list of possible evidence, and in some fields the evidence may not fall directly within the parameters of the criteria.
Aside from the criteria you must also be able to show that you will continue to work in your field of expertise.
USCIS will first determine whether you meet at least three of the criteria, and if you do, they will move on to do a final merits determination as to whether you are extraordinary.
An alien who falls within this category may self-petition by filing the proper forms and evidence. The idea of being “extraordinary” sounds simple, but you must be able to prove that you qualify. It is important to have the proper guidance from an attorney through this process.
This blog is not intended to be legal advice and nothing here should be construed as establishing an attorney client relationship. Please schedule a consultation with an immigration attorney before acting on any information read here.
This Facebook widget is no longer supported.
Similar Posts
Click here to read this article in Portuguese
Click here to read this article in Portuguese and Spanish
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
