¿Cómo afecta la recepción de asistencia pública mi solicitud de ajuste de estatus (AOS)?

Santos Lloyd Law Team • January 12, 2023

Click here to read this article in Portuguese and English

     La respuesta a esta pregunta cambió considerablemente después de que el presidente Biden revirtiera algunas de las duras políticas de inmigración del expresidente Trump. En 2019, Trump emitió una orden ejecutiva conocida como "La regla final de carga pública", que provocó que la recepción de la mayoría de los programas de asistencia pública afectara negativamente las solicitudes de AOS, y con pocas excepciones (por ejemplo, servicios de emergencia y beneficiarios de Medicaid que estaban embarazadas o eran menores a la edad de 21 años).

     Bajo la administración actual, su recibo de asistencia pública puede continuar afectando negativamente su petición de AOS, pero solo en circunstancias limitadas. Depende de 1) cuál es su estatus migratorio actual; 2) el tipo de asistencia pública que está recibiendo; y 3) cuáles son sus circunstancias personales.

     Si su estatus migratorio actual es el de asilado o refugiado, entonces su recibo pasado o actual de asistencia pública generalmente no afectará su solicitud de ajuste de estatus (AOS). Si no es un asilado o refugiado, se aplica lo siguiente.

     Con respecto al tipo de asistencia recibida, el Servicio de Inmigración y Aduanas de los Estados Unidos (USCIS, por sus siglas en inglés) evaluará si su recibo pasado o actual de asistencia pública indica que es probable que se convierta en una "carga pública", es decir, alguien que depende principalmente del gobierno para la subsistencia. Su solicitud será denegada si, en el momento de su solicitud, USCIS determina que actualmente es una carga pública o que es probable que se convierta en una carga pública en algún momento en el futuro.

     Sin embargo, al tomar su determinación, USCIS puede considerar solo ciertos factores: La medida en que usted dependió de 1) la asistencia pública para el mantenimiento de ingresos; y 2) si ha requerido atención a largo plazo en una institución a expensas del gobierno. Los siguientes tipos de asistencia pública se encuentran dentro de la primera categoría (asistencia pública para el mantenimiento de ingresos) y afectarán negativamente su solicitud en ciertas situaciones: 
  • Seguridad de Ingreso Suplementario (SSI);
  • Asistencia Temporal para Familias Necesitadas (TANF) Asistencia en efectivo; programas de asistencia en efectivo estatales y locales que brindan beneficios para el mantenimiento de ingresos (a menudo llamados programas de "asistencia general");
  • Programas para apoyar a los solicitantes institucionalizados para cuidados a largo plazo, por ejemplo, en un hogar de ancianos o institución de salud mental
     Cuanto más tiempo dependa de la asistencia en efectivo o la atención institucional mencionada anteriormente, más lo sopesará USCIS en su solicitud. Pero, incluso si ha confiado en uno de los programas de asistencia pública enumerados anteriormente, o si ha requerido atención institucional a largo plazo durante un período de tiempo, es posible que USCIS no niegue necesariamente su solicitud de AOS. Se requiere que USCIS evalúe esta información dentro del contexto de la totalidad de todas sus circunstancias personales. Sus circunstancias personales incluyen muchos factores diferentes, que incluyen, entre otros: su edad, salud, situación familiar, estado financiero, los recursos disponibles para usted, educación y habilidades vocacionales.

     Si recibió beneficios que no son en efectivo (aparte de la institucionalización para atención a largo plazo) o beneficios en efectivo para propósitos especiales que no fueron para el mantenimiento de ingresos, USCIS no lo sopesará en su contra. La siguiente es una lista no exhaustiva de beneficios no monetarios que no afectarán negativamente su solicitud:
  • Medicaid y otros seguros de salud y servicios de salud (incluida la asistencia pública para inmunizaciones y para pruebas y tratamiento de síntomas de enfermedades transmisibles;
  • Uso de clínicas de salud, servicios de rehabilitación a corto plazo y servicios médicos de emergencia (aparte del apoyo para la atención institucional a largo plazo;
  • Programa de Seguro Médico para Niños (CHIP);
  • Programas de nutrición, incluidos cupones de alimentos, el Programa especial de nutrición suplementaria para mujeres, bebés y niños (WIC), el Programa nacional de desayuno y almuerzo escolar y otros programas de asistencia alimentaria suplementaria y de emergencia;
  • Beneficios de vivienda;
  • Servicios de cuidado de niños;
  • Asistencia de energía, como el Programa de Asistencia de Energía para Hogares de Bajos Ingresos (LIHEAP);
  • Socorro de emergencia en casos de desastre;
  • Cuidado de crianza y asistencia para la adopción;
  • Asistencia educativa, incluidos los beneficios bajo la Ley de Head Start y ayuda para la educación primaria, secundaria o superior;
  • Programas, servicios o asistencia basados ​​en la comunidad (como comedores populares, asesoramiento e intervención en casos de crisis y refugio a corto plazo)
  • Programas estatales y locales que son similares a los programas mencionados anteriormente
¿Cómo se verá afectada mi solicitud de AOS si mi familiar es el que recibe asistencia pública, no yo?

Si su familiar actualmente o anteriormente dependía de la asistencia pública, pero no como su único medio de apoyo financiero, USCIS no sopesará ese beneficio en su contra al evaluar su solicitud. Pero si su familiar actualmente o anteriormente dependía de la asistencia pública como su único medio de apoyo financiero, USCIS tomará una determinación caso por caso. Evaluarán la asistencia pública de su familiar junto con la totalidad de sus circunstancias personales para determinar si es probable que se convierta en una carga pública en algún momento en el futuro.

