¿Es usted elegible para solicitar el estatus de residente permanente legal bajo la Ley de Ajuste Cubano?

Angelica Rice • September 21, 2023

Click here to read this article in English and Portuguese

        La Ley de Ajuste Cubano de 1966 (CAA, por sus siglas en inglés) permite a los nativos o ciudadanos cubanos que viven en los Estados Unidos y que cumplen ciertos requisitos de elegibilidad, solicitar convertirse en residentes permanentes legales (obtener la Green Card).


      Para ser elegible para la Green Card bajo la CAA, usted debe cumplir los siguientes requisitos:


  • Presentar correctamente el Formulario I-485, Solicitud de Registro de Residencia Permanente o Ajuste de Estatus;
  • Ser nativo o ciudadano de Cuba;
  • Haber sido inspeccionado y admitido o en libertad condicional después del 1 de enero de 1959;
  • Haber estado físicamente presente en los Estados Unidos durante al menos un año en el momento de presentar el Formulario I-485;
  • Estar presente físicamente en Estados Unidos en el momento de presentar el formulario I-485;
  • Ser admisible en los Estados Unidos para la residencia permanente legal o elegible para una exención de inadmisibilidad u otra forma de exención; y
  • Merecer el ejercicio favorable de la discreción del USCIS.


      El mayor obstáculo para la mayoría de los solicitantes es el tercer requisito: ¿fui debidamente inspeccionado y admitido en los Estados Unidos? Esta pregunta se plantea con mayor frecuencia para los nacionales cubanos que entraron en contacto con los funcionarios de inmigración a su entrada en los EE.UU. y fueron puestos en libertad bajo su propio reconocimiento (con un formulario I-220A).


      Durante años, la ley de inmigración ha afirmado que recibir un formulario I-220A y ser puesto en libertad bajo palabra (bajo caución juratoria) no equivalía a estar en "libertad condicional" según la ley. Sin embargo, un reciente anuncio de USCIS en febrero de 2022 ha abierto la puerta para que esto cambie. Bajo esta nueva directriz, cualquier ciudadano cubano que recibió un I-220A, previamente solicitó el Ajuste bajo la CAA y su solicitud fue denegada únicamente en la determinación de que no establecieron que habían sido admitidos o puestos en libertad condicional como se requiere, ahora puede presentar una moción para reabrir su caso previamente denegado o simplemente presentar una nueva solicitud de ajuste indicando que cumplen con los criterios de calificación y son elegibles para el estatus de la Green Card.


      ¡Si usted tiene curiosidad por saber más acerca de esta aplicación y si usted es elegible para el estatus de residente permanente legal a través de este proceso, por favor póngase en contacto con nuestra oficina y hable hoy mismo con alguno de nuestros profesionales altamente experimentados!


[1] https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/notices/USCIS_CAA_AA_485_Denied_NoParole_Process-Feb232022.pdf


Este blog no busca constituir una asesoría legal y nada de lo que aquí lea debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar basado en cualquier información contenida en el presente.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice

2026 Visa Freeze and Travel Bans

By Juliana LaMendola • March 13, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case

The 2026 RFE Surge

By Denice Flores • March 6, 2026
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.

Navigating the Surge in Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Terminations and Litigation: What You Need to Know

By Juliana LaMendola • February 19, 2026
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
Show More