Racionalización de las prórrogas de visado: La política de deferencia codificada en la norma de modernización H-1B
Kris Quadros-Ragar • January 16, 2025
Click here to read this article in English
Un acontecimiento clave se produjo en diciembre de 2024, cuando la política de deferencia fue oficialmente escrita en la regulación (la «regla de modernización H-1B»), que entrará en vigor el 17 de enero de 2025. Una vez que entre en vigor, los adjudicadores del USCIS deberán aplicar la política de deferencia a las solicitudes de prórroga relacionadas con el mismo empleador, el mismo empleado y los mismos detalles de trabajo.
USCIS todavía puede decidir no aplazar a la aprobación anterior si:
- Hubo un error material en la aprobación anterior.
- Ha habido un cambio material en las circunstancias o la elegibilidad.
- La nueva información plantea dudas sobre la admisibilidad.
Incluso en estas situaciones, los funcionarios deben explicar por qué no están aplazando. Es importante destacar que el USCIS no tiene que respetar las decisiones tomadas por otros organismos, como el Departamento de Estado o el Servicio de Aduanas y Protección de Fronteras.
Al convertir la política de deferencia en un reglamento, se hace más difícil para las futuras administraciones eliminarla rápidamente. Cualquier intento de rescindir o modificar la política requiere ahora un largo proceso de elaboración de normas que incluye un periodo de notificación y comentarios públicos.
Puntos clave para los empresarios
- Mayor previsibilidad: La política de deferencia, ahora un reglamento, da a los empleadores más certeza de que las peticiones de prórroga serán aprobadas si no hay cambios importantes en el papel del empleado o en la situación del empleador.
- Posibles cambios futuros: Una futura administración todavía podría tratar de rescindir esta regla, pero deben seguir un proceso regulatorio formal, que lleva tiempo y ofrece a los empleadores alguna advertencia.
- Presente las prórrogas con antelación: Los empresarios pueden presentar peticiones de prórroga hasta seis meses antes de que caduque el visado. La presentación temprana puede ayudar a evitar cambios inesperados de política y minimizar los riesgos de RFE o denegaciones.
En general, la codificación de la política de deferencia es un paso importante que ofrece una estabilidad y eficiencia muy necesarias en el proceso de inmigración de Estados Unidos. Planificando con antelación y manteniéndose informados, los empresarios pueden aprovechar esta mayor previsibilidad. Como siempre, trabajar en estrecha colaboración con un abogado de inmigración garantiza que las solicitudes de prórroga sean precisas, estén bien preparadas y se presenten con prontitud, especialmente en momentos en que la política puede evolucionar.
Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea.

Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.

In 1948, the world came together to declare that certain rights are inherent to every human being, regardless of nationality. Chief among these is the right to safety.
The Universal Right to Seek Safety
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), specifically Article 14, guarantees that "everyone has the right to