Este blog no pretende ser un consejo legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que lea aquí.

By Shirin Navabi June 12, 2025
The United States has long been a destination for the world’s most talented athletes—not only to compete at the highest level, but to access world-class training, coaching opportunities, and long-term career prospects. Whether on the field, in the ring, or across the chessboard, athletes from across the globe are finding immigration pathways that allow them to pursue their athletic and professional goals in the U.S. U.S. immigration law offers several visa and green card options designed specifically for individuals with extraordinary athletic talent. These include the P-1A visa for internationally recognized athletes, the O-1A visa for individuals of extraordinary ability, and the EB-1A immigrant petition, which can lead to permanent residency and ultimately, U.S. citizenship. The P-1A visa is commonly used by professional athletes coming to the U.S. to compete in a specific event or season. This applies not only to individual athletes but also to members of teams or clubs recognized internationally. It is widely used by soccer players, basketball players, MMA fighters, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competitors, and even elite chess players. Athletes must demonstrate a high level of international recognition and a record of performance in their sport. The O-1A visa is a strong option for coaches who demonstrate extraordinary ability, typically evidenced by championship titles, sustained winning records, or recognition as integral to their team’s success. To qualify, a coach must establish that their expertise places them among the small percentage of top professionals in their field. For athletes seeking permanent status in the U.S., the EB-1A immigrant petition —often referred to as the “extraordinary ability green card”—provides a direct path to lawful permanent residency. It requires clear documentation that the individual is among the very best in their sport and has achieved sustained national or international success. Unlike other green card categories, the EB-1A does not require employer sponsorship and can be self-petitioned. This has become a common path for MMA world champions, BJJ black belt medalists, Olympic athletes, and chess grandmasters—many of whom now represent the U.S. at the highest levels of international competition. It’s important to note that U.S. immigration law defines “athlete” broadly. Whether you are a professional football player in Europe, a sprinter from the Caribbean, a judoka, a gymnast, or a grandmaster in chess, your achievements may qualify under these categories if they are properly documented and presented. The key is a consistent record of excellence and recognition in your sport on a national or international scale. Our office specializes in these types of immigration matters. Whether you are an individual athlete looking to relocate or an organization seeking to bring international talent to your roster, we offer tailored legal strategies to support your goals. If you are exploring options to compete, train, or build your future in the U.S., we’re here to help you take the next step.
By Denice Flores June 5, 2025
In January 2025, the U.S. Congress passed the Laken Riley Act , marking a significant shift in immigration enforcement policy. The Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain certain non-U.S. nationals who have been arrested for theft-related offenses such as burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. Under this Act, the Department of Homeland Security must detain an individual who: (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The Act also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. It authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a: Decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody; Failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews; Failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country; Violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or Failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States. The Act's stringent detention requirements may lead to increased fear and uncertainty within immigrant communities. Individuals who are merely accused of certain crimes could face mandatory detention. The Act may also affect legal immigration processes. Increased detention and deportation efforts could strain resources, potentially leading to delays in processing visas and asylum applications. Given the evolving legal landscape: Stay Informed and/or Seek Legal Counsel - Consult with your immigration attorney to understand how new laws and policies may affect your situation and if you or someone you know is facing immigration-related legal issues. Know Your Rights - Familiarize yourself with your legal rights, especially concerning interactions with law enforcement and immigration authorities. Community Engagement - Participate in community organizations that provide support and resources for immigrants, fostering a network of assistance and advocacy. If you have any questions or would like to consult with an experienced immigration attorney, contact our office to schedule a consultation.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar May 29, 2025
In a renewed wave of enforcement, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has started sending formal alerts to certain F-1 students participating in Optional Practical Training (OPT), flagging that their records reflect over 90 days without any reported employment. These students have been advised to update their employment status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) within 15 days. Failure to take timely corrective action may lead to the termination of the student's SEVIS record, effectively marking them as out of status, and may ultimately trigger removal proceedings. The notices are intended as a warning that students who do not comply with OPT reporting obligations are at risk of serious immigration consequences. Understanding OPT and Its Unemployment Limits Optional Practical Training (commonly referred to as “OPT”) is a work authorization benefit that allows eligible F-1 international students to gain hands-on experience in their field of study. Students may apply for pre-completion OPT (while still in school) or post-completion OPT (after graduation), typically for up to 12 months. Those with degrees in qualifying STEM fields may apply for an additional 24-month STEM OPT extension, giving them a total of 36 months of work authorization in the U.S. To maintain valid F-1 status while on OPT, students must remain actively employed in a position related to their field of study. The amount of time a student may remain in the United States while on OPT without being properly employed is capped at: 90 days during the standard 12-month post-completion OPT, and 150 days for those on the STEM OPT extension, which includes any days of unemployment accrued during the initial OPT period. These unemployment limits are cumulative and enforced strictly through SEVIS monitoring. What Should F-1 Students Do? If you are an F-1 student on OPT or STEM OPT and receive a warning or are unsure about your compliance status, act quickly: Contact your Designated School Official (DSO) immediately to review and, if necessary, update your SEVIS record. Ensure all employment is properly documented and reported through your school’s international office. Do not ignore warning notices, as failure to respond may lead to SEVIS termination and potentially the initiation of removal proceedings. It is also advisable to consult with a qualified immigration attorney to explore available options and understand how enforcement actions may affect your status or future immigration plans. If you received a notice or have questions about your F-1 status, our attorneys are here to help you take the right steps to protect your future in the United States. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
Show More