Citoyenneté américaine de droit de naissance: Le nouveau décret de Trump et ses défis juridiques

Angelica Rice • January 23, 2025

Click here to read this article in English

Le 20 janvier 2025, le président Donald Trump a signé un décret intitulé « Protéger le sens et la valeur de la citoyenneté américaine », qui vise à mettre fin à la citoyenneté de naissance pour certains enfants nés aux États-Unis.  Ce décret vise spécifiquement les enfants nés de mères en situation irrégulière ou se trouvant temporairement aux États-Unis avec des visas, tels que des visas d'étudiant, de travail ou de tourisme, si le père n'est ni citoyen américain ni résident permanent légal. En vertu de cette nouvelle politique, ces enfants ne se verront plus accorder automatiquement la citoyenneté américaine. Le décret doit entrer en vigueur 30 jours après sa signature et ne s'applique qu'aux naissances survenues après cette période, ce qui signifie qu'il n'a pas d'effet rétroactif sur les enfants nés avant la date d'entrée en vigueur.

Ce décret remet en cause l'interprétation de longue date du 14e amendement de la Constitution américaine, qui garantit la citoyenneté à tous les individus nés sur le sol américain.  L'amendement stipule que « toutes les personnes nées ou naturalisées aux États-Unis et soumises à la juridiction de ce pays sont des citoyens des États-Unis et de l'État dans lequel elles résident ». Depuis plus d'un siècle, cette disposition est considérée comme accordant la citoyenneté à la plupart des personnes nées aux États-Unis, quel que soit le statut d'immigration de leurs parents.

En réponse à ce décret, des groupes de défense des droits des immigrants, dont l'Union américaine pour les libertés civiles (ACLU), ont intenté des actions en justice pour en contester la constitutionnalité. Ils affirment que le décret viole le mandat clair du 14e amendement et sape les valeurs américaines fondamentales. Les experts juridiques prévoient que cette question sera contestée devant les tribunaux et que le décret pourrait être bloqué ou annulé.


Le 23 janvier 2025, un juge fédéral de Seattle a émis un ordre de restriction temporaire (TRO), bloquant de fait l'entrée en vigueur du décret pendant les 14 prochains jours. Le tribunal a invoqué des violations potentielles de la Constitution et la nécessité d'obtenir des informations juridiques supplémentaires avant de pouvoir procéder à l'application du décret. Cette décision apporte un soulagement temporaire aux familles concernées et laisse présager une longue bataille juridique. D'autres audiences sont prévues pour déterminer si le décret sera bloqué de manière permanente ou s'il sera autorisé à être appliqué.


Les familles touchées par ce décret s'inquiètent de plus en plus des difficultés que pourraient rencontrer leurs enfants s'ils n'avaient pas la nationalité américaine. L'accès aux services essentiels, à l'éducation et à l'emploi pourrait devenir plus difficile pour les personnes concernées. Cependant, il est important de garder espoir, car le système juridique prévoit des contrôles et des contrepoids pour s'assurer que toute action de l'exécutif s'aligne sur les principes constitutionnels. Historiquement, des tentatives similaires visant à restreindre la citoyenneté de naissance ont fait l'objet de contestations juridiques importantes et n'ont pas été confirmées.

Si vous ou quelqu'un que vous connaissez risquez d'être affecté par ce décret, il est essentiel que vous restiez informé et que vous compreniez vos droits. Chez Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., nos avocats de confiance spécialisés dans l'immigration sont à votre disposition pour vous guider et vous soutenir pendant cette période d'incertitude, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter si vous avez besoin d'aide.

Ce blog n'est pas destiné à fournir des conseils juridiques et rien ici ne doit être interprété comme établissant une relation avocat-client. Veuillez prendre rendez-vous avec un avocat spécialisé en droit de l'immigration avant d'agir sur la base de toute information lue ici.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice


