La ciudadanía estadounidense por derecho de nacimiento: La nueva orden de Trump y sus desafíos legales

Angelica Rice • January 23, 2025

Click here to read this article in English

El 20 de enero de 2025, el presidente Donald Trump firmó una orden ejecutiva titulada «Proteger el significado y el valor de la ciudadanía estadounidense», cuyo objetivo es poner fin a la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento para determinados niños nacidos en Estados Unidos.  Esta orden se dirige específicamente a los niños nacidos de madres en situación ilegal o que se encuentran temporalmente en Estados Unidos con visados, como visados de estudiante, trabajo o turista, si el padre no es ciudadano estadounidense ni residente permanente legal. En virtud de esta nueva política, a estos niños ya no se les concederá automáticamente la ciudadanía estadounidense. La orden entrará en vigor 30 días después de su firma y sólo se aplicará a los nacimientos que se produzcan después de ese periodo, lo que significa que no afectará retroactivamente a los niños nacidos antes de la fecha de entrada en vigor.

Esta orden ejecutiva desafía la interpretación que se viene haciendo desde hace tiempo de la 14ª Enmienda de la Constitución de Estados Unidos, que garantiza la ciudadanía a todas las personas nacidas en suelo estadounidense.  La enmienda establece que «todas las personas nacidas o naturalizadas en Estados Unidos y sujetas a su jurisdicción son ciudadanos de Estados Unidos y del Estado en el que residan». Durante más de un siglo, se ha entendido que esta disposición concede la ciudadanía a la mayoría de las personas nacidas en Estados Unidos, independientemente de la situación migratoria de sus padres.

En respuesta a la orden ejecutiva, grupos de defensa de los derechos de los inmigrantes, entre ellos la Unión Estadounidense por las Libertades Civiles (ACLU por sus siglas en ingles), han presentado demandas que impugnan su constitucionalidad. Sostienen que la orden viola el claro mandato de la 14ª Enmienda y socava los valores fundamentales estadounidenses. Los expertos jurídicos prevén que esta cuestión será impugnada en los tribunales, con la posibilidad de que la orden sea bloqueada o anulada.



El 23 de enero de 2025, un juez federal de Seattle dictó una orden de restricción temporal (OTR), que bloquea la entrada en vigor de la orden ejecutiva durante los próximos 14 días. El tribunal citó posibles violaciones constitucionales y la necesidad de más información jurídica antes de proceder a su aplicación. Esta sentencia proporciona un alivio temporal a las familias afectadas y señala la probabilidad de una batalla legal prolongada. Están previstas nuevas vistas para determinar si la orden se bloquea permanentemente o se permite su aplicación.

Las familias afectadas por esta orden están cada vez más preocupadas por los posibles problemas a los que podrían enfrentarse sus hijos sin la ciudadanía estadounidense. El acceso a los servicios esenciales, la educación y las oportunidades de empleo podría ser más difícil para los afectados. Sin embargo, es importante mantener la esperanza, ya que el sistema legal proporciona controles y equilibrios para garantizar que cualquier acción ejecutiva se ajuste a los principios constitucionales. Históricamente, intentos similares de restringir la ciudadanía por derecho de nacimiento se han enfrentado a importantes desafíos legales y no han sido confirmados.

Si usted o alguien que usted conoce puede ser afectado por esta orden ejecutiva, mantenerse informado y entender sus derechos es crucial. En Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., nuestros abogados de inmigración de confianza están disponibles para proporcionar orientación y apoyo durante este tiempo incierto, por favor póngase en contacto con nosotros si necesita ayuda.

Este blog no pretende ser una asesoría legal y nada aquí debe interpretarse como el establecimiento de una relación abogado-cliente. Programe una consulta con un abogado de inmigración antes de actuar sobre cualquier información que aquí lea.

This Facebook widget is no longer supported.

Angelica Rice

2026 Visa Freeze and Travel Bans

By Juliana LaMendola • March 13, 2026
On January 14, 2026, the Trump administration announced a freeze on immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries . The administration states that this “visa freeze” is intended to review security protocols, “reduce risks,” and control immigration flows. However, the immediate reality is that this change in policy has temporarily suspended visa processing and restricted travel for applicants from numerous countries across the globe. While the legal landscape surrounding these suspensions is highly fluid and subject to change, it is important to consider how this “visa freeze” might impact your current status or immigration plans. The scope of the restrictions varies drastically depending on your country of origin and specific visa category. Most notably, a nationality-based travel ban restricts visa issuance for 19 countries : Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Beyond this targeted ban, a broader freeze affects applicants from a designated list of up to 75 countries, leading to indefinite delays for many visa petitions. However, it is important to note that immigrant visa applications first need to be processed through USCIS, which has not paused processing applications from the 75 countries. Thus, it is important to contact an attorney to understand at what point in the process this visa freeze may affect your case. While Brazil is included in the list of 75 countries, at the time of this publication, the freeze does not include non-immigrant visas for Brazil . Non-immigrant visas are granted to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis for specific purposes, such as tourism, studying, or temporary work. This means that Brazilian applicants can still safely pursue non-immigrant employment options, such as O visas for individuals with extraordinary ability or P visas for internationally recognized athletes, without being subjected to the current travel bans or suspensions. This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. There are many changes and uncertainties, so please consult with a qualified attorney at Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C. to understand how these evolving policies might affect your specific case

The 2026 RFE Surge

By Denice Flores • March 6, 2026
Recent data in 2026 shows a sharp increase in Requests for Evidence across employment-based visa categories such as EB-1, EB-2 NIW, O, and H-1B. Requests for Evidence (RFEs) are no longer reserved for borderline cases; even robust petitions for high-level talent are facing unprecedented scrutiny. The expansion of the USCIS Vetting Center means automated tools are cross-referencing every petition, triggering RFEs for even the smallest inconsistencies. For EB-2 NIW petitions, adjudicators are increasingly questioning the "National Importance" of a candidate’s endeavor. Even for those with impressive credentials, USCIS now demands evidence of how their work specifically benefits the U.S. on a prospective basis. For O-1A and O-1B visas, officers are applying narrower interpretations of "distinction" and "extraordinary ability," often mischaracterizing evidence already present in the record. Additionally, a troubling 2026 trend is the correlation between Premium Processing and RFEs . For discretionary categories like EB-1A and EB-2 NIW, Premium Processing has increasingly become a "fast track" to a poorly reasoned RFE. Reports indicate that adjudicators, pressured by 15-business-day timelines, may be relying on AI-assisted vetting tools that trigger automated RFEs with general and boilerplate language, rather than a thorough review and analysis of supporting documents and evidence filed. With USCIS employing more rigorous AI-driven vetting and a narrower interpretation of visa criteria, the margin for error has disappeared . As such, ensure you consult with an experienced immigration attorney before filing a petition. ' If you have any questions, please schedule a consultation with one of our experienced attorneys, and we will be more than happy to assist you.

Navigating the Surge in Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Terminations and Litigation: What You Need to Know

By Juliana LaMendola • February 19, 2026
In recent weeks, the U.S. government has moved to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for multiple countries, sparking a wave of last-minute litigation and creating significant uncertainty for beneficiaries. This shift is having a profound impact on those who rely on TPS for lawful presence and work authorization in the United States. Across the country, federal courts have intervened to pause or block scheduled TPS terminations for several countries, including Burma (Myanmar), Ethiopia, Haiti, South Sudan, and Syria. In response to these court orders, USCIS has updated its webpages to indicate that TPS status and related Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) are extended for these populations. However, USCIS is intentionally not providing specific new end dates for EAD validity while the litigation remains in flux. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has prominently noted that it "vehemently disagrees" with these court orders and is actively working with the Department of Justice on next steps. This legal landscape remains highly unpredictable and varies drastically depending on the country of origin. For example, on February 9, 2026, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay allowing the government to proceed with the termination of TPS for Nicaragua, Honduras, and Nepal while the underlying legal challenges continue. Because of this ruling, the automatic extension of work authorization for these individuals has ended, and employers are now required to reverify the work authorization of affected employees, who must present alternative valid documentation to continue their employment. These rapid changes and the lack of clear end dates are causing complications beyond the workplace. Because driver's licenses often track the length of an individual's authorized stay, many DMVs are currently declining to issue or renew driver's licenses for impacted TPS populations. For employers, managing internal communications, avoiding onboarding errors, and navigating Form I-9 compliance has become increasingly complex. It is more important than ever to be well-prepared and proactive in monitoring these rapid changes. At Santos Lloyd Law Firm, P.C., our immigration attorneys are ready to guide you through this evolving process and ensure you are informed, and supported. Please contact us if you have questions or need assistance.
Show More