By Joseph Lennarz April 23, 2026
Choosing the right recommenders is one of the most critical steps in building a successful O-1 visa petition. The standard for this visa is a high one, you must not only be an accomplished professional within your field but among the very top cadre of your peers. Reference letters serve as the connective tissue of an O-1 petition, transforming a dry list of accolades into a compelling narrative of extraordinary achievement. While awards and press clippings prove that you did something, reference letters provide the expert testimony necessary to explain why it mattered. In the eyes of USCIS, these letters function as evidence that contextualize your work within the broader industry, offering a level of nuance and credibility beyond the objective facts of your career journey. Without them, an adjudicating officer is left to interpret complex professional milestones in a vacuum; with them, you have a panel of qualified experts certifying that you are not just competent, but extraordinary and indispensable to your field. In short, they are the "voice" of your petition, validating your status as an individual of extraordinary ability. If you are beginning the process of identifying your recommenders, here are four essential qualities you should look for in a contact. 1. High Public Visibility In the eyes of USCIS, the status of the recommender often reflects the status of the applicant. USCIS officers will scrutinize every aspect of your petition, and this includes researching your references. If a recommender is someone who is easily recognizable due to an extensive public profile, especially due to their accomplishments, it makes it easier to verify that their opinion of you as a candidate should be given more weight and taken seriously. Look for individuals who have a "public profile." This could mean: They are frequently quoted in major media outlets. They have a significant social media following or industry-wide recognition. They have won major awards (Oscars, Grammys, Pulitzers, etc.) or hold prestigious titles. Their name is synonymous with success in your specific niche. When an officer sees a letterhead from a globally recognized entity or a signature from a famous figure, it immediately sets the tone that you are a candidate worth evaluating, and the words they have written on your behalf will weigh strongly on the officer’s decision. 2. Significant Accomplishment in the Field Your recommender should be an "expert" in their own right, whatever that means for your particular field. USCIS needs to know that the person praising you is actually qualified to evaluate your talent and knows the difference between someone who is merely accomplished in the field versus someone who has reached the pinnacle of their profession. Ideally, your contact should be more senior or more accomplished than you are. They should have a track record of success that is beyond reproach. However, they don't necessarily have to be in your exact job title. They can be in a related field, provided they are in a position to judge your work. For example, if you are a VFX Artist, a famous Film Director or a Senior Producer would be highly qualified to evaluate your contributions to a production. 3. A Deep Professional or Personal Connection One of the most common mistakes O-1 applicants make is chasing "big names" who don't actually know them. A generic letter from a celebrity who has never met you will likely be dismissed as "boilerplate." The strongest letters come from people who can speak to your work with specificity because they have worked directly with you in a professional context. You should look for contacts who know you through: An extensive personal history: Someone who has mentored you or followed your career trajectory for years, who can thus attest to your professional growth and elite trajectory over time. Direct collaboration: Someone who has worked alongside you in a professional context, and has witnessed your impact as a professional first hand because they were also directly invested in whatever project or goal you were working towards. This can also include peers you competed against, if you are an athlete. Your reference letters should describe specific instances where your skills and accomplishments shined through, or where you and your reference worked together towards meeting some goal. This level of detail comes naturally when your reference truly knows you as a professional because of a deep familiarity with your work or direct experience with you as a professional. 4. A Willingness to Advocate Zealously This is perhaps the most underrated quality in a recommender. You do not want a contact who is only willing to "confirm the facts." A letter that simply affirms facts and offers a standard affirmation of your skills and accomplishments will not convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. You should seek recommenders who are willing to be effusive. They should be prepared to use strong language—words like indispensable, unparalleled, world-class, and pioneer. This is a visa for exceptionally accomplished professionals, and for your references to be effective their words must convey to the officer that you are truly extraordinary. If a contact is hesitant to provide a glowing, high-energy recommendation, they may not be the right choice for this specific legal process. Final Thoughts The O-1 visa is a high bar, and your reference letters are the pillars that hold up your petition. By seeking the right qualities in your references, you can ensure that you will receive strong and impactful letters that will in turn help to maximize your chances of receiving an O-1 visa. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, we pride ourselves on assisting our talented clients in every aspect of the O-1 visa process. If you are an exceptionally talented individual considering applying for an O-1 visa, please contact us today and we will be happy to guide you towards a successful outcome.
By Kris Quadros-Ragar April 9, 2026
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has concluded the annual H-1B cap lottery for Fiscal Year 2027, with employers and legal representatives now able to check selection outcomes through their registration portals.
By Kathya Dawe April 3, 2026
In 1948, the world came together to declare that certain rights are inherent to every human being, regardless of nationality. Chief among these is the right to safety. The Universal Right to Seek Safety The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), specifically Article 14, guarantees that "everyone has the right to
Show